Thank You Guys, you solved my problem!
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Thomas Morley
> Gesendet: Freitag, 20. September 2019 20:55
> An: Richard Shann
> Cc: Matthew Skala ;
> sir.teddy.the.fi...@gmail.com; lilypond-user
> Betreff: Re: Links in PDF-Files
>
Am Fr., 20. Sept. 2019 um 18:53 Uhr schrieb Richard Shann
:
>
> On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 12:26 -0400, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, sir.teddy.the.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Why does lilypond add these links and is there a way to prevent it
> > > from
> > > doing so?
> >
>
On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 12:26 -0400, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, sir.teddy.the.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Why does lilypond add these links and is there a way to prevent it
> > from
> > doing so?
>
> Use the "-dno-point-and-click" option on the command line when you
> run
Insert
\pointAndClickOff
in your ly file.
Kind regards,
Michael
Mobil gesendet
> Am 20.09.2019 um 18:16 schrieb sir.teddy.the.fi...@gmail.com:
>
>
> Hi all,
> whenever I create a pdf document with lilypond, every single note gets a link
> attached to it.
> This link looks something like thi
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, sir.teddy.the.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why does lilypond add these links and is there a way to prevent it from
> doing so?
Use the "-dno-point-and-click" option on the command line when you run
LilyPond to turn off these links. The links are intended to make it
easier to open
Hi all,
whenever I create a pdf document with lilypond, every single note gets a
link attached to it.
This link looks something like this:
"textedit://PathtoMyFile/definitions.ily:1185:38:39"
These links do not really bother me, but there are some applications that
highlight every link in
Hello Stephen,
sounds interesting, but I don’t think there’s any way of judging this
without any examples (code and output).
Yours,
Simon
Am 24.03.2015 um 03:31 schrieb Stephen MacNeil:
the files when i compiled on my linux box render a more compressed
look then those on my friends windows?
the files when i compiled on my linux box render a more compressed look
then those on my friends windows?
same file both have 2.18.2
why?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
for i in *.ly; do lilycrop "$i"; done
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-bottom-of-EPS-output-cut-off-size-of-PDF-files-tp170572p170591.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
shell wildcards, though.
Andrew
https://github.com/andrewacashner/lilypond/
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:04:18 -0700 (MST)
> From: Jayaratna
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Re:bottom of EPS output cut off (+ size of PDF files)
> Message-ID: <
/lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n170551/esempio3064-crop.pdf>
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-bottom-of-EPS-output-cut-off-size-of-PDF-files-tp170524p170551.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive a
message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-bottom-of-EPS-output-cut-off-size-of-PDF-files-tp170524p170538.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.o
e at https://github.com/andrewacashner/lilypond/. Please
test and give feedback!
Thank you to Andrea for the original cropping process (you are
credited in the code).
Best,
Andrew
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:42 AM, wrote:
>2. Re:bottom of EPS output cut off (+ size of PDF files) (Jaya
/Re-bottom-of-EPS-output-cut-off-size-of-PDF-files-tp170186p170497.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Andrew,
this Bash is going to be VERY(!!!) useful for me, thank you VERY(!!!)
much for posting it,
Andrea
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-bottom-of-EPS-output-cut-off-size-of-PDF-files-tp170186p170496.html
Sent from the User mailing list
I wrote earlier about the bug in which Lilypond with the eps backend
inaccurately calculates the bounding box, and Andrea provided a
working solution (thank you).
I turned it into this Bash script, which works well for me, though I
don't understand why this process should be necessary.
Intriguing
On 15.12.2014 14:21, Knut Petersen wrote:
Well, I did some very ugly things to a few postscript / low level scm files
this morning.
Nothing for release, only a proof of concept. These are the results from a
luatex test
page including four small lilypond snippets:
Update:
I generalized my tes
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:33:57 +0600
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> PS is much easier to write than PDF, since PS can be pure text, while PDF
> is always binary, even in „text“ form.
Technically, this is true. Experience has taught me that generating
PostScript via text fragments can easily lead to
Am 2014-12-15 um 17:35 schrieb Urs Liska :
>
> Am 15.12.2014 12:31, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>>> 1) Is it clear that nobody would need Postscript output itself,
>>>e.g. to produce something different than PDF?
>> PDF can be converted back to PS easily.
>>
>>> 2) Is that a feasible goal?
>> W
On 15.12.2014 11:05, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:18:21 +0100
Knut Petersen wrote:
Shall we open a lilypond bug report? I don't know - the generated ps code
is valid and works, so there is no real bug. I think it would be a
feature request.
It's a bit of both. PostScript is muc
Am 15.12.2014 12:31, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
1) Is it clear that nobody would need Postscript output itself,
e.g. to produce something different than PDF?
PDF can be converted back to PS easily.
2) Is that a feasible goal?
Well, it would be a good solution. However, we need a PDF creati
> 1) Is it clear that nobody would need Postscript output itself,
>e.g. to produce something different than PDF?
PDF can be converted back to PS easily.
> 2) Is that a feasible goal?
Well, it would be a good solution. However, we need a PDF creation
library, I guess...
Werner
___
Am 15. Dezember 2014 11:05:59 MEZ, schrieb Johan Vromans :
>On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:18:21 +0100
>Knut Petersen wrote:
>
>> Shall we open a lilypond bug report? I don't know - the generated ps
>code
>> is valid and works, so there is no real bug. I think it would be a
>> feature request.
>
>It's a
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:18:21 +0100
Knut Petersen wrote:
> Shall we open a lilypond bug report? I don't know - the generated ps code
> is valid and works, so there is no real bug. I think it would be a
> feature request.
It's a bit of both. PostScript is much more optimized to deal with normal
's
I suggest you (because you know about that best) write a report to bug-lilypond.
I think this should be opened on our issue tracker,regardless labeling it bug
or enhancement.
Best
Urs
Am 15. Dezember 2014 10:18:21 MEZ, schrieb Knut Petersen
:
>
> you can't suppress subsetting for the Emmen
you can't suppress subsetting for the Emmentaler fonts. Can you send
a bug report to the gs people?
After a first look at the gs code I filed a bugreport:
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695728
And I think the comments to that are quite interesting. AFAICT (which isn't
very au
Am 12.12.2014 11:35, schrieb Knut Petersen:
On 08.12.2014 07:53, Knut Petersen wrote:
On 05.12.2014 20:51, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Now I thought a bit and added "-dSubsetFonts=false" to the gs
parameter list in backend-library.scm. I also changed
lilyponddefs.ps to include white-on-white print
On 08.12.2014 07:53, Knut Petersen wrote:
On 05.12.2014 20:51, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Now I thought a bit and added "-dSubsetFonts=false" to the gs
parameter list in backend-library.scm. I also changed
lilyponddefs.ps to include white-on-white print commands for all the
emmentaler glyphs used in
Am 08.12.2014 07:53, schrieb Knut Petersen:
Why does lilypond think it is a good idea to print a space at origin
using an otherwise unused font?
This is a very good question. IIRC, it comes from headers or footers
added by lilypond. It is obviously not possible to *completely*
disable that, h
On 05.12.2014 20:51, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Now I thought a bit and added "-dSubsetFonts=false" to the gs
parameter list in backend-library.scm. I also changed
lilyponddefs.ps to include white-on-white print commands for all the
emmentaler glyphs used in the four examples (hint: grep, sed, sort &
> Now I thought a bit and added "-dSubsetFonts=false" to the gs
> parameter list in backend-library.scm. I also changed
> lilyponddefs.ps to include white-on-white print commands for all the
> emmentaler glyphs used in the four examples (hint: grep, sed, sort &
> uniq make it easy to get a list o
d
work for Emmentaler also. Have you actually checked that by looking
into the various snippet PDF files produced by lilypond?
Yes, I verified that the Emmentaler-* fonts in lilypond pdfs are only subsets.
Thanks for pointing out that the postscript files contain the full fonts.
I compiled the attache
actually checked that by looking
into the various snippet PDF files produced by lilypond?
> The file notation.pdf of 2.18.2 contains more than 3400 font
> subsets, more than 2000 are subsets of emmentaler-*.otf. Most of
> those could be eliminated, saving serval MB of filesize.
The ques
Hi everybody!
When a lot of lilypond pdfs are included in a *TeX document,
a significant amount of the resulting pdf document is
wasted for differing subsets of fonts.
Identical subsets of fonts can be eliminated by ghostscript,
and ghostscript is also capable to construct an optimal subset
fro
> The full score has 13 pages, but the size of the pdf is only
> 1.30M. If you're running Windows, please use your system's
> built-in fonts (please use a tool to view the real name of the
> font, not the filename). [...]
To be more precise, you should use CJK fonts which don't have embe
Hello,
I'm a Chinese musician, and I know how to produce smaller pdf files. I wrote
a song accompanied by orchestra last year. The full score has 13 pages, but the
size of the pdf is only 1.30M. If you're running Windows, please use your
system's built-in fonts (please use a t
2009/8/23 Daryna Baikadamova :
> Whenever I have CJK characters in the title or composer fields in the
> header, the generated PDF file is always at least 2MB, even if there
> is only one page, but when I remove the CJK characters, it shrunk back
> to about 300kB. How can I control the PDF file si
Whenever I have CJK characters in the title or composer fields in the
header, the generated PDF file is always at least 2MB, even if there
is only one page, but when I remove the CJK characters, it shrunk back
to about 300kB. How can I control the PDF file size?
Thanks!
Daryna
Hi,
I am having some problems when trying to import pdf or ps files
generated from Lilypond into Illustrator... some fonts are not found...
Also when I send some pdfs to be printed in Windows machines with
Acrobat, the dynamics fonts are not found...
It seems to be related to how Adobe apps work
nt: 08/08/23/, 19:57:15
> Subject: Re: Lilypond PDF files
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Galen,
> Such general questions best belong to the lilypond-user mailing list. You can
> use the gmane web frontend for this:
> http://post.gmane.org/
Hash: SHA1
Dear Galen,
Such general questions best belong to the lilypond-user mailing list. You can
use the gmane web frontend for this:
http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general
Am Samstag, 23. August 2008 schrieb Galen Toews:
HI
I am contacting you in regards to the
HI
> I am contacting you in regards to the PDF files that Lilypond's output
> makes. I have aquired a Handheld PDA (Personal Digital Assistant). It is
> possible to load a version of Adobe Reader onto there to look at PDF files.
> When I tried to load a PDF file from Lilypond onto
2007/11/15, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > Since the GDP docs are spread over the LM, NR, AU, and snippets -- not
> > to mention MG and IR -- what about making a tarball / zip which
> > contained all these manuals, and removing the download links for
> > individ
On 15.11.2007 (07:34), Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > Since the GDP docs are spread over the LM, NR, AU, and snippets -- not
> > to mention MG and IR -- what about making a tarball / zip which
> > contained all these manuals, and removing the download links for
> > individu
Graham Percival wrote:
Since the GDP docs are spread over the LM, NR, AU, and snippets -- not
to mention MG and IR -- what about making a tarball / zip which
contained all these manuals, and removing the download links for
individual PDFs? This would avoid problems with people downloading only
- if it is really too big, we
should consider offering some of the parts still seperate (and put the
tarball link next to the download link for the single document).
Greetings
till
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/GDP%3A-keep-separate-pdf-files--tf4808930.html#a13761536
Sent from th
Since the GDP docs are spread over the LM, NR, AU, and snippets -- not
to mention MG and IR -- what about making a tarball / zip which
contained all these manuals, and removing the download links for
individual PDFs? This would avoid problems with people downloading only
the LM and discovering a
On WinXP I have not experienced this. (However, only tried one file from
the 2.8 series - it is smaller now)
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I just noticed that the stable 2.10 has been released, so I updated to
that. I was previously on 2.9.7 or something like that. I notice that
the PDF:s generated with 2.10 are about 25% larger that previously.
Not that it really matters, but I'm curious to what the cause might
be.
And, no, it has
On 1/2/06, Linda Seltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Happy New Year Friends,
>
> Sponsorship
> I tried to send e-mail to the sponsorship address and received an error
> message. Could someone please post information on sponsorship,
> particular, the amount in US dollars, with information on payin
Linda Seltzer wrote:
PDF files
I haven't received replies on this, but one question I have is: what is
the difrerence between Adobe Acrobat and the reader that comes with a
Windows PC? Does Acrobat provide the capability to convert a file from
.pdf format to a format that is readable
tried paypal it didn't
work and I received the error message weeks later with no reason given as
to why it didn't work).
PDF files
I haven't received replies on this, but one question I have is: what is
the difrerence between Adobe Acrobat and the reader that comes with a
Windows PC
Running under Windows 98, LilyPond generates .PS, not .PDF, files for
two independent reasons:
(A) Ghostscript can't find its initialization files.
(B) Once (A) has been cleared up, the long gs... command invoked
by LilyPond.exe fails.
=
Regarding (A)
=
On 2 July
Paul Scott writes:
>>set GS_LIB=C:/PROGRA~1/LILYPOND/USR/share/ghostscript/fonts # ? check
^/lib oops1
>>set GS_FONTHPATH=C:/WINDOWS/FONTS
^oops2
I was in a too big hurry this morning, but hoped you or someone else
would figure
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Paul Scott writes:
After dealing with the ancient DOS shell (command line) here it is.
Thanks.
This also brings up another point that I have seen briefly mentioned
either here or on the devel list. Is there a problem with setting the
environment variabl
Paul Scott writes:
> After dealing with the ancient DOS shell (command line) here it is.
Thanks.
> This also brings up another point that I have seen briefly mentioned
> either here or on the devel list. Is there a problem with setting the
> environment variables so that LilyPond.exe can be fou
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Paul Scott writes:
file and continues processing for a while but creates nothing new. There is
no PDF file. Anyone know why?
I also get no PDF's. I installed the native LilyPond on MS Windows 98SE.
Then probably ghostscript fails. Can someone pleas
Paul Scott writes:
>>file and continues processing for a while but creates nothing new. There is
>>no PDF file. Anyone know why?
>>
> I also get no PDF's. I installed the native LilyPond on MS Windows 98SE.
Then probably ghostscript fails. Can someone please run lilypond with
the --verbose sw
There is a simple.ps file on the desktop but no simple.pdf. I
searched the hard drive and it isn't anywhere else.
Sacha
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sacha Standen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, Jul
essing for a while but creates nothing new. There is
no PDF file. Anyone know why?
Sacha
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sacha Standen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: pdf fil
which is a language used by some printers.
For normal PostScript files, you can install a program like GSView to
view them on the screen in Windows. However, the PostScript files
generated by LilyPond are a bit special and are mainly used as
intermediate files from LilyPond when it prepares the PDF
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sacha Standen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: pdf files
> Sacha Standen wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Please would somebody
Sacha Standen wrote:
Hello
Please would somebody respond with some advice, as I can't use
Lilypond at all without being able to view the PDF files. I'm using
version 2.6 on Windows ME and have managed, through trial and error,
to generate pdf files, but cannot open them. Whe
Hello
Please would somebody respond with some advice, as
I can't use Lilypond at all without being able to view the PDF files. I'm using
version 2.6 on Windows ME and have managed, through trial and error, to
generate pdf files, but cannot open them. When I double click the PDF
Hello
I've still been having problems with the latest
version and have now upgraded to 2.5.31-1 to see if it solves any problems, but
without success.
Now, although I can save files as .ly, when I try
to process this as a PDF file, although it runs bash no new files are
created, so I can
oops, sorry, i didn't reply to te mailing list.
i re-post my reply:
---
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
What LilyPond version do you use?
Hello, thanks for your reply
i use the version 2.4.2
Are you sure it's an ordinary 'u' that fails and not any ú or whatever?
Sounds very strange to me.
If you wish, yo
?
(if it's not possible i will use my debian Sid to get pdf files...
i mostly use Woody but it's not such a big problem)
It moved to nowhere... afavant.elte.hu has been cracked and
now all the servers are taken down. Sorry. If anybody
needs a post-2.4.2 package for Woody, please speak
Tanguy Léost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems i have a problem with the font in the pdf files:
> everything looks fine, except for the letter 'u' in the
> titles, which looks weird. This appears only in the pdf
> file, the ps file looks very nice.
Yep, you are
t's hard to say what could be the problem.
/Mats
Tanguy Léost wrote:
Hello,
I run lilypond on a debian woody. I am very pleased with this software
(big
thanks to all the people involved in this project, it's *great* :-)
It seems i have a problem with the font in the pdf files: everythin
Hello,
I run lilypond on a debian woody. I am very pleased with this software (big
thanks to all the people involved in this project, it's *great* :-)
It seems i have a problem with the font in the pdf files: everything
looks fine, except
for the letter 'u' in the titles, which lo
I'm running SP2 with Lilypond 2.2.5/Cygwin with no problems.
- James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Did you, by chance, have a previous version of the PDF file open
in Acrobat when you processed the file. If you have that, LilyPond
(or rather ps2pdf called by LilyPond) will not be able to save the
file and you will get error messages.
/Mats
Peter Shand wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded LilyPond a few we
I have SP2 installed and everything works fine.
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PDF Files
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:55:35 +0100
Hi,
I downloaded LilyPond a few weeks ago, tested it (using the test.ly
download) and all was well. Now I find that it will process files but not
convert them to pdf/ps/dvi and not save them.
The only major change in my se
Hi,
I downloaded LilyPond a few weeks ago, tested it (using the test.ly
download) and all was well. Now I find that it will process files but
not convert them to pdf/ps/dvi and not save them.
The only major change in my set up in the intervening time was
installing SP2 (obviously I'm using Wind
Ok, that's a good idea. Perhaps windows downloading guidelines should be
updated too?
Bert
> Why do we direct these problem reports to bug-lilypond instead of
> lilypond-user? 9 times out of 10, it's a matter of simple beginners
> errors. Of course the intention is to design the program and the
>
Why do we direct these problem reports to bug-lilypond instead of
lilypond-user? 9 times out of 10, it's a matter of simple beginners
errors. Of course the intention is to design the program and the
documentation so these mistakes or misunderstandings are avoided in
the future, but still I feel tha
There should be a test.log file in the same folder with test.ly. Please send
it to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED] along
with some words about your problem.
Thanks,
Bert
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org
exe (I use WinXP). It looks to me that the program works fine, but it only generates TEX files. Am I missing some switches or programs to generate pdf files?
Best wishes,
Juhani Valtasalmi
-
WIN FREE WORLDWIDE FLIGHTS - nominate a cafe in the Yahoo! Mail Internet C
witches or programs to generate pdf
> files?
Are you using lilypond or lilypond-book on a .tex file for your command?
lilypond should generate a ps and pdf format. Now, you may need to include a
\paper {} block in your \score... but really, I'm a newbie just saw that you
had
Hi!
I'm having trouble generating from LY to PDF. I downloaded stable version 2.0.1 with
Cygwin's setup.exe (I use WinXP). It looks to me that the program works fine, but it
only generates TEX files. Am I missing some switches or programs to generate pdf files?
Best wishes,
Juhani
81 matches
Mail list logo
