Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > I find that very annoying, but he insists that it is in no way > ambiguous (because you always _see_ the score fragment you're working > on and the editor also always shows you the effective key). And he > insists that it is much more efficient simply because he has to type > less.
It's rather error-prone since it means that you cannot ever use copy-and-paste for any piece of music since its meaning will change depending on where you copy it. I assume that you are _not_ typing what gets typeset but instead a version relative to the current key in effect. If you are _indeed_ typing what gets typeset, the meaning of a phrase would change even when just repeating it displaced by non-whole measures. Irrespective of that, you cannot copy into a different key, or move a key change across some passage to make it scan better. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
