In the other hand, to unfold them makes the paper output to be unfolded too :(
But, as it is at the moment, I think lilypond can only win having midi output :) Alb On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:54, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > One main reason not to include the repetitions by default is that > the MIDI generation in LilyPond is mainly intended for "proof reading" > a score. The ambition has never been to make a fullfledged sequencer > with professional MIDI output. > > /Mats > > Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote: > > Hi > > I found > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/input/test/out-www/lily-429032051.ly, > > the example for unfolding repeats, and it works (great!) > > > > My question is: if we write repetitions on the music (and if the > > composer wrote them) it means we want to repeat them. Why to add a new > > command to unfold them? Wouldn't it be better to oposite? (a flag if you > > do not want to unfold at all?) > > > > Just my five cents. > > Alberto > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lilypond-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
