On Thursday 15 January 2004 17:11, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Thursday 15 January 2004 20.55, Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões
wrote:
> > In the other hand, to unfold them makes the paper output to be
> > unfolded too :(
>
> There is a dirty trick:
> 1. Put your notes in their own file (say notes.ly,
Why making it so complicated, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/input/test/out-www/collated-files.html#unfold-all-repeats.ly
for a simpler solution.
/Mats
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Thursday 15 January 2004 20.55, Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
In the other hand, to unfold them makes the pap
Hi Alberto,
If what you want is to have the paper output folded and the midi output
unfolded, then you can use separate score blocks within the one file for
each purpose.
For example use something like:
\score { \notes
\context ChoirStaff = All <<
\Soprano
On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:18, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
> Hello, Alberto:
> > if we write repetitions on the music (and if the composer wrote
> > them) it means we want to repeat them. Why to add a new command to
> > unfold them?
>
> It's really just a short hand for editing purposes
Ex
Hello, Alberto:
if we write repetitions on the music (and if the composer wrote them)
it means we want to repeat them. Why to add a new command to unfold
them?
It's really just a short hand for editing purposes, at least as I've
used it so far.
For example, when defining line breaks, rather tha
On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:54, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> One main reason not to include the repetitions by default is that
> the MIDI generation in LilyPond is mainly intended for "proof
> reading" a score. The ambition has never been to make a fullfledged
> sequencer with professional MIDI outpu
On Thursday 15 January 2004 20.55, Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
> In the other hand, to unfold them makes the paper output to be unfolded
> too :(
>
There is a dirty trick:
1. Put your notes in their own file (say notes.ly, which puts all the notes of
your score into the variable YourNote
One main reason not to include the repetitions by default is that
the MIDI generation in LilyPond is mainly intended for "proof reading"
a score. The ambition has never been to make a fullfledged sequencer
with professional MIDI output.
/Mats
Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
Hi
I found
http
In the other hand, to unfold them makes the paper output to be unfolded
too :(
But, as it is at the moment, I think lilypond can only win having midi
output :)
Alb
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:54, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> One main reason not to include the repetitions by default is that
> the MIDI ge
Hi
I found
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/input/test/out-www/lily-429032051.ly,
the example for unfolding repeats, and it works (great!)
My question is: if we write repetitions on the music (and if the
composer wrote them) it means we want to repeat them. Why to add a new
command to unfold them? Wou
10 matches
Mail list logo
