Hello Lukas,
the reason is that you are removing the time signature, but not the \after 4*5
before that. \after is a function that takes 3 arguments: The last one is the
actual music, the middle one is what you want to put there delayed and the
first one is by how much you want to delay it.
So
g breaks. I'm trying to remove those unnecessary time
signatures because they stand out.
[image: image.png]
\version "2.24.4"
makeDPercent =
#(define-music-function (duration) (ly:duration?)
"Make a double percent repeat of given duration."
(make-music 'DoublePerce
e \repeat volta count ...
and \alternative for the voltas. Now here this is a bit complicated, as
essentially the first alternative is actually a repeat.
So instead of using \repeat percent we’ll need to manually place the Percent
repeat signs:
makeDPercent =
#(define-music-function (duration) (ly:
Hello. I'm migrating from Guitar Pro to Lilypond and I'm trying to
replicate something that I've always done in my scores and lead sheets:
[image: image.png]
I'm having a bit of a pickle while trying to recreate this score,
especially because of two factors:
1. Lilypond's way of writing percent rep
> Le 22 sept. 2023 à 15:51, Dr. Thomas Tensi a écrit :
>
> Any ideas whether this shall be put on the official lilypond
> "change request" list?
It's already there. See https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/3146
Dear all,
about 15 years ago there has been a question on (or "request
for") a four bar percent repeat mark.
As far as I see this has not yet been implemented in Lilypond
possibly due to lack of user interest. Nevertheless note that
this seems to be a common notation especially in
I'm seeing an issue if I change time signatures during a percent repeat.
Let's start with a 3 bar snare drum phrase
\version "2.22.0"
snareline = \drummode
{
\time 3/8 sn8[ sn sn]
\time 2/4 sn8[ sn sn sn]
\time 4/4 sn8[ sn sn sn] sn[ sn sn sn]
}
\score
{ << \n
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 08:22, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> Le 16/04/2021 à 23:19, Peter Crighton a écrit :
> > when using \magnifyStaff it seems as though the dots of a percent
> > repeat sign will scale accordingly, but not the slash. I cannot
> > imagine th
Le 16/04/2021 à 23:19, Peter Crighton a écrit :
Hello all,
when using \magnifyStaff it seems as though the dots of a percent
repeat sign will scale accordingly, but not the slash. I cannot
imagine this is expected behaviour.
\version "2.23.2"
{
\magnifyStaff 0.5
\repeat
Hello all,
when using \magnifyStaff it seems as though the dots of a percent repeat
sign will scale accordingly, but not the slash. I cannot imagine this is
expected behaviour.
\version "2.23.2"
{
\magnifyStaff 0.5
\repeat percent 2 {
c'1
}
}
I also could not fin
By default the percent repeat counter does not put a "1" over the bar
which is to be repeated; it starts with a "2" over the first actual
repetition.
This is what is normally required, but for clarity in one particular
instance I would like the repeat counter to put a "
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Aaron Hill
wrote:
> There is a simple workaround, however, which is to attach the articulation
> to an empty chord before the percent repeat:
>
Brilliant!
> The resulting alignment might not be to your taste, as the articulation
> ends up pos
expected Aaron! I also
> wonder why.
>
> I would suggest a slight tweak of the workaround, using a multi measure rest
> to center the up bow:
>
> \version "2.18.2"
> makePercent =
> #(define-music-function (parser location note) (ly:music?)
> "Make a
Interesting that your first idea doesn’t work as expected Aaron! I also wonder
why.
I would suggest a slight tweak of the workaround, using a multi measure rest to
center the up bow:
\version "2.18.2"
makePercent =
#(define-music-function (parser location note) (ly:music?)
"
'articulations (list
(make-music 'ArticulationEvent 'articulation-type "upbow")))
%%
There is a simple workaround, however, which is to attach the
articulation to an empty chord before the percent repeat:
%%
cello = \relative c {
a4(\downbow b c d) |
<&g
Suppose I have a percent repeat. I'd like to place a bowing mark above it.
(I realize this isn't strictly "correct" perhaps.) Is there a way to do
that? My guess to the most promising approach is to use the \makePercent
isolated repeat from
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Do
rest of the instruments don't have repetitive bars. I've have seen this usage
in rock songs for instance.
I see.
I understand the issue of having 2 empty bars and it seems like having a number
above the percent repeat helps.
Example: https://musescore.org/sites/musescore.org/files/fin
27;ve have seen this usage
in rock songs for instance.
I understand the issue of having 2 empty bars and it seems like having a number
above the percent repeat helps.
Example: https://musescore.org/sites/musescore.org/files/finale%20four-bar.jpg
I've found a workaround for th
Am 03.04.2016 um 15:36 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2016-04-02 19:47 GMT+02:00 Daniel E. Moctezuma
:
Hello
I was wondering if it's possible to have a percent repeat with 4
slashes in LilyPond. Like an \override setting or similar. My use
case is when a set of 4 bars repeats n times, like: \r
2016-04-02 19:47 GMT+02:00 Daniel E. Moctezuma :
> Hello
>
> I was wondering if it's possible to have a percent repeat with 4 slashes in
> LilyPond.
> Like an \override setting or similar.
> My use case is when a set of 4 bars repeats n times, like:
> \repeat
Hello
I was wondering if it's possible to have a percent repeat with 4 slashes in
LilyPond.
Like an \override setting or similar.
My use case is when a set of 4 bars repeats n times, like:
\repeat percent 4 { c1 | d | e | f | }
the most I can get is a double percent symbol .//.
is th
Am 30/12/15 um 20:35 schrieb David Kastrup:
Robert Schmaus writes:
Hi David,
as you pointed out a week ago, this works fine:
\version "2.19.18"
\score {
\new Staff
\with {
\accepts "ChordNames"
\consists Percent_repeat_engraver
} {
% some written out music
c'
Robert Schmaus writes:
> Hi David,
>
> as you pointed out a week ago, this works fine:
>
> \version "2.19.18"
>
> \score {
>
> \new Staff
> \with {
> \accepts "ChordNames"
> \consists Percent_repeat_engraver
> } {
> % some written out music
> c''4 c'' c'' c''
>
> % switc
c''4 c'' c'' c''
% switch to changes
\chords {
\set countPercentRepeats = ##t
\set repeatCountVisibility = #(every-nth-repeat-count-visible 4)
\repeat percent 8 { c1 : maj7 }
}
}
}
Everything
7;' c''
>>
>>% switch to changes
>>\chords {
>> \set countPercentRepeats = ##t
>> \set repeatCountVisibility = #(every-nth-repeat-count-visible 4)
>> \repeat percent 8 { c1 : maj7 }
>>}
>> }
aver
> } {
> % some written out music
> c''4 c'' c'' c''
>
> % switch to changes
> \chords {
> \set countPercentRepeats = ##t
> \set repeatCountVisibility = #(every-nth-repeat-count-visible 4)
> \repeat
switch to changes
\chords {
\set countPercentRepeats = ##t
\set repeatCountVisibility = #(every-nth-repeat-count-visible 4)
\repeat percent 8 { c1 : maj7 }
}
}
}
Everything works fine except the Percent Repeat Counter. If I switch
from \chords { ... } to \c
On 29-08-2015 21:56, Thomas Morley wrote:
If you want to stick to LilyPond's markup-commands, I'd suggest to
split construction into steps otherwise it's confusing.
Awesome!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/
2015-08-30 2:16 GMT+02:00 Caio Giovaneti de Barros :
> Thanks guys!
>
> On 28-08-2015 15:26, tisimst wrote:
>>
>> On 8/28/2015 12:18 PM, Stephen MacNeil [via Lilypond] wrote:
>>
>> > how is
>>
>>
>> Nice! That looks like a good one, too! Isn't it great to have this kind
>> of flexibility? I love it
Thanks guys!
On 28-08-2015 15:26, tisimst wrote:
On 8/28/2015 12:18 PM, Stephen MacNeil [via Lilypond] wrote:
> how is
Nice! That looks like a good one, too! Isn't it great to have this kind
of flexibility? I love it!
- Abraham
I'm tinkering here with Stephen's code to try to draw the second
p \percentRepeat}
>
>
> \markup \percentRepeat
>
>
>
>
Nice! That looks like a good one, too! Isn't it great to have this kind
of flexibility? I love it!
- Abraham
--
View this message in context
how is
% inspired by: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=908
\version "2.18.2"
percentRepeat = \markup {
\combine
\translate #'(0.2 . 1.5)
\draw-circle #0.22 #0 ##t
\combine
\translate #'(1.8 . 0.5)
\draw-circle #0.22 #0 ##t
\rotate #90
\tran
Caio,
On 8/28/2015 9:14 AM, Caio Barros [via Lilypond] wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I want to print a double percent repeat inside a markup so I can use
> it as a graphic in a footnote. How can I do that?
>
> I read in the manual -
> lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation
Hello!
I want to print a double percent repeat inside a markup so I can use it
as a graphic in a footnote. How can I do that?
I read in the manual -
lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/short-repeats under
"/Isolated percent repeats" /- that it is possible to prin
iece that has a lot of repeated
>> measures that I would like to notate using the percent repeat symbol
>> with text above it like "8x" or any other arbitrary text.
>>
>> The built-in functionality does not seem to allow for this unless I'm
>> missing somethin
David Bellows wrote
> Hello all,
>
> I'm writing a kind of minimalist piece that has a lot of repeated
> measures that I would like to notate using the percent repeat symbol
> with text above it like "8x" or any other arbitrary text.
>
> The built-in functiona
Hello all,
I'm writing a kind of minimalist piece that has a lot of repeated
measures that I would like to notate using the percent repeat symbol
with text above it like "8x" or any other arbitrary text.
The built-in functionality does not seem to allow for this unless I'm
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> 2013/11/30 Noeck :
> > Hi,
> >
> > is this a bug or is there some reason why this should be correct:
> >
> > If I use a percent repeat in a customly timed measure (5/4 instead of
> &g
On 11/30/2013 12:05 PM, Noeck wrote:
Hi,
is this a bug or is there some reason why this should be correct:
If I use a percent repeat in a customly timed measure (5/4 instead of
4/4), the repeat symbol lacks the dots and is placed to the left of the
bar. If I write something before the repeat
Hi,
2013/11/30 Noeck :
> Hi,
>
> is this a bug or is there some reason why this should be correct:
>
> If I use a percent repeat in a customly timed measure (5/4 instead of
> 4/4), the repeat symbol lacks the dots and is placed to the left of the
> bar. If I write something
Hi,
is this a bug or is there some reason why this should be correct:
If I use a percent repeat in a customly timed measure (5/4 instead of
4/4), the repeat symbol lacks the dots and is placed to the left of the
bar. If I write something before the repeat (a time signature or only
<>), th
Eluze writes:
> David Kastrup wrote
>> Eluze <
>
>> eluzew@
>
>> > writes:
>>
>>> ryanmichaelmcclure wrote
>>>> Is it possible to add either dynamics or markup to a percent repeat? I
>>>> have a measure which is repeate
David Kastrup wrote
> Eluze <
> eluzew@
> > writes:
>
>> ryanmichaelmcclure wrote
>>> Is it possible to add either dynamics or markup to a percent repeat? I
>>> have a measure which is repeated 7 times with the following command:
>>>
&g
Eluze writes:
> ryanmichaelmcclure wrote
>> Is it possible to add either dynamics or markup to a percent repeat? I
>> have a measure which is repeated 7 times with the following command:
>>
>> \repeat percent 7 {a8\p\staccato e'8\staccato a,8\staccato e&#x
ryanmichaelmcclure wrote
> Is it possible to add either dynamics or markup to a percent repeat? I
> have a measure which is repeated 7 times with the following command:
>
> \repeat percent 7 {a8\p\staccato e'8\staccato a,8\staccato e'8\staccato}
>
> I want to add a c
Wow that was simple, thanks for your answers.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
2008/12/11 Luci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Question #1 is :
> - how to simply have the percent without cheating ?
I don't think it's possible.
> - if not possible, how to customize the stencil to have the basic
> percent look ?
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=499
> Question #2 is :
> - on
Hi all,
My question is how to beneficiate of percent in an "repeat volta"
alternative ?
See attached pdf / script.
- First line is what i don't want : having to repeat first measure in
the first alternative
- 2nd is what i want with using the trick of a rest + percent sign stencil
Question #
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 01:17:27AM +, Neil Puttock wrote:
> I think the best option is to make the kerning settings tweakable.
> In fact, there's a TODO in the source suggesting this.
>
> I've just submitted a patch for review; attached is some sample output.
I updated my source and had a pla
Hi Daniel,
2008/11/17 Daniel Hulme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have just got back from a band rehearsal, and tonight for the first
> time I could see what bothers me about Lilypond's percent glyph: the
> dots are too far out. I think they should be horizontally closer to the
> centre, so that the spa
I have just got back from a band rehearsal, and tonight for the first
time I could see what bothers me about Lilypond's percent glyph: the
dots are too far out. I think they should be horizontally closer to the
centre, so that the space between the dot and the oblique stroke is more
like the space
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Reinhold Kainhofer
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:57 AM
To: Mats Bengtsson; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Number over the percent repeat?
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2008 schrieben Sie:
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > Am M
Mats Bengtsson ee.kth.se> writes:
> As I interpreted the question, Stan wants to typeset a "2" over the
> double percent in
> \repeat percent 2 { d8 f4 d8 e4 e | d2 csharp }
> and a "4" in
> \repeat percent 2 { c1 | d | e | f | }
Exactly. Is this possible?
___
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2008 schrieben Sie:
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
> >> Stan Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> In a percent repeat, can I get the number of measures to be repeated
> >>&
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
Stan Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a percent repeat, can I get the number of measures to be repeated
over the double percent sign?
It's the second example in the 2.11 docs.
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
> Stan Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In a percent repeat, can I get the number of measures to be repeated
> > over the double percent sign?
> It's the second example in the 2.11 docs.
While we are at it: I
eers,
- Graham
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:36:06 + (UTC)
Stan Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a percent repeat, can I get the number of measures to be repeated
over the double percent sign?
\time 4/4
\repeat percent 2 { d8 f4 d8 e4 e | d2 csharp }
__
It's the second example in the 2.11 docs.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:36:06 + (UTC)
Stan Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a percent repeat, can I get the number of measures to be repeated
> over the double percent sign?
>
> \time 4/4
> \repeat
In a percent repeat, can I get the number of measures to be repeated over the
double percent sign?
\time 4/4
\repeat percent 2 { d8 f4 d8 e4 e | d2 csharp }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
Hello,
when I use percent repeat and RemoveEmptyStaffContext, lilypond considers the
measures with the percent sign empty and removes them so that there's not staff
left at all, only the bar number stays.
is there a way to tell lilypond to keep at least one staff?
regards,
Tao
--
Is
> try adding \once before the \override, or
>
> do \revert MultiMeasureRest #'print-function
Yup, that works.
Claus
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> I expect that it will also work with 2.2 , you have to add
> \score{\notes {}}.
Yes, it works fine, even in 2.2. However, I need a similar command to turn my
rests back into normal rests. At least in 2.2, this command produces
percent-shaped rests for the remainder of the score.
> I added th
> Maybe I should have started with this question, but what do you need the
> notation for?
>
> If Mats' trick serves you, then it's ok. Otherwise please let me know,
> then I will go ahead with adding the sponsored feature.
I realized that Mats' trick would work in principle, but I don't like it (
Claus Wilke wrote:
I expect that it will also work with 2.2 , you have to add
\score{\notes {}}.
Yes, it works fine, even in 2.2. However, I need a similar command to turn my
rests back into normal rests. At least in 2.2, this command produces
percent-shaped rests for the remainder of the sc
Claus Wilke wrote:
Maybe I should have started with this question, but what do you need the
notation for?
If Mats' trick serves you, then it's ok. Otherwise please let me know,
then I will go ahead with adding the sponsored feature.
I realized that Mats' trick would work in principle, but I d
Claus Wilke wrote:
[percent repeats without body]
as Mats pointed, it is of course possible to get this, just by putting
the last measure of the previous material in the \repeat. Of course,
then you can't do
\fragment
\repeat "percent" 4 { \skip 1 }
\otherFragment
\repeat "perce
4 bars of repeat signs can be
obtained by
c d e f \repeat percent 5 {g a b c}
/Mats
Claus Wilke wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to directly engrave percent repeat signs? As far as I
understand, the percent repeat mechanism always first engraves something
(notes, rests, etc.), and then engraves
Claus Wilke wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to directly engrave percent repeat signs? As far as I
understand, the percent repeat mechanism always first engraves something
(notes, rests, etc.), and then engraves bars with repeat signs. I.e., if I do
\repeat "percent" 4 { r1 }
I get on
Hello,
is it possible to directly engrave percent repeat signs? As far as I
understand, the percent repeat mechanism always first engraves something
(notes, rests, etc.), and then engraves bars with repeat signs. I.e., if I do
\repeat "percent" 4 { r1 }
I get one bar with a rest, and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ishizaki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Hi, I'm using Lilypond 2.4.6 on Linux.
Is there anyway to print repeated number onto the percent sign?
Like this,
2 3 4 5
[music] | % | % | % | % | [another music] |...
Oddly enough, I was thinking of asking the sam
Hi, I'm using Lilypond 2.4.6 on Linux.
Is there anyway to print repeated number onto the percent sign?
Like this,
2 3 4 5
[music] | % | % | % | % | [another music] |...
| Yoshinob
near the one with the grace note. This
can even result in a percent repeat mark at the very beginning of the
line.
Thanks
Dick Schoeller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://schoeller.ne.client2.attb
have not been able to find a
workaround. If one part has precent repeats and another part has
measures that begin with a grace note, then the percent repeats will be
mispositioned in the measures near the one with the grace note. This
can even result in a percent repeat mark at the very beginning o
"Antonio PALAMA'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> O.K. it seems I have to go to 1.5.63. I downloaded the sources and
> tried ./configure (I'm running Debian Woody)
> I get
> configure: error: Cannot find kpathsea functions. You should install
> kpathsea.
>
> I have the Debian package libkpathsea3 i
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Antonio PALAMA' wrote:
> Another question already asked by Atte Jensen:
>
> "What's the best route to follow to have both 1.4.14 and 1.5.63
> installed at the same time? "
Since nobody answered be fore I ran out of patience I just went ahead and
wiped 1.4.14 + installed 1.5.6
Rune Zedeler wrote:
>
> The spacing engine has been rewritten in 1.5.
> In 1.5 the score fits into 5 lines - with 9 "normal" meassures and
> approx 20 percent measures per line.
O.K. it seems I have to go to 1.5.63. I downloaded the sources and tried
./configure (I'm running Debian Woody)
I ge
Antonio PALAMA' wrote:
> Here is a short .ly which shows my problem, I can get 10 ordinary measure
> per line but not more than 8 "percent repeat" measures. There is no
> space saving in using the percent repeat.
The spacing engine has been rewritten in 1.5.
In 1.5 the
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
>I took a look at the output of input/regression/percent-repeat.ly
>(included in the Regression Test document on the WWW site)
>and can't really imagine a narrower percent repeat measure, at least
>for the the single measure repeat.
>
> /Mats
&
Han-Wen wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>>}}"
>>
>>is not usable at all (lots of white space before and after the barline).
>>
>
>I can't duplicate this problem. can you send a small .ly ?
>
I enclose a short .ly which should make clear what I mean;
.dvi and .ps are available should you need
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > > (number of slashes = number of measures.) I've seen numbers on top
> > > > just to help people, i.e.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1 2 3
> > > > % | % | % | etc.
> > >
> > > another version i came across a lot when i used to play in the youth
> > > orchestra
w some
Scheme and postscript.
> I would like to look in the sources to see if I can do something
> to solve the problems outlined in my previous posting about
> percent repeat:
>
> - Too wide percent repeat measures
I took a look at the output of input/regression/percent-repeat.ly
> > > (number of slashes = number of measures.) I've seen numbers on top
> > > just to help people, i.e.
> > >
> > >
> > > 1 2 3
> > > % | % | % | etc.
> >
> > another version i came across a lot when i used to play in the youth
> > orchestra was :
> >
> >8
> > | % |
> >
> > as
On Sat, 2002-06-29 at 12:38, Han-Wen wrote:
> That's more difficult. You would have to look into
> percent-repeat-engraver.cc and percent-repeat-iterator.cc I'm also not
> sure what you really want. AFAIK the syntax for repeating longer
> fragments is
>
> . ///
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > (number of slashes = number of measures.) I've seen numbers on top
> > just to help people, i.e.
> >
> >
> > 1 2 3
> > % | % | % | etc.
>
> another version i came across a lot when i used to play in the youth
> orchestra was :
>
>8
> | % |
>
> as in
Han-Wen wrote:
>>- It is not possible to have multiple precent repeat behave a la "skipBars"
>>
>
>That's more difficult. You would have to look into
>percent-repeat-engraver.cc and percent-repeat-iterator.cc I'm also not
>sure what you really
ed in my previous posting about
> percent repeat:
>
> - Too wide percent repeat measures
check out Spacing_spanner::standard_breakable_column_spacing
> - It is not possible to have multiple precent repeat behave a la "skipBars"
That's more difficult. You would have to loo
\\makebox(0,0){1}}%
\\end{picture}%
}%
}}"
is not usable at all (lots of white space before and after the barline).
Do you have any suggestion to solve the problem?
I would like to look in the sources to see if I can do something
to solve the problems outlined in my previous posting abo
code them - i
>don't know if lilypond supports them or not.
>
>greetings,
>simon.
>
>On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 22:05, Antonio PALAMA' wrote:
>
>>I would like to reduce the default width of the "percent repeat" bars.
>>I tried to figure out which is t
not.
greetings,
simon.
On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 22:05, Antonio PALAMA' wrote:
> I would like to reduce the default width of the "percent repeat" bars.
> I tried to figure out which is the Property that controls this parameter
> but did not find it.
>
> I also miss a fe
I would like to reduce the default width of the "percent repeat" bars.
I tried to figure out which is the Property that controls this parameter
but did not find it.
I also miss a feature which was available with 1.2.17 but has disappeared
with 1.4.X i.e. to have multiple percent repe
90 matches
Mail list logo
