On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> It's all sorted. See the selected snippets for easy noteheads.
Oh, I see. Good to know people here are more reliable than me :)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.
On 2 March 2010 16:27, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> where are we with regard to this feature (see below)? It would be nice
> to have it somewhere, either as a snippet or... you name it ;)
It's all sorted. See the selected snippets for easy noteheads.
Cheers,
Neil
_
Guys,
where are we with regard to this feature (see below)? It would be nice
to have it somewhere, either as a snippet or... you name it ;)
Cheers,
Valentin
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:57 PM, pound...@lineone.net
wrote:
> #(define ez-numbers-engraver (list
> (cons 'acknowledgers
> (list
>
2010/1/10 Patrick Horgan :
> on 2.13.11 built from trunk. I do get an output with pretty numbered note
> heads though.
The Scheme_engraver wasn't added until yesterday, so you probably need
to update your local repository and rebuild.
Regards,
Neil
pound...@lineone.net wrote:
... elision by patrick ...
This:
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\consists \ez-numbers-engraver
}
}
Gives this error:
numerNoteHeads2.ly:29:14: error: syntax error, unexpected
SCM_IDENTIFIER, expecting STRING
\consists
\ez-numbers-eng
2010/1/10 pound...@lineone.net :
> Actually, the new scheme engraver functionality is so good that the
> code below seems to do the trick.
Great!
> Unfortunately, it doesn't demonstrate
> very much of what can be done with engravers,
Well, I did say it would be a gentle introduction. :)
> but
>Original Message
>From: pound...@lineone.net
>Date: 10/01/2010 19:46
>To:
>Cc: "Ian Hulin", "lilypond-user@gnu.org", "fr...@lilynet.net",
>Subj: Re: [frogs] Re: Numeric note heads for singers
>
>
>
>>Original Message
>Original Message
>From: n.putt...@gmail.com
>Date: 10/01/2010 19:16
>To: "pound...@lineone.net"
>Cc: "Ian Hulin", "fr...@lilynet.net", "lilypond-user@gnu.org",
>Subj: Re: [frogs] Re: Numeric note heads for singers
>
>2010
2010/1/10 pound...@lineone.net :
> Could you try running the lily source below which I think provides a
> simple means to the same end and could be turned into a snippet? If you
> then still think it would be useful to have this automated, I'll
> continue where I left off.
If you want to automate
>From a teaching point of view:
the "mi" (diamond/lozenge) is unique,
so it doesn't need a number.
Would dice-like dots be better than numbers, I wonder.
the "fa" (triangle) is the main source of confusion.
In major, fa is both "1" (tonic") and "4" (subdom).
In minor/dorian, fa is both "3" and
>Original Message
>From: c_soren...@byu.edu
>Date: 10/01/2010 15:39
>To: "Ian Hulin"
>Cc: "pound...@lineone.net", "lilypond-u...@gnu.
org", "fr...@lilynet.net"
>Subj: Re: [frogs] Re: Numeric note heads for singers
>
&g
On 1/10/10 4:52 AM, "Ian Hulin" wrote:
> Hi Carl and everyone,
>
> This looks a good idea in principle, but you've got to address what I call the
> tonic-sol-fa/solfeggio problem.
> You have to consider all of these (and I may have missed a few)
> 1. What is your base-level tonic?
> 2. what m
From: da...@thirdculture.com
Date: 09/01/2010 19:01
To: "Carl Sorensen"
Cc: "fr...@lilynet.net",
"lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subj: Re: [frogs] Re: Numeric note heads for singers
Carl, pounderd, and others,
I like the idea of "frogs" picking up an idea like this.
But,
On 1/9/10 12:50 PM, "pound...@lineone.net" wrote:
>
>
>> Original Message
>> From: da...@thirdculture.com
>> Date: 09/01/2010 19:01
>> To: "Carl Sorensen"
>> Cc: "fr...@lilynet.net",
>> "lilypond-user@gnu
Original Message
From: da...@thirdculture.com
Date: 09/01/2010 19:01
To: "Carl Sorensen"
Cc: "fr...@lilynet.net",
"lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subj: Re: [frogs] Re: Numeric note heads for singers
Carl, pounderd, and others,
I like the idea of &
Carl, pounderd, and others,
I like the idea of "frogs" picking up an idea like this.
But, it's not real high priority, and in graphix-rendition terms it would be
difficult to inscribe a "4" into the triangular "pennant" shape of "fa"
because the triangle points in the opposite direction from the
On 1/3/10 12:22 PM, "pound...@lineone.net" wrote:
> I might be misunderstanding the request, but couldn't it be done with
>
> \override Voice . NoteHead #'note-names = #(vector "1" "2" "3" "4" "5"
> "6" "7")
> \easyHeadsOn .
>
> adjusting the numbers depending on the key
This wou
he key
?
>Original Message
>From: c_soren...@byu.edu
>Date: 03/01/2010 17:00
>To: "David Olson", "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
>Cc: "Lilypond Bugreports", "fr...@lilynet.net"
>Subj: Re: Numeric note heads for singers
>
>
>
&
On 1/3/10 1:35 AM, "David Olson" wrote:
>
> (1) Easy notation for singers
>
> The easy notation feature is designed for instrumentalists:
>
> <
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Note-heads#Easy-nota
> tion-note-heads>
>
> i.e., it inscribes the letter value insid
Mr Olson,
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of David
Olson
Sent: Sun 03/01/2010 8:35
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Numeric note heads for singers
Where I'm having frustrations:
<http://www.hosorembo.com/Laura/Conque
(1) question
(2) self-introduction
(1) Easy notation for singers
The easy notation feature is designed for instrumentalists:
<
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Note-heads#Easy-notation-note-heads
>
i.e., it inscribes the letter value inside the notehead.
Is there a way
21 matches
Mail list logo
