On Sat 30 Jan 2016 at 00:00:43 (+0100), Przemyslaw Pawelczyk wrote:
> I've noticed another thing just now, after zooming in.
> Regardless of the overrides, first half note in the lower staff
> actually does not line up with quater note in the upper staff.
Isn't that because a minim is wider then
is the PDF with both overrides:
> http://paste.przemoc.net/lilypond/piano-centered-dynamics/piano-centered-dynamics-workaround.pdf
Here is the PDF w/o overrides:
http://paste.przemoc.net/lilypond/piano-centered-dynamics/piano-centered-dynamics.pdf
I've noticed another thing just now, after
Hi, Abraham!
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Abraham Lee wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Przemyslaw Pawelczyk [via Lilypond] <
> ml-node+s1069038n186599...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>> There is a piano centered dynamics template that was present in
>> Lilypond L
Przemyslaw,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Przemyslaw Pawelczyk [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n186599...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There is a piano centered dynamics template that was present in
> Lilypond Learning Manual for v2.14, but is not available in recent
Hi!
There is a piano centered dynamics template that was present in
Lilypond Learning Manual for v2.14, but is not available in recent
versions:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/learning/piano-templates
If we take it (w/o midi part, which is not needed here) and add s1 in
Hi,
See also: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=357
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-05-17 20:30 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kobel :
> On 05/17/2015 08:04 PM, Marco wrote:
>
>> How is possible to center perfectly dynamics symbols between the staves
>> of a
>> piano staff?
>>
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> see https://code.goog
On 05/17/2015 08:04 PM, Marco wrote:
How is possible to center perfectly dynamics symbols between the staves of a
piano staff?
Hi Marco,
see https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1127 :-(
(And shame on me for withdrawing my bounty on that one...)
Best,
Alexander
__
How is possible to center perfectly dynamics symbols between the staves of a
piano staff?
Thank you in advance to all for the your answers.
Best regards
Marco
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 6 April 2010 09:41, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> I do have a question: Why is the horizontal positioning different when using
> dynamics attached to notes like { c4\mf } and dynamics that are entered in a
> Dynamics context ? The latter are positioned more to the left. I don't like
> that. I lik
Hi,
I just discovered that with the current versions of Lilypond it is now
much easier to get piano-centered-dynamics than in older versions thanks
to a Dynamics context. Apparently I had missed the introduction of this
nice feature, but a late thanks anyway !
I do have a question: Why is
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 11:58 +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
> >> is it possible to have the Dynamics (the \p in the example below)
> >> in a layout like the "Piano centered dynamics" really centered
Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
is it possible to have the Dynamics (the \p in the example below)
in a layout like the "Piano centered dynamics" really centered
between the staves (i.e., the staff lines), instead of centered
b
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
>> is it possible to have the Dynamics (the \p in the example below)
>> in a layout like the "Piano centered dynamics" really centered
>> between the staves (i.e., the staff lines), instead of centered
&g
Hi Alexander,
is it possible to have the Dynamics (the \p in the example below)
in a layout like the "Piano centered dynamics" really centered
between the staves (i.e., the staff lines), instead of centered
between the skylines of all elements in the staves?
+1
I offered to $pon
Hi all,
is it possible to have the Dynamics (the \p in the example below) in a
layout like the "Piano centered dynamics" really centered between the
staves (i.e., the staff lines), instead of centered between the skylines
of all elements in the staves? I have a score where slurs
I'll take that as "No we don't look after it any more"
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/piano-centered-dynamics-tp20763875p20946301.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Hi guys,
What about piano centered dynamics? Has there been any development in the
past months about this imho very essential feature of lilypond? Is there
already a totally new version from scratch planned?
What's the best workaround for now to produce a decent piano score (e.g.
r
I know that it's an old snippet, but for those of us who don't really
understand the finer workings of it, can the snippet in the documentation be
updated to use the "New_dynamic_engraver" and "Dynamic_align_engraver" as
suggested by neil?
___
lilypo
Wow, I thought I was going crazy. If I use the template for piano
centered dynamics, dynamic text overrides don't work unless they're
attached to the proper voice context. Snippet follows.
\version "2.11.57"
\layout {
\context {
\type "Engraver_gr
2008/7/17 Jim Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Neil,
> thanks for the info! I had plowed through section 4.5.3 previously, but the
> explicit example you mentioned looks like it will be more helpful--Jim
Unfortunately, that section is undermined by the formatting of the
examples, since every syste
Hi Jim,
2008/7/17 jimmy2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I still wish I knew how to force staves of a particular system to be closer.
> I tried various commands which seemed like they should work, but with no
> effect.
Have a look at the headword for NR 1.8 `Text'
(http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Document
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Staff-spacing-problem-with-piano-centered-dynamics-tp18454033p18517228.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
tried everything I could find in the documentation and on this
forum which seemed to be relevant, and nothing has had any effect on this
unwanted extra vertical space. I will greatly appreciate any advice!
--Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Staff-spacing-problem-
al space. I will greatly appreciate any advice!
--Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Staff-spacing-problem-with-piano-centered-dynamics-tp18454033p18454033.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
ll greatly appreciate any advice!
--Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Staff-spacing-problem-with-piano-centered-dynamics-tp18454033p18454033.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilyp
2008/6/4 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is a known problem that has not made it into the bug tracker, as far as
> I can see.
Now it has:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=631
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing lis
This is a known problem that has not made it into the bug tracker, as
far as I can see.
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-04/msg00136.html
Also, as you can see later in the same thread, it doesn't help to add
the bar engraver
to the context. Here comes a somewhat modified
Am 04.06.2008 um 13:42 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Well, it's not very elegant but it works o.k. I just override the
dynamics positioning each time I need it. I just experimented to
find the right values. To make life easier I define the override as
a variable:
nuj = \once \override Dynami
Well, it's not very elegant but it works o.k. I just override the
dynamics positioning each time I need it. I just experimented to find
the right values. To make life easier I define the override as a variable:
nuj = \once \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'(+1.0 . -0.0)
Then I just g
2008/6/4 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, since no one is going to answer this I guess I'll answer it myself:
> RTFM (the Learning Manual, that is) :D
I have encountered similar problems with dynamics colliding with
cross-staff barlines, but I never really found a way to get rid of
this
Well, since no one is going to answer this I guess I'll answer it
myself: RTFM (the Learning Manual, that is) :D
(I figured it out...)
Jon
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Thanks Graham. I went and got this template and applied it to a piano
piece of mine. The centering of dynamics is lovely, but I als
Thanks Graham. I went and got this template and applied it to a piano
piece of mine. The centering of dynamics is lovely, but I also have a
problem that many of the dynamics that are attached to a spacer at the
beginning of a measure *collide* with the barline. Has anyone else had
this probl
xtra-offset overrides.
Oooh, where does one find this elusive piano centered dynamics
template for 2.11?
You look at the 2.11 docs, click on Snippet List (SL), then click
on Templates. How is that hard to find?
Cheers,
- Graham
Ah, thanks. I've never used those before. I&#
>
>
> Oooh, where does one find this elusive piano centered dynamics
> template for 2.11?
You look at the 2.11 docs, click on Snippet List (SL), then click
on Templates. How is that hard to find?
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mail
11, which is slightly different; it
doesn't need the hackish extra-offset overrides.
Regards,
Neil
Oooh, where does one find this elusive piano centered dynamics
template for 2.11?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://list
2008/6/2 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Try:
> \override VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(0 . 3)
>
> instead of (-1 . 1 )
>
> It's ugly, but it (kind of) works.
...or use the template for 2.11, which is slightly different; it
doesn't need the hackish extra-offset
2008/6/2 James E. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Really, all I would like is to have the dynamics centered between the two
> piano staves.
Try:
> \layout {
> \context {
> \type "Engraver_group"
> \name Dynamics
>
I'm really tring here, there should be online classes to figure this
out, it just doesn't make sense to me. If anyone would be willing to
help, I've posted a sample of what the music looks like, and it can be
seen here.
Really, all I would like is to have the dynamics centered between the
t
2008/5/31 James E. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Okay, I'm reading up on this, but before I even begin, is there a way to
> work around needing dynamics in every system for this to work? 'Cause that's
> a deal-breaker right there for me.
How about invisible dynamics at the beginning of any system
Am 31.05.2008 um 11:55 schrieb Neil Puttock:
Hi James,
2008/5/31 James E. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think the forced-distance might be a bug, everything else in the
align-interface between the two branches (2.10 and 2.11) are the
same, just
the user-settable forced-distance is missing
Am 31.05.2008 um 11:55 schrieb Neil Puttock:
Hi James,
2008/5/31 James E. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think the forced-distance might be a bug, everything else in the
align-interface between the two branches (2.10 and 2.11) are the
same, just
the user-settable forced-distance is missing
Hi James,
2008/5/31 James E. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think the forced-distance might be a bug, everything else in the
> align-interface between the two branches (2.10 and 2.11) are the same, just
> the user-settable forced-distance is missing :(
AFAIK, the forced-distance property was a h
I think the forced-distance might be a bug, everything else in the
align-interface between the two branches (2.10 and 2.11) are the same,
just the user-settable forced-distance is missing :(
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http
I'm using the 2.11 branch of lilypond, and I notice that the forced-
distance used in the piano centered dynamics isn't there (lilypond
tells me, and there's no mention that I can see in the 2.11
documentation). It's in the 2.10 branch (lilypond doesn't tell me it&#
l correct the template in the
> 2.11 docs shortly.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> Trevor
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anthony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 7:00 PM
> Subject: Sustain in midi output of Pia
ject: Sustain in midi output of Piano Centered Dynamics Template
I noticed that sustain information was not getting generated in the
midi file output when using the Piano Centered Dynamics template
located on the lilypond website. I've tried the same template with
2.10.33 as well as 2.11.45.
Th
I noticed that sustain information was not getting generated in the
midi file output when using the Piano Centered Dynamics template
located on the lilypond website. I've tried the same template with
2.10.33 as well as 2.11.45.
This is the current template for the piano centered dyn
Hi Trevor,
Well, there is, although I didn't know it until I went looking!
Yes, you've hit on exactly what I was hoping might be out there... =)
For future reference (e.g., LSR?), I've modified your [lovely]
example to show both outcomes.
Best wishes,
Kieren.
_
Kieren MacMillan wrote on 10 December 2007 14:28
>
> However, it did give me a brainstorm that might
> be helpful: is there
> a way to wrap (by default) every dynamic in a
> white outline? That
> way, the font outline would mask out the barline
> immediately around
> the f (or whatever t
Hi Peter,
Well, thanks for replying, but of course it didn't solve the problem.
I know... sorry.
for one who engraves only piano music, it is the harsh reality that
the results
of lilypond are not that pretty when one has the insane idea of
centering dynamics...
[n.b. Perhaps again here
Hi Peter,
I had tried this before, by adding these three lines to the
Dynamics context
and leaving the rest as in the original template. [...] It does not
prevent collisions
Interesting... well, it was worth a shot. =\
the Barlines do not become transparent where collisions occur.
That
d-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Piano-Centered-Dynamics-and-bar-collision---again-tp13844142p14251815.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archi
TECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org
> Subject: Re: Piano Centered Dynamics and bar
> collision - again
>
>
> Hey Trevor,
>
> > Dynamics placed between piano staves can collide with
> > barlines. It makes no difference whether they are
> > centered
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 11:10:42 -0800 (PST)
peter0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As part of our big documentation update, we'll examine this template...
> > but currently this probably won't happen until March or so. And even
> > then, our answer might simply be to delete the example (if it's not
>
Hey Trevor,
Dynamics placed between piano staves can collide with
barlines. It makes no difference whether they are
centered or not.
Is there any way to apply the lyric trick
\consists "Bar_engraver"
\consists "Separating_line_group_engraver"
\override BarLine #'trans
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> peter0
> Sent: 09 December 2007 14:08
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Piano Centered Dynamics and bar
> collision - again
>
>
>
> Hmm... No r
ue to the google code repository as an
enhancement?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Piano-Centered-Dynamics-and-bar-collision---again-tp13844142p14242040.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
l Lilypond "quite useless"... ;-)
> But otherwise it seemed fine.
>
> Hope you get a satisfactory answer!
> Kieren.
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
Hi Peter,
Did I provide not enough information about the problem
Actual (minimal) code showing the issue is almost always the best way
to communicate your needs to the list.
I don't know if it's relevant, but I have voices switching staffs
in the piece I'm engraving.
Might be -- that
t; Thank you
> peter
>
>
>
>
> peter0 wrote:
> >
> > Hi. I'm a relative new user and I want to write piano centered dynamics
> > without them colliding bar lines. I searched the help and this mailing
> > list but I didn't find a consistent res
:
>
> Hi. I'm a relative new user and I want to write piano centered dynamics
> without them colliding bar lines. I searched the help and this mailing
> list but I didn't find a consistent resolution.
>
> So, can anyone give the right code or a method how I have to do
Hi. I'm a relative new user and I want to write piano centered dynamics
without them colliding bar lines. I searched the help and this mailing list
but I didn't find a consistent resolution.
So, can anyone give the right code or a method how I have to do this?
I don't know i
Hi all,
New to Lilypond and so far quite enjoying myself!
I notice that the dynamics in the Piano Centered Dynamics template are
aligned too far left, giving rise to collision with barlines when they
appear on the first note of a measure.Is it because they aren't attached
to actual
James Bailey wrote:
Thanks, I made the offset 2.5 to match all of the others, but I still
really don't understand all of the engravers and spanners this
template modifies, which makes me kind of sad.
Honestly, I don't think anybody understands exactly why the
template looks as it does. Pro
Thanks, I made the offset 2.5 to match all of the others, but I still
really don't understand all of the engravers and spanners this
template modifies, which makes me kind of sad.
And, is it just me, or did you get the same kind of problem that I
got? Should this be added to the manual, or
Try adding this with the other extra-offsets:
\override DynamicTextSpanner #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 1.75)
Perhaps this can be added to the manual.
-Jay Anderson
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
I'm trying to get piano centered dynamics, and my "cresc." is far
too close to the bottom staff. I'm just modifying the existing
template. My question is, which line of the code do I need to alter
to change this?
following is my offending code (stripped dow
Hello,
as a piano teacher, I chose template D.2.4 "Piano Centered Dynamics" as
my default template. Unfortunately, it contains many advanced commands,
which I don't fully understand, and so it is quite difficult for me to
modify it when its settings don't match my need
Alle 13:19, martedì 31 gennaio 2006, liang seng ha scritto:
> Hi, I am using Lilypond 2.7.27 for Windows 98 and I have a problem putting
> a file which contains piano centered dynamics into a score. The contents of
> the file "piano.ly" are the same as the input file use
Hi, I am using Lilypond 2.7.27 for Windows 98 and I have a problem putting a
file which contains piano centered dynamics into a score. The contents of
the file "piano.ly" are the same as the input file used to generate piano
centered dynamics in the 2.7 documentation file. The file of
Ted Stanion wrote:
I have just started using LilyPond with version 2.4.3 on Cygwin. I modified
the "piano-dynamics.ly" file which I found at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/input/template/out-www/collated-files.html by
First problem: Use the manual for version 2.4, since that's the version
you us
I have just started using LilyPond with version 2.4.3 on Cygwin. I modified
the "piano-dynamics.ly" file which I found at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/input/template/out-www/collated-files.html by
adding an extra measure of music with new dynamics. Specifically, the second
measure has a crescendo t
Thanks for this - I've used it to sort out virtually everything.
Regards
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Matthijs Frankena [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 February 2005 10:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Piano Centered Dynamics
Hello Tim,
Take a look at the following (at Mu
I'm engraving a piece using Lilypond 2.4.2 under XP using the template in
the 2.4 manual
"3.3.4 Piano centered dynamics" on p32.
I would also like to align non-dynamic instructions (e.g. rallentando, a
tempo, perdendosi) between the staves but cannot for the life of me work out
if
74 matches
Mail list logo
