-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Montag, 20. April 2009 05:31:20 Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On 4/17/09 11:02 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Am Freitag, 17. April 2009 schrieb Frédéric Bron:
> >
> > Hmm, no you are right
On 4/17/09 11:02 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Freitag, 17. April 2009 schrieb Frédéric Bron:
>
> Hmm, no you are right. It seems that when using a music-function, the scheme
> expression is:
>
> (make-music 'SequentialMusic
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 17. April 2009 schrieb Frédéric Bron:
> > Attached is a sample file to show how the definition of spanners could
> > work with my patch. I've also implemented two functions to give the text
> > of the spanner directly in the postfix call.
>
> Attached is a sample file to show how the definition of spanners could work
> with my patch. I've also implemented two functions to give the text of the
> spanner directly in the postfix call.
When I look at your dynamic_spanners_postfix.pdf file, it seems to me
that on the second line (with the
> So, I took a look at the issue today and created a patch, which will now allow
> all dynamic spanner starters to be implemented as postfix-operators.
>
> The short (<15 quite trivial lines!) patch is up for review at:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/39047
>
> Basically, my question for now is whe
In message , Piero Faustini
writes
.ExternalClass .EC_hmmessage P {padding:0px;} .ExternalClass
body.EC_hmmessage {font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
recognising the original Italian from is adjectival.
thus sorry for them, but it is WRONG at all. This is plain english syntax
rules roughly
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:40:24AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Werner LEMBERG wrote Saturday, April 11, 2009 9:35 AM
>
>
>>
>>> In an english context, the plural is simple: "crescendoes".
>>
>> Ouch. I would use `crescendos'.
>
> To be pedantic, if "crescendo" is not a noun there is no
> plur
All of this, of course, to avoid answering Werner's question... that's REAL
pedantery ;)
> To be pedantic, if "crescendo" is not a noun there is no
_
Quante ne sai? Scoprilo con CrossWire!
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/14063036
Werner LEMBERG wrote Saturday, April 11, 2009 9:35 AM
In an english context, the plural is simple: "crescendoes".
Ouch. I would use `crescendos'.
To be pedantic, if "crescendo" is not a noun there is no
plural, even in English. It should always be written as
"crescendo markings" or "c
> In an english context, the plural is simple: "crescendoes".
Ouch. I would use `crescendos'.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
...it's a dirty job but...
the italian term "crescendo" is not a noun, is a gerund (meaning "raising",
"growing"), so, when substantivated, in italian language, is indeclinable -
thus if I "amo il crescendo rossiniano", I still "amo tutti i crescendo
rossiniani" (if you find an italian who says "
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:54:22AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > I know that it is not possible to implement this only with scheme and
> > lily code but I am sure it is possible in C++.
>
> Yes, some simple lines of C++ were required.
>
> Attached is a sample file to show how the definitio
On 4/10/09 5:54 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> On Sonntag, 22. Februar 2009 09:25:57 Frédéric Bron wrote:
>> I am in charge of the question of (de)crescendo syntax issue in 2.12.2.
>
> Okay, sorry if I'm working on the same issue as you now, but I simply got too
> frustrated with hundreds
On Sonntag, 22. Februar 2009 09:25:57 Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I am in charge of the question of (de)crescendo syntax issue in 2.12.2.
Okay, sorry if I'm working on the same issue as you now, but I simply got too
frustrated with hundreds of pages of old scores suddenly changing
cresc/hairpin behav
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure why we have both \cr and \<. If the two really are equivalent,
>>> one ought to be deprecated before it is ultimately removed.
>>
>> I have a vague notion that \cr *was* deprecated.
>>
Graham Percival wrote:
I'm not sure why we have both \cr and \<. If the two really are equivalent,
one ought to be deprecated before it is ultimately removed.
I have a vague notion that \cr *was* deprecated.
No! If you look in ly/spanners-init.ly, you will see that \cr is used
int
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:37:50PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> > - \cresc, \dim, \decr, \decresc produce a text without spanner, applies
>> > only once to the previous note, no need to finish with \! or \endcresc,
>> > this could be implemented with a \markup comma
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:37:50PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > - \cresc, \dim, \decr, \decresc produce a text without spanner, applies
> > only once to the previous note, no need to finish with \! or \endcresc,
> > this could be implemented with a \markup command
>
> I don't like the idea o
Frederic,
I have made some comments in your message below. Thanks for taking on this
project.
This type of proposal probably should go to lilypond-devel, rather than
-user, so I'm cross-posting to -devel.
On 2/22/09 1:25 AM, "Frédéric Bron" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am in charge of the question
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 09:25:57AM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Here are my dreams:
>
> - \<, \>, \! are used to start/stop (de)crescendo spanner (hairpin or text),
> - crescTextXXX, dimTextXXX, crescHairpin, dimHairpin decide if \<, \>,
> \! produce text or hairpin (applies for ev
20 matches
Mail list logo
