One main reason not to include the repetitions by default is that
the MIDI generation in LilyPond is mainly intended for "proof reading"
a score. The ambition has never been to make a fullfledged sequencer
with professional MIDI output.

/Mats

Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
Hi
I found
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/input/test/out-www/lily-429032051.ly,
the example for unfolding repeats, and it works (great!)

My question is: if we write repetitions on the music (and if the
composer wrote them) it means we want to repeat them. Why to add a new
command to unfold them? Wouldn't it be better to oposite? (a flag if you
do not want to unfold at all?)

Just my five cents.
Alberto



_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================



_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to