> So, I took a look at the issue today and created a patch, which will now allow > all dynamic spanner starters to be implemented as postfix-operators. > > The short (<15 quite trivial lines!) patch is up for review at: > http://codereview.appspot.com/39047 > > Basically, my question for now is whether this the right approach. Call it a > proof-of-concept patch. > If so, we'll need to think about possible upgrade paths for the syntax changes > that are introduced by making all dynamic spanners postfix operators... > The patch also does not include the actual definitions of things like \dim, > \cresc, etc.
Wonderful!!! Thanks a lot for this great job! Frédéric _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
