Hi Folks,
There's a new version of the `articulate' script available at
http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
Changes are:
-- fix bad synchronisation after breathing, explicit line
break and fingering events
-- add staccatissimo
-- fix duration of tri
On 3 Jun 2009, at 00:16, Peter Chubb wrote:
Hans> (Isn't there a timing problem at the second triplet?)
There is --- it's to do the gruppetto at the end of the trill, that
seems to interfere with the first note of the triplet in the MIDI
output. It's not something I can fix with articulate.
> "hhpmusic" == hhpmusic writes:
>> And I've now fixed the permissions on the download link there.
>> Sorry for the bother before.
hhpmusic> Thank you very much, but I still can't access the "here"
hhpmusic> link. The web can't find the page, even though I
hhpmusic> registered. How to get
> "Hans" == Hans Aberg writes:
Hans> On 2 Jun 2009, at 01:29, Peter Chubb wrote:
>> I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI
>> output from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme
>> code used, at http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
Hans> (Isn't
On 2 Jun 2009, at 01:29, Peter Chubb wrote:
I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI output
from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme code used,
at
http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
(Isn't there a timing problem at the second triplet?)
Dear Peter:
> And I've now fixed the permissions on the download link there. Sorry for the
> bother before.
Thank you very much, but I still can't access the "here" link. The web can't
find the page, even though I registered. How to get the file?
Haipeng
> "Peter" == Peter Chubb writes:
Peter> Hi,
Peter> I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI
Peter> output from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme
Peter> code used, at http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
And I've now fixed the permissions
On 6/1/09 5:29 PM, "Peter Chubb" wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI output
> from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme code used, at
> http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
Peter,
I haven't had a chance to loo
Hi,
I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI output
from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme code used, at
http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
It has before-and-after MIDI samples to listen to, and a full
description of what the script
Peter Chubb wrote Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:37 PM
Trevor> Hi Peter
Trevor> Just tried your articulate.ly. Looks really promising! A
Trevor> couple of early comments. It may be obvious, but \articulate
Trevor> should only be used in a \score block with just \midi {} - it
Trevor> mucks up th
> "Trevor" == Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Trevor> Hi Peter
Trevor> Just tried your articulate.ly. Looks really promising! A
Trevor> couple of early comments. It may be obvious, but \articulate
Trevor> should only be used in a \score block with just \midi {} - it
Trevor> muck
n Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Diana Nguyen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dorothy Kennedy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 4:38 AM
Subject: Better Midi!
Hi Folks,
I now have permission to release the articulat
Hi Folks,
I now have permission to release the articulation code
to improve MIDI output for lilypond. I've attached it as a
tar.bz2 file here. The code is copyright 2008 NICTA (my employer),
but released under GPL version 2.
The simple way to use it is to use the
Hi folks,
Thanks to Lilypond and a lot of work from the team here, the
UNSW/NICTA robot clarinet won first prize in the Artemis Orchestra
competition.
See
http://www.nicta.com.au/research/research_themes2/embedded_systems/artemis
for details.
The `articulate' script that adds phrasing a
Am 2008-03-11 um 03:10 schrieb Graham Percival:
Well, I thought the original poster was offering to improve
lilypond's midi export. So this _would_ work on any lilypond
file... after a certain version number. :)
Besides robotics I'm very much interested in enhanced MIDI output,
but can't d
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
The artemis orchestra competition has specified Lilypond as
its input format
since the subject of "better midi" on lilypond has surfaced, i'd like
to take the opportunity to express a wish|request|suggestion that,
being a newbie, ne
El Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:30:07 +1100
Peter Chubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> The artemis orchestra competition has specified Lilypond as
> its input format
since the subject of "better midi" on lilypond has surfaced, i'd like
to take the opportunity to express a w
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:08:05 +1100
Peter Chubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Graham" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Graham> The above points are possibly with a macro: instead of simply
> Graham> moltorit = \markup{ \italics molto rit }
>
> The point is that for the
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:07:17 +0100
Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival skrev:
> > moltorit = ... scheme that prints out "molto rit", and tweaks
> > whatever options you want for your new midi code...
>
> That won't work.
> If I read the rules of the artemis context correctly
> "Graham" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Graham> The above points are possibly with a macro: instead of simply
Graham> moltorit = \markup{ \italics molto rit }
The point is that for the Artemis competition we have to start with
unmodified Lilypond input. So we have to recog
Graham Percival skrev:
moltorit = ... scheme that prints out "molto rit", and tweaks
whatever options you want for your new midi code...
That won't work.
If I read the rules of the artemis context correctly, the solution must
work for any lilypond file.
I assume that the organizers are using
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:30:07 +1100
Peter Chubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before I start working on any of this, is anyone else doing anything
> in the area? Most of it may be doable by scheme scripts inserted into
> the source file before calling Lilypond.
No, nobody is working on MIDI output
Hi folks,
The artemis orchestra competition has specified Lilypond as
its input format (see
https://www.artemisia-association.org/artemis_orchestra ) for robotic
instruments. We're trying to put together an entry (our robotic
violinist was entered last year, with some success;
(http://ww
On Thursday 03 February 2005 07:51 am, Christ van Willegen wrote:
> Hi list, Han-Wen,
>
> > with natural sounding performance, then you're welcome to chip in
> > and
> >
> > Donate money
> >
> > to support this effort.
>
> I'll chip in, and let you know in a private mail how much...
>
> I have
Hi list, Han-Wen,
> with natural sounding performance, then you're welcome to chip in and
>
> Donate money
>
> to support this effort.
I'll chip in, and let you know in a private mail how much...
I have type-set scores for my choir with Lilypond, using the Midi output to
generate CDs and
here is some
interest in better MIDI output.
Getting the MIDI backend to quality level of the notation backend is a
task I'd happily pursue, if sufficient funds are raised. I already
have a pledge for EUR 750, but that is not enough. My rough estimate
is that I could do it for EUR 3500.
26 matches
Mail list logo
