On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 09:58, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> But there is still something wrong with my understanding. When I compile
> the attached with 2.22, Lily complains of a barcheck fail at 15,30 :-(
>
> This is caused by \unfoldRepeats in the MIDI version of the score and the
>
Hi Joe,
But there is still something wrong with my understanding. When I
compile the attached with 2.22, Lily complains of a barcheck fail at
15,30 :-(
This is caused by \unfoldRepeats in the MIDI version of the score and
the conflicting simultaneous \partials you issue in mill_mill_o (begi
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 14:11, David Wright
wrote:
> Apart from your commandline, we also need to know what and how you
> installed the version you're using. If it helps, I installed the
> downloaded file lilypond-2.22.0-1.linux-64.sh with the commands:
>
> $ cd ~
> $ bash .../lilypond-2.22.0-
On Wed 24 Feb 2021 at 05:03:15 (+), Joe McCool wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 13:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> >
> > \alternative {
> > { g8 [ fis8 g8 ] e8 [ fis8 g8 ] |
> > \set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 5/8)
> > a8 [ fis8 d8 ] c8 b8 } % b4 } % ←
> > {
> > \s
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 13:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> \alternative {
> { g8 [ fis8 g8 ] e8 [ fis8 g8 ] |
> \set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 5/8)
> a8 [ fis8 d8 ] c8 b8 } % b4 } % ←
> {
> \set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 6/8)
> d8 [ cis8 d8 ] fi
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 06:04, Joe McCool via LilyPond user discussion <
lilypond-user@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> David, I really appreciate your help. But I still have a wee problem:
>
> When I look at newmend.pdf, it looks spot on to me. But if I pull down
your newmend.ly and compile it here, the resu
David, I really appreciate your help. But I still have a wee problem:
When I look at newmend.pdf, it looks spot on to me. But if I pull down
your newmend.ly and compile it here, the result is completely different.
See attached.
No doubt this is another cockup on my part :-(
--
Thanks.
__
On Sat 20 Feb 2021 at 12:46:25 (-0800), Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
>
> I have made some minor changes to conform with performance.
You've set the 40-bar version, originally posted because
the OP hadn't worked out how to repeat the last eight bars
(itself containing the 4-bar repeat).
But, that s
Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: spurious partial in 2nd repeat abc->ly
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 19:45, Mark Stephen Mrotek mailto:carsonm...@ca.rr.com> > wrote:
Joe,
Thanks for the help Mark et al.
The second repeated section starts with a partial measure.
But
: spurious partial in 2nd repeat abc->ly
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 19:45, Mark Stephen Mrotek mailto:carsonm...@ca.rr.com> > wrote:
Joe,
Thanks for the help Mark et al.
The second repeated section starts with a partial measure.
But there is no \partial there in the source co
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 19:45, Mark Stephen Mrotek
wrote:
> Joe,
>
Thanks for the help Mark et al.
>
>
> The second repeated section starts with a partial measure.
>
But there is no \partial there in the source code, hence my problem. With
the source as shown in my original post the resulting
Joe,
The second repeated section starts with a partial measure.
The first alternative is two complete measures.
The two are incompatible.
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Joe McCool
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 9:19
On Fri 19 Feb 2021 at 17:19:13 (+), Joe McCool wrote:
> Please, I cannot understand what I am doing wrong. When I compile the ly
> file, I get a spurious partial in the 2nd alternative of the 2nd part.
>
> %%
[…]
>
>
>
From: lilypond-user
on behalf of Joe McCool
Date: Friday, February 19, 2021 at 10:21 AM
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: spurious partial in 2nd repeat abc->ly
Please, I cannot understand what I am doing wrong. When I compile the ly file,
I get a spurious partial in the 2nd alternative
14 matches
Mail list logo
