Hello Jan! I'm just testing out EE and I've come across the need to adress a
noteHead tweak in a note inside a chord. Looking for a solution, I came to
this post. Is this implemented?
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
__
Thank you Thomas, that's very helpful!
2018-02-03 12:10 GMT-03:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2018-02-03 15:44 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro :
> > Hi Thomas, thank you for your corrections!
> >
> > If I may ask, where are functions like event-chord-pitches documented?
>
> A lot of definitions in .scm-files ar
2018-02-03 15:44 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro :
> Hi Thomas, thank you for your corrections!
>
> If I may ask, where are functions like event-chord-pitches documented?
A lot of definitions in .scm-files are not documented.
You may try the code attached to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-u
Hi Thomas, thank you for your corrections!
If I may ask, where are functions like event-chord-pitches documented? I
have only found a list of functions with their name starting with "ly:". I
assumed those were named that way to differentiate Lilypond exclusive
functions from Scheme's own, but it i
2018-02-03 3:52 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro :
> After a lot of stumbling around I finally managed to expand Jan-Peters'
> function so that it can modify more than one note in a given chord. I
> attached it so its available for anyone interested in using it.
Hi Stefano,
I had a look at the functio
Thank you for your help everyone!
After a lot of stumbling around I finally managed to expand Jan-Peters'
function so that it can modify more than one note in a given chord. I
attached it so its available for anyone interested in using it.
On the other hand, I too think that the real solution wou
Hi David (et al.),
> I think it would make a whole lot more sense to teach the Edition
> Engraver how to mark/identify and tweak single items.
+1
At the risk of opening a serious can-o'-worms… I would love for you (David K.)
— who has the best Lilypond-fundamentals programming mind I know — to
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Hello Harm, Stéfano,
>
> I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ...
> Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit
> the accidental. This one can be used with the EE.
> It smells a bit hacky, but it seems to work and
Am 02.02.2018 um 17:55 schrieb David Kastrup:
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
Hello Harm, Stéfano,
I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ...
Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit
the accidental. This one can be used with the EE.
It smells
Hello Harm, Stéfano,
I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ...
Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit
the accidental. This one can be used with the EE.
It smells a bit hacky, but it seems to work and is extendable for other
use cases.
Hello Harm, Stéfano,
I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ...
Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit
the accidental. This one can be used with the EE.
It smells a bit hacky, but it seems to work and is extendable for other
use cases.
Hello Harm, Stéfano,
I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ...
Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit
the accidental. This one can be used with the EE.
It smells a bit hacky, but it seems to work and is extendable for other
use cases.
I'm not sure if EE supports ApplyOutputEvents, but you could try something like
this:
⋘
\applyOutput Voice.Accidental
#(let ((n 1))
(lambda (grob ctx1 ctx2)
(if (= n 0)
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'stencil #f))
(set! n (1- n
% Will omit the N-th ac
2018-02-02 3:55 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro :
> @Thomas
> I was not aware that it was possible to write a function inside of a
> parameter of a grob, and that before-line-breaking and after-line-breaking
> served this purpose. The documentation describes them as booleans and "dummy
> properties" so
@Jan-Peter
>
> *this is a feature I long to implement for quite some time. This means it
> is not possible with the EE right now. The following ideas came up to
> provide a solution: 1. add IDs to certain elements and allow addressing
> elements b ID. 2. Add tweaks with a predicate, e.g. at moment
2018-02-01 16:59 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro :
> Ideally, I wanted a function
> that I could use with the edition-engraver to tweak target elements inside
> chords. I framed the question around accidentals in the post above, but
> ultimately I hoped to be able to use the same function (or a very si
Stefano Troncaro writes:
>> *But you also can use stuff like \once \accidentalStyle forget I think to
>> similar effect.*
>>
>
> Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, if you read my reply to
> Caarg98 you'll notice that I'm looking for something more flexible. That
> is, unless one could
Hello Stéfano,
this is a feature I long to implement for quite some time. This means it
is not possible with the EE right now.
The following ideas came up to provide a solution: 1. add IDs to certain
elements and allow addressing elements b ID. 2. Add tweaks with a
predicate, e.g. at moment x,
@Caagr98
>
>
> *If you could be a bit more specific about your goal (hiding all sharps?
> Hiding accidentals on even-indexed notes? Hiding accidentals specifically
> on cis?), that would make it possible to make a more specific function for
> your goals. (Note that this function can only be used i
Stefano Troncaro writes:
> Hello again everyone!
>
> Suppose I have the following example:
>
> \version "2.19.80"\language "english"
> command = {
> %What should go here to omit the sharp while keeping the natural?}
> \score {
> \new Staff {
> \new Voice \relative c'' {
> \key b \mi
In that case, you could use something like this:
⋘
\version "2.19.80"
nth =
#(define-music-function
(n tweak mus) (integer? ly:music? ly:music?)
(single tweak (list-ref (ly:music-property mus 'elements) n))
mus)
{
\nth 1 \omit Accidental % Remember, zero-indexed
}
⋙
If you could be
I just tried it, but unfortunately it appears to only work when used inside
the chord, and I need to find a way to do it from outside.
2018-01-31 17:39 GMT-03:00 Caagr98 :
> You could try \single instead of \once, as in cs,>.
>
> On 01/31/18 21:27, Stefano Troncaro wrote:
> > Hello again everyon
You could try \single instead of \once, as in .
On 01/31/18 21:27, Stefano Troncaro wrote:
> Hello again everyone!
>
> Suppose I have the following example:
>
> \version "2.19.80" \language "english" command = { %What should go here to
> omit the sharp while keeping the natural? } \score { \new
Hello again everyone!
Suppose I have the following example:
\version "2.19.80"\language "english"
command = {
%What should go here to omit the sharp while keeping the natural?}
\score {
\new Staff {
\new Voice \relative c'' {
\key b \minor \accidentalStyle modern
\partial 4 |
Urs Liska writes:
>> Christ van Willegen schrieb:
[Amadeus]
>>>And if you'd life to get an F-natural in the key of D major, how would
>>>you write that?
>
> I'll look that up, I have got the manual.
My guess would be something like fn or its equivalent according to
Amadeus' input conventions
Hi Brian,
Since you are [ostensibly] sitting on the fence… ;)
This is my “+1” for the cut-and-pastability (and, by extension,
variable-referencibility, etc.) of Lily-code as noted by David K.
Having engraved hundreds of Lilypond scores in the past 11 years — many with
dozens of movements, 50+ s
At 15:41 19/04/2014 +0200, Christ van Willegen wrote:
And if you'd life to get an F-natural in the key of D major, how
would you write that?
Clearly, following normal musical notation, you'd annotate the F in
some way as being not the expected F in D major (F#) - using
something such as fn.
I'll look that up, I have got the manual.
Christ van Willegen schrieb am 19.04.2014:
>On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Actually I'm currently in a discussion with a (highly) professional
>engraver
>> using Amadeus (a Unix/Linux program that has been out of development
>for 15
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Actually I'm currently in a discussion with a (highly) professional engraver
> using Amadeus (a Unix/Linux program that has been out of development for 15
> years now but is still used by a number of professionals). Amadeus is a
> text-compiling
Urs Liska writes:
> I find that very annoying, but he insists that it is in no way
> ambiguous (because you always _see_ the score fragment you're working
> on and the editor also always shows you the effective key). And he
> insists that it is much more efficient simply because he has to type
>
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Certain-accidentals-tp161597p161637.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mai
is is a bit of a pet peeve of
mine.)
HTH,
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Certain-accidentals-tp161597p161633.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
At 15:48 18/04/2014 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 18.04.2014 15:38, schrieb Brian Barker:
No - certainly not (though I know people who do!). You are quite
right not to believe I could be that foolish. But there is still a
difference in the representations: in musical notation, a note on
the F l
At 08:58 18/04/2014 -0500, David Nalesnik wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Brian Barker wrote:
By the way, if you get to have a thousand times as many votes as I
do, I'll make a note not to bother competing with you in any future
dispute. ;^)
Not sure how to take that, but I certainly
Hi Brian,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Brian Barker wrote:
> At 07:57 18/04/2014 -0500, David Nalesnik wrote:
>
>> In my experience, speaking that sort of thing--calling F-sharp "F" ...
>>
>
> Sorry, but who made that suggestion, please? This was about notation, not
> description!
>
But Li
Am 18.04.2014 15:38, schrieb Brian Barker:
At 14:41 18/04/2014 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-04-18 8:26 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker:
But perhaps you are referring to the method of textual input in
Lilypond, where notes that are named "sharp" or "flat" need to be
qualified as such, notwithstanding
At 07:57 18/04/2014 -0500, David Nalesnik wrote:
In my experience, speaking that sort of thing--calling F-sharp "F" ...
Sorry, but who made that suggestion, please? This was about
notation, not description!
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
... I don't want it differen
At 14:41 18/04/2014 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-04-18 8:26 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker:
But perhaps you are referring to the method of textual input in
Lilypond, where notes that are named "sharp" or "flat" need to be
qualified as such, notwithstanding what the \key indication would
appear alr
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> 2014-04-18 8:26 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker :
>
> > But perhaps you are referring to the method of textual input in Lilypond,
> > where notes that are named "sharp" or "flat" need to be qualified as
> such,
> > notwithstanding w
Hi Brian,
2014-04-18 8:26 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker :
> But perhaps you are referring to the method of textual input in Lilypond,
> where notes that are named "sharp" or "flat" need to be qualified as such,
> notwithstanding what the \key indication would appear already to imply. (In
> this way, Li
"a.l.f.r.e.d.o" writes:
> Hi, everybody.
> I sometimes have to write many accidentals in a bar and was wondering
> if there was a way I could write the music in C major and then
> transpose only the notes I need to be "sharpened" or flattened.
Sure. You just need to mark the notes you need to
At 23:09 17/04/2014 -0300, Alfredo Noname wrote:
I sometimes have to write many accidentals in a bar and was
wondering if there was a way I could write the music in C major and
then transpose only the notes I need to be "sharpened" or flattened.
I'm not sure exactly what you mean here. Accide
I think, if you don't specify a key at all, the music will always be "in C" (no
accidentals at the staff's beginning). Of course the notes have all necessary
accidentals.
Best, Robert
> On 18 Apr 2014, at 04:09, "a.l.f.r.e.d.o" wrote:
>
> Hi, everybody.
> I sometimes have to write many acc
Hi, everybody.
I sometimes have to write many accidentals in a bar and was wondering if there
was a way I could write the music in C major and then transpose only the notes
I need to be "sharpened" or flattened. ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-
44 matches
Mail list logo
