Hi,
First of all, currently I'm testing and developing LilyPondTool with jEdit
4.4.2.
I'm using the MyDoggy plugin to have better dockable windows, so that might
affect the behavior, you could try as well.
But anyway, please create a bug report at
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?grou
I submitted the following to the lily4jedit-user list this morning, but it
doesn't seem that that list gets much traffic. So I thought I would submit it
here, too, in the hopes that someone knows how to fix my problem.
> This morning I was running jEdit 4.3.1 with a 2.12.xxx ve
MING TSANG wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> How about lilypond v2.14.2 or v2.15.14?
The architecture has not changed.
--
Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailm
gt; *From:* Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
> *To:* MING TSANG
> *Cc:* Francisco Vila ; "
> lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org" ; "
> lilypond-user@gnu.org"
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 22, 2011 1:43:32 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: lilypond and jedit
>
> yes, you can just copy
October 22, 2011 1:43:32 PM
>Subject: Re: lilypond and jedit
>
>yes, you can just copy java and jedit to it and change jedit.bat to
>use the javaw.exe from the usb drive. Also set jedit to install
>plugins to the application directory.
>
yes, you can just copy java and jedit to it and change jedit.bat to
use the javaw.exe from the usb drive. Also set jedit to install
plugins to the application directory.
On 10/22/11, MING TSANG wrote:
> Sorry! It is window 7.
>
>
>
>
>
>>___
Sorry! It is window 7.
>
>From: Francisco Vila
>To: MING TSANG
>Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org" ;
>"lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org"
>Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 12:27:56 PM
>Subject: Re: lilypond and jedi
El 22/10/2011 14:57, "MING TSANG" escribió:
>
> Hi, lily users:
>
> A general question. Can lilypond and jedit be installed in an USB thumb
drive? What would happen about the PATH?
>
Which operative system are we talking about?
Hi, lily users:
A general question. Can lilypond and jedit be installed in an USB thumb drive?
What would happen about the PATH?
Blessing,
Ming.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
On 26/06/11 19:03, Helge Kruse wrote:
Hello,
some times ago, LilypondTool was sticked to a specific jEdit version
(4.3pre16). Does the limitation still exists or can I use a newer
jEdit version?
It's working fine on my machine with jEdit 4.4.1. The version of
Lilypondtool I'
Hello,
For what it looks, LilypondTool seems to work well with JEdit 4.4.1 release.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/LilypondTool-and-jEdit-version-tp31929980p31930007.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hello,
some times ago, LilypondTool was sticked to a specific jEdit version
(4.3pre16). Does the limitation still exists or can I use a newer jEdit
version?
Regards,
Helge
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
Which OS are you using?
What is the exact message?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Michael Dykes wrote:
> Thanks, Nick. That solved one prob, but brought up another. Not I get the
> errorjava.io IOException:error=20
> when I try to compile. Any thoughts? Thanks again.
>
>
>
>
>
> __
Thanks, Nick. That solved one prob, but brought up another. Not I get the
errorjava.io IOException:error=20
when I try to compile. Any thoughts? Thanks again.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
On 18/04/11 17:47, Michael Dykes wrote:
Nick Payne internode.on.net> writes:
In the options for Lilypondtool in jEdit (Plugins / Plugin Options
/LilypondTool / Commands), do you have the correct path to the Lilypond
binary. You should also have the jEdit SideKick plugin installed and
Nick Payne internode.on.net> writes:
> In the options for Lilypondtool in jEdit (Plugins / Plugin Options
> /LilypondTool / Commands), do you have the correct path to the Lilypond
> binary. You should also have the jEdit SideKick plugin installed and the
> option "Parse o
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Michael Dykes
wrote:
I just started using JEdit and the LilypondTools provided as a plug-in for
that editor. Everytime I use it though, I keep getting the follwoing error:
java.io IOException:error=2, No such file or directory - Any help
resolving this would be
Hello Michael,
I know next to nothing about JEdit, except that it installed on my
(Windows) system without any difficulty. No-one else has replied, so I
thought I'd mention that a few more details are probably required
before anyone can help. It would appear that JEdit is not finding a
nece
I just started using JEdit and the LilypondTools provided as a plug-in for
that editor. Everytime I use it though, I keep getting the follwoing error:
java.io IOException:error=2, No such file or directory - Any help
resolving this would be appreciated. Thanks.
--
In Christ,
Michael D
Am 17.01.2011 um 20:40 schrieb Arle Lommel:
Thank you Patrick, but I should have made it clear, *that* was the
item that kept serving me up the old version of the file as a
preview, even after saving and making changes. Running the “Run
Lilypond” botton, per Bert’s suggestion, however, see
Thank you Patrick, but I should have made it clear, *that* was the item that
kept serving me up the old version of the file as a preview, even after saving
and making changes. Running the “Run Lilypond” botton, per Bert’s suggestion,
however, seems to take care of the issue.
-Arle
On Jan 17,
Am 17.01.2011 um 20:17 schrieb Arle Lommel:
Hi all,
Just started using jEdit and lilypondtool today on Mac OS X because
I liked the idea of the PDF Preview and the integration between it
and the editor. However, in trying it out, I find that once I first
invoke the preview function it
Hi all,
Just started using jEdit and lilypondtool today on Mac OS X because I liked the
idea of the PDF Preview and the integration between it and the editor. However,
in trying it out, I find that once I first invoke the preview function it won't
update for me, so I can't see any c
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Adam Good wrote:
> Maybe it's been addressed somewhere but if you don't mind me asking
> how will deutsch or nederlands languages be called up in the future?
> Will the .ly files fall away?
.ly files will be kept for quite a while, I think. The reason behind
this
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Adam Good wrote:
>> Carl, can you elaborate on that? I just installed 2.13.43 and still
>> see deutsch.ly , english.ly etc in
>>
>> lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly
>
> If you look inside these fil
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Adam Good wrote:
> Carl, can you elaborate on that? I just installed 2.13.43 and still
> see deutsch.ly , english.ly etc in
>
> lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly
If you look inside these files, you'll see that they are now empty.
The note names are defined in
Carl, can you elaborate on that? I just installed 2.13.43 and still
see deutsch.ly , english.ly etc in
lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly
thanks!
Adam
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> P.S. this changes in 2.13.4x; the note names are all in the file
> scm/define-note
On 12/21/10 8:48 AM, "Music Teacher" wrote:
> Where are the deutsch.ly, italian.ly etc. I would like to have a look there.
> Thanks
> Francois
>
The files are in the ly/ subdirectory of your lilypond installation. I
can't say where lilypond is installed on your system. But you should be able
t
Where are the deutsch.ly, italian.ly etc. I would like to have a look there.
Thanks
Francois
2010/12/21, Adam Good :
> Bertalan,
> Thanks for writing. So there's no way for me to use a midi keyboard
> for note entry while using makam.ly to get those pitch names correct?
>
> Best,
> Adam
>
> On Mon
Bertalan,
Thanks for writing. So there's no way for me to use a midi keyboard
for note entry while using makam.ly to get those pitch names correct?
Best,
Adam
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
wrote:
> Currently LilyPondTool doesn't support custom note names in the w
Currently LilyPondTool doesn't support custom note names in the wizard and
the piano input.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Adam Good wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm just now checking out LilyPondTool and have a couple of newbie
> questions regarding midi input.
>
> It looks like the Score Setup Wizard
someone else suggested, you put this in a file, and then include it at the
beginning, and that brings your customization to each project.
Paul Thompson
From: Adam Good
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Mon, December 20, 2010 9:32:15 AM
Subject: Tweaking Jedit
Hi, i was looking in /usr/share/lilypond/2.12.3/ly/ and saw that there are
diferent standards..maybe you can use one file as a example and create your
own and save it as turkish.ly and then include it in lilypond file with
\include trukish.ly
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Adam Good wrote:
>
Hi All,
I'm just now checking out LilyPondTool and have a couple of newbie
questions regarding midi input.
It looks like the Score Setup Wizard is the place to set up which
language you would like the pitches to be notated as (cis vs. cs,
etc). Ok fine but I would like to use my own pitch names si
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: Gerard McConnell
Datum: 14. Oktober 2010 00:17:58 MESZ
An: Patrick Schmidt
Betreff: Re: a JEdit/LilyPondTool behaviour
Excellent, that did the trick. The path had parentheses in it -
folder(9)
Many thanks Patrick.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:26 PM
2010/10/13 Gerard McConnell :
> Hello,
> Just wondering about a behaviour when I'm using the PDF viewer in the
> excellent JEdit/LilyPondTool.
> With some scores, when I click on a note in the PDF I am returned to that
> note in the
> .ly file; with other scores this does n
e PDF viewer in
the excellent JEdit/LilyPondTool.
With some scores, when I click on a note in the PDF I am returned
to that note in the
.ly file; with other scores this does not occur. In both cases I
have the "Follow caret" check box
selected. Why does this happen, and can I ensu
Hello,
Just wondering about a behaviour when I'm using the PDF viewer in the
excellent JEdit/LilyPondTool.
With some scores, when I click on a note in the PDF I am returned to that
note in the
.ly file; with other scores this does not occur. In both cases I have the
"Follow caret&
Thank you Bertalan. I did a search on c: drive for the .pdf file and cannot
locate it anywhere.
From: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
To: MING TSANG
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Fri, September 24, 2010 6:35:14 AM
Subject: Re: Jedit with lilypond tools
Perhaps that version of LilyPond puts the PDF in a different directory
than the .ly file is in
MING TSANG wrote:
I use jedit with lilypond tool. I also use lilypond 2.13.33 The
console has the following message. However, I cannot locate the .pdf
file. I do a search on c:\ drive and cannot
Thank you Phil.
I put the line in to .ly Now .PS file is created but there is still no .PDF
file generated.
From: Phil Holmes
To: MING TSANG ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 12:38:34 PM
Subject: Re: Jedit with lilypond tools
In
-option 'delete-intermediate-files #f)"
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: MING TSANG
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:28 AM
Subject: Jedit with lilypond tools
I use jedit with lilypond tool. I also use lilypond 2.13.33 The c
I use jedit with lilypond tool. I also use lilypond 2.13.33 The console has the
following message. However, I cannot locate the .pdf file. I do a search on
c:\
drive and cannot find the file. I see the midi file. One additional question:
on v2.12 after running lilypond, I can see three
am just about ready to give up. I think it may be a Mac thing. But this
is too much effort to waste on something that should be so simple. Under
JEdit/PlugIns/PlugIn Options, I put the whole specific path:
/Volumes/Macintosh HD/Applications/LilyPond 2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/
You'd
Hi Seth,
just cut an paste the following line into "Path to LilyPond binary":
/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/
This should solve your problem.
HTH,
patrick
Am 07.09.2010 um 15:56 schrieb Seth Williamson:
I got the following reply from the other list. But I'm still
getting
I got the following reply from the other list. But I'm still getting
errors. Can anybody on this list tell me what the problem is?
Seth Williamson
I am still getting errors. I cut and pasted your line into "Path to
LilyPond binary":
Error running external command
See the activity log about t
Hello,
I think it's because when you install JEdit for the first time on a Mac, the
path for Lilypond is set to "C:/Program Files/" etc.
I think you just have to remove any path (first field).
If it doesn't work, you can put this one, as your Lilypond app is located
Williamson
OK, I am having the most basic problem imaginable with getting LilyPond and
LilyPond Tool to work together with JEdit on my MacBook Pro.
When I go to Process/View and choose Run LilyPond, I get a variety of
errors. I think they come down to not getting the path and/or start command
co
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
wrote:
>
> The internal MIDI player uses a cross-platform MIDI engine, built in Java.
> External MIDI players are not yet supported.
>
>
>
>
> aaah, right. So if the internal midi doesn't play (or more accurately
> the transport runs,
The internal MIDI player uses a cross-platform MIDI engine, built in Java.
External MIDI players are not yet supported.
aaah, right. So if the internal midi doesn't play (or more accurately
the transport runs, but no sound) then i'm missing a module or plugin
to get sound, or see a port
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
wrote:
> alex stone wrote:
>>
>> lilypond version 2.13.25
>> lilypondtool version (D/L direct from jedit plugin repo) 2.12.894
>>
>> I've been working all day on trying to get the internal midi p
alex stone wrote:
lilypond version 2.13.25
lilypondtool version (D/L direct from jedit plugin repo) 2.12.894
I've been working all day on trying to get the internal midi player in
jedit/lilypondtool to work with timidity. (as lilypondtool has no
jackmidi as yet)
No luck so far. I have tim
lilypond version 2.13.25
lilypondtool version (D/L direct from jedit plugin repo) 2.12.894
I've been working all day on trying to get the internal midi player in
jedit/lilypondtool to work with timidity. (as lilypondtool has no
jackmidi as yet)
No luck so far. I have timidity running as an
though it seems that you have
> something wrong with your LilyPondTool installation. Do you have the latest
> jEdit (4.3pre18 I think) and latest LilyPondTool?
>
> Pressing the backslash should open the autocompletion:
>
>
>
> It only autocompletes, if it can only find 1 possible
In the next version this will work better, though it seems that you
have something wrong with your LilyPondTool installation. Do you have
the latest jEdit (4.3pre18 I think) and latest LilyPondTool?
Pressing the backslash should open the autocompletion:
It only autocompletes, if it can
I'm using the Lilypond Tool with jEdit and every time I hit the
backslash keep it auto-completes it with \refrainMelody.
While that is a variable in my file, I really don't want it every time
I hit backslash.
How do I turn this
Yes, by default the jEdit settings folder is c:\documents and
settings\username\.jedit
Under that there is a file called properties - this contains all your
individual settings.
The jars folder contains all the plugins.
So generally you need only two of these to replicate the same
installation
2009/12/19 chip :
> Excellent, that's what I hoping for.
> Thanks,
> chip
> I don't see a settings folder, did find a settings-backup folder buried
> under Documents and Settings etc etc etc.
> Can I just copy the entire .jedit folder from that directory and paste
>
Excellent, that's what I hoping for.
Thanks,
chip
Aaron Dalton wrote:
On 18/12/2009 5:31 PM, chip wrote:
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/12/18 chip :
Is it possible to just download everything needed to make an install
disk
that includes jedit/lilypondtool/other plugins (I
On 18/12/2009 5:31 PM, chip wrote:
> Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2009/12/18 chip :
>>
>>> Is it possible to just download everything needed to make an install
>>> disk
>>> that includes jedit/lilypondtool/other plugins (I have 17 plugins
>>> instal
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/12/18 chip :
Is it possible to just download everything needed to make an install disk
that includes jedit/lilypondtool/other plugins (I have 17 plugins
installed)? I want to get a computer that has no internet connection set up
for working on music and lily
2009/12/18 chip :
> Is it possible to just download everything needed to make an install disk
> that includes jedit/lilypondtool/other plugins (I have 17 plugins
> installed)? I want to get a computer that has no internet connection set up
> for working on music and lily.
Windows or
less I am
really missing something here.
chip wrote:
> Is it possible to just download everything needed to make an install
> disk that includes jedit/lilypondtool/other plugins (I have 17 plugins
> installed)? I want to get a computer that has no internet connection set
> up fo
Is it possible to just download everything needed to make an install
disk that includes jedit/lilypondtool/other plugins (I have 17 plugins
installed)? I want to get a computer that has no internet connection set
up for working on music and lily.
Thanks,
chip
Well, it's already been fixed in jEdit SVN.
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
Yes, I found now: that's a bug in the installer. I'm going to report it.
Bert
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/11/6 Chris Angelico :
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, joe ferguson wrote:
T
Yes, I found now: that's a bug in the installer. I'm going to report it.
Bert
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/11/6 Chris Angelico :
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, joe ferguson wrote:
The console says:
jedit -Xms2m -Xma8M
Invalid initial heap size: -XmsM
This
2009/11/6 Chris Angelico :
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, joe ferguson wrote:
>> The console says:
>>
>> jedit -Xms2m -Xma8M
>> Invalid initial heap size: -XmsM
This means that JAVA_HEAP_INIT_SIZE is empty. I had this problem and
solved it by writing
JAVA_HEAP_
What does the jedit script contain?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, joe ferguson wrote:
> The console says:
>
> jedit -Xms2m -Xma8M
> Invalid initial heap size: -XmsM
I notice you have a case difference there. What happens if you use
either both lowercase or both uppercase trailing M's? Or, what if you
leave th
The console says:
jedit -Xms2m -Xma8M
Invalid initial heap size: -XmsM
for many values of Xms, Xmx
joe
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
> jEdit 4.3pre17 is needed with the Sun JDK.
> What do you mean by "doesn't like"? It displays a "oh, I don't like
>
jEdit 4.3pre17 is needed with the Sun JDK.
What do you mean by "doesn't like"? It displays a "oh, I don't like that
parameter, that's so smelly" message?
Bert
joe ferguson wrote:
I am also trying to run jedit since readinf the recent post. But I get
stuck
I am also trying to run jedit since readinf the recent post. But I get
stuck right off the bat when java startup doesn't like the Xms command
line parameter -- no value seems to do it.
opensuse linux 11.1(64 bit), jrt 1.6. KDE4
Stephen Corey wrote:
>
J. wrote:
B.H.
I iherited a linux computer full of lilypond files and I was told that I
have to set up3 editors here [jedit
B.H.
I iherited a linux computer full of lilypond files and I was told that I have
to set up3 editors here [jedit emacs vim].
I
It clearly shows I think, that there is nothing wrong with the pretty
name "GNU LilyPond" (yes, without the ugly underscore), but the nsis
script should be written to use LilyPond and not the ugly GNU_LilyPond
as installation folder.
Though I very strongly object to having the meaningless, con
; >>> Processing time: 3 seconds
> >>>
> >>> All the files convert and compile OK under the command line, and
files
> >>> that used to compile return the same errors.
> >>>
> >>> Have these files moved or something?
> >
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> If everything is based on the existence of a given directory, then all
>> is clear. I believed that the registry had something to do.
No, it only checks for the dir:
http://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/master/nsis/lilypond.nsi#L79
> Actu
Francisco Vila wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:12 PM
2009/10/11 Trevor Daniels :
You don't need to uninstall; rename works
fine if you want to keep the previous around.
I didn't know that the installer could be fooled that easy. I
rather
remember the opposite: the installer refusing to coop
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> And here is a patch to revert the change.
This is similar to the patch I posted earlier -- except that yours does work :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
From 2dbcd7705dcfaa93eedf9df8eb50616d4503a885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty
Dat
On 2009-10-11, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2009-10-11, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels
> > wrote:
> > > I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain
> > > the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep
> > > o
On 2009-10-11, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain
> > the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep
> > old versions readily to hand. This seems to be the di
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain
> the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep
> old versions readily to hand. This seems to be the difference
> between our experiences.
That must be
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 7:42 PM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:59 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer-
changed.
This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install
under
Windows. Th
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:59 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed.
This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under
Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's what
2009/10/11 Trevor Daniels :
> You don't need to uninstall; rename works
> fine if you want to keep the previous around.
I didn't know that the installer could be fooled that easy. I rather
remember the opposite: the installer refusing to cooperate even after
having uninstalled a previous version.
Francisco Vila wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 3:54 PM
2009/10/11 Hajo Dezelski :
Could be, but as far as I remember it is recommended, that you
uninstall the old version before you install the knew one.
It is not only recommended, you can not install the new version
without previously unins
2009/10/11 Hajo Dezelski :
> Could be, but as far as I remember it is recommended, that you
> uninstall the old version before you install the knew one.
It is not only recommended, you can not install the new version
without previously uninstalling the old one, because the installer
refuses to con
Hello,
I had the same problem and changed the directory in JEdit. If it is
reversed to only Liliypond, I hope someone will write it in this list.
Has the installation descripition in the documentation been changed?
> However, it seems the default directory name is actually picked
> up fr
Nick Payne wrote Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:59 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed.
This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under
Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's
what
I misunderstood. Th
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Ahh - I see what you mean. The name of the -installer- changed.
This doesn't affect anything when doing a straight install under
Windows. The default install directory is unaffected. That's what
I misunderstood. Thanks Valentin.
No, I installed 2.13.4 on both XP and Wind
Valentin Villenave wrote Saturday, October 10, 2009 9:59 PM
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
I installed both Neil's and Graham's 2.13.4 releases under
Windows Vista and
AFAICR the default directory was LilyPond as usual. I certainly
didn't
change anything and they wen
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I installed both Neil's and Graham's 2.13.4 releases under Windows Vista and
> AFAICR the default directory was LilyPond as usual. I certainly didn't
> change anything and they went into a directory named Program Files/LilyPond.
> Have I m
riginal Message -
From: "Valentin Villenave"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: "lilypond-user"
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
Patch appreciated, sin
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Patch appreciated, since we're such OMG stupid idiots to fix stuff
> ourselves.
I'd have sent a patch if I knew where the mao the code is :-)
Oh wait, I just found it. Patch attached.
> ... in fact, rather than "appreciated", let's say "
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
> wrote:
> > Who invented this stupidity? Is there a nonGNU lilypond? Is GIMP installed
> > in GNU_IMP?
> > Why people always have the temptation to break things tha
2009/10/10 Valentin Villenave :
> Actually, I first noticed it with Neil's temporary 2.13.4 mingw build,
> back in July. I can't find any trace of this pretty_name change on
> Jan's Github repo, I assume it's just some temporary whimsical idea
> from either Graham or Neil :-)
Nowt to do with me,
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
wrote:
>> The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and
>> not C:\Program Files\LilyPond...
>
> Who invented this stupidity? Is there a nonGNU lilypond? Is GIMP installed
> in GNU_IMP?
> Why people always have
Have these files moved or something?
The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond
and not C:\Program Files\LilyPond...
Who invented this stupidity? Is there a nonGNU lilypond? Is GIMP
installed in GNU_IMP?
Why people always have the temptation to break things that wo
rt and compile OK under the command line, and files
that used to compile return the same errors.
Have these files moved or something?
The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and not
C:\Program Files\LilyPond...
That explains it. Is there a patch availabl
2009/10/10 Nick Payne :
> Mark Austin wrote:
>>
>> Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for
>> a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to
>> the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool:
>>
>> convert-ly.py --edit "C:\Users\Mark Aust
1 - 100 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
