It clearly shows I think, that there is nothing wrong with the pretty
name "GNU LilyPond" (yes, without the ugly underscore), but the nsis
script should be written to use LilyPond and not the ugly GNU_LilyPond
as installation folder.
Though I very strongly object to having the meaningless, confusing and
ugly GNU in an application name. (At least I won't rename LilyPondTool
to GnuLilyPondTool, or GNULilyPondTool or GNU_LilyPond_Tool).
Bert
Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote:
If everything is based on the existence of a given directory, then all
is clear. I believed that the registry had something to do.
No, it only checks for the dir:
http://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/master/nsis/lilypond.nsi#L79
Actually I don't think uninstall
removes anything from the registry anyway (but I
haven't tested this and I may be wrong).
Yes it does:
http://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/master/nsis/lilypond.nsi#L224
:-)
Cheers,
Valentin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
