2008/8/11 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks, I applied all your suggestions.
Thank you, Graham, I've been very disconnected and missed this.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-
Thanks, I applied all your suggestions.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:40:16 +0100
Daniel Hulme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking over NR 1.5.2, I see what appears to be a typo in the fifth
> paragraph of the 'Single-staff polyphony' page.
>
> "The method exposed creates two new vo
Looking over NR 1.5.2, I see what appears to be a typo in the fifth
paragraph of the 'Single-staff polyphony' page.
"The method exposed creates two new voices when the <<{...} \\ {...}>>
construction is found in the code; to temporally add only one additional
voice to an existing one, it is necess
