Re: Auto-beaming

Hi, > > I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing > > four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should > > use Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? > > I was wonderning if in the end you found a solution. I would like to > do

Re: Auto-beaming

Hi, > I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing > four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should use > Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? I was wonderning if in the end you found a solution. I would like to do the same a

RE: Why is there no auto beaming in temporary polyphony?

Carl, Welcome, any time! Mark -Original Message- From: Carl Sorensen [mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 7:37 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek ; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Why is there no auto beaming in temporary polyphony? On 4/10/18, 8:10 PM, "Mark St

Re: Why is there no auto beaming in temporary polyphony?

On 4/10/18, 8:10 PM, "Mark Stephen Mrotek" wrote: I have no explanation, just a solution \version "2.19" \new Staff = "right"{ \clef treble <<{e''8 f'' s4} \\ {a'4 b'4} >> c'' b' | \voiceOne e''8 f'' b'4 c'' b' } Mark O

RE: Why is there no auto beaming in temporary polyphony?

x27; b' } Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Carl Sorensen Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 6:46 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Why is there no auto beaming in temporary polyphony? < I&

Why is there no auto beaming in temporary polyphony?

< I'm not top posting When I use temporary polyphony with the double backslash construct, autobeaming is not working for me. %%% \version "2.19" \new Staff = "right"{ \clef treble <<{e''8 f''} \\ {a'4} >> b'4 c'' b' | \voiceOne e''8 f'' b'4 c'' b' } %% I thought that th

Re: Auto-beaming

That gives exactly the same output as the baseMoment version. On 12/15/17 04:26, Vaughan McAlley wrote: > On 15 December 2017 at 12:58, Caagr98 > wrote: > > I tried that at first, but it made *everything* beam together, including > rest+three eights or stuff contai

Re: Auto-beaming

On 15 December 2017 at 12:58, Caagr98 wrote: > I tried that at first, but it made *everything* beam together, including > rest+three eights or stuff containing sixteenths. > > On 12/15/17 02:54, Ben wrote: > > On 12/14/2017 8:21 PM, Caagr98 wrote: > >> I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/

Re: Auto-beaming

I tried that at first, but it made *everything* beam together, including rest+three eights or stuff containing sixteenths. On 12/15/17 02:54, Ben wrote: > On 12/14/2017 8:21 PM, Caagr98 wrote: >> I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing >> four eights to be all

Re: Auto-beaming

On 12/14/2017 8:21 PM, Caagr98 wrote: I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should use Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? ___ lilyp

Re: Auto-beaming

On 12/14/2017 8:21 PM, Caagr98 wrote: I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should use Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? ___ lilyp

Auto-beaming

I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should use Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.

Re: Help with Auto-beaming rules

ere beamed in larger groups. > > Of course. > > > Can this be done by auto-beaming rules in LilyPond? > > My attempt follows - I have created two bars beamed manually and > > followed with two bars which I hope to auto-beam by feeding the first > > two bars to \beamE

Re: Help with Auto-beaming rules

med >> group and a series of 32[ 32 32 32] beamed groups in a 2/4 time >> signature. This is quite typical of the period and is IMHO more legible >> than if the 1/32 notes were beamed in larger groups. >> > > Of course. > > Can this be done by auto-beaming ru

Re: Help with Auto-beaming rules

were beamed in larger groups. Of course. Can this be done by auto-beaming rules in LilyPond? My attempt follows - I have created two bars beamed manually and followed with two bars which I hope to auto-beam by feeding the first two bars to \beamExceptions. 8>< 8>< 8>< 8>&l

Help with Auto-beaming rules

The attached bit of 18th century typesetting shows an 8.[ 32 32] beamed group and a series of 32[ 32 32 32] beamed groups in a 2/4 time signature. This is quite typical of the period and is IMHO more legible than if the 1/32 notes were beamed in larger groups. Can this be done by auto-beaming

Re: Force auto-beaming?

ays to the auto- beaming gremlin, "Force this, even under \cadenzaOn with some barlines crammed in -- ALWAYS -- period!" So that a beam will break _only_ for a non-beamable note or for a rest. Thanks, Pete ___ lilypond-user mailing list l

Re: Force auto-beaming?

Hi Peter, how about a tiny example ? Cheers, Pierre ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Force auto-beaming?

##t") only writes flags. Is there an override to force auto-beaming? Thanks in advance. Pete ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: auto-beaming problem

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > On 1/18/12 8:19 AM, "Ralph Palmer" wrote: > > >Greetings - > > > >I'm running LilyPond 2.12 under Windows XP. > > > >\version "2.14.1" > > Your version says 2.14. 2.14 has different syntax. > > There is a snippet in the docs for 2.14

Re: auto-beaming problem

I've tried >\set Timing.baseMoment >and >override-auto-beam-setting >as in the following snippet. If anyone can point out my error, please do. > >%% Start Snippet % > >% auto-beaming test >\version "2.14.1" Your version says 2.14. 2.14 has differe

Re: auto-beaming problem

- Original Message - From: "James" To: "Ralph Palmer" Cc: "lilypond-user Mailinglist" Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:46 PM Subject: Re: auto-beaming problem Ralph, On 18 January 2012 15:19, Ralph Palmer wrote: Greetings - I'm running Lil

Re: auto-beaming problem

Ralph, On 18 January 2012 15:19, Ralph Palmer wrote: > Greetings - > > I'm running LilyPond 2.12 under Windows XP. 2.12? Your example is using a \version 2.14. Is there a typo in your email? James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

auto-beaming problem

one can point out my error, please do. %% Start Snippet % % auto-beaming test \version "2.14.1" A = \relative c' { \clef treble \key c \major \time 3/4 c8 c c c c c | c16 c c c c c c c c c c c | \set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) c8 c c

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

Rutger Hofman cs.vu.nl> writes: > > Hello list, > > the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8 > time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th extends > to the wrong side. See attached .png and its .ly source. > > Can yo

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

On 29 December 2011 16:23, Graham Percival wrote: > > Yes. Thank you Graham for this raisoned and well-arhued answer. Rutger, have a look at what 2 lead developers have recently said about using development version: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00503.html http://lis

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

Graham Percival writes: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:18:04PM +0100, Rutger Hofman wrote: >> >This is fixed in the latest development version. >> >> Is it strongly disadvised to upgrade to that for 'stable' usage? > > Yes. The current version is an improvement in a number of ways, but you are, f

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:18:04PM +0100, Rutger Hofman wrote: > >This is fixed in the latest development version. > > Is it strongly disadvised to upgrade to that for 'stable' usage? Yes. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

On 12/29/2011 03:18 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: "Rutger Hofman" To: Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:12 PM Subject: Auto-beaming in tuplets? Hello list, the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8 time, but if it is withi

Re: Auto-beaming in tuplets?

- Original Message - From: "Rutger Hofman" To: Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:12 PM Subject: Auto-beaming in tuplets? Hello list, the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8 time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th e

Auto-beaming in tuplets?

Hello list, the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8 time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th extends to the wrong side. See attached .png and its .ly source. Can you please point me how I can fix this, e.g. with an autobeaming rule

Re: auto-beaming

M Watts wrote Saturday, March 21, 2009 6:57 AM Mats Bengtsson wrote: Trevor Daniels wrote: Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn subdivideBeams on and off as required. Should we turn this into feature r

Re: auto-beaming

Mats Bengtsson wrote: Trevor Daniels wrote: Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn subdivideBeams on and off as required. Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic subdivision of beams

Re: auto-beaming

In message , Trevor Daniels writes BTW, did we ever file a feature request for a function to revert all the beam-ending rules in a particular time signature? This would also be very useful. It would be ... especially when the rules are buggy :-) I think it's been fixed (so I need to upgrade)

Re: auto-beaming

Carl D. Sorensen wrote Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:01 PM On 3/19/09 11:56 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote: BTW, did we ever file a feature request for a function to revert all the beam-ending rules in a particular time signature? This would also be very useful. I don't think we ever filed a feat

Re: auto-beaming

On 3/19/09 11:56 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote: >>> You mean, using >>> #(override-auto-beam-setting '(subdivide 1 32 3 4) 1 8) >>> to get a subdivision after the first four 32nd notes in 3/4 >>> meter? Good >>> idea! >> >> Actually, that's not what I meant. But it's what I should have >> meant

Re: auto-beaming

Carl D. Sorensenwrote Thursday, March 19, 2009 2:42 PM On 3/19/09 8:34 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: Carl D. Sorensen wrote: On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic subdivision of beams even more flexible, with separate

Re: auto-beaming

On 3/19/09 8:34 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: > Carl D. Sorensen wrote: >> >> On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: >> >> >> >>> Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic >>> subdivision of beams even more flexible, with separate rules for >>> different note lengt

Re: auto-beaming

Carl D. Sorensen wrote: On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic subdivision of beams even more flexible, with separate rules for different note lengths, or would the resulting scheme get too messy to use and implement?

Re: auto-beaming

On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: > Trevor Daniels wrote: >> Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what >> I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn >> subdivideBeams on and off as required. > Should we turn this into feature request to make

Re: auto-beaming

Trevor Daniels wrote: Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn subdivideBeams on and off as required. Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic subdivision of beams even more flexible, wit

Re: auto-beaming

videBeams on and off as required. Note that this will change in 2.13 - the revert commands will not be necessary as these beam-ending rules have been removed. HTH Trevor - Original Message - From: "David Bobroff" To: Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:17 AM Subject: a

auto-beaming

I'm trying to work out some auto-beaming modifications. In 2/4 time I want: 4 8th notes beamed 4 16th notes beamed 8 32nd notes beamed with a subdivision at the 8th note level Is this possible? I understand that I'll need to revert some beaming rules in auto-beam.scm. Frankly, I

Re: Auto beaming

Hi, No, Trevor's solution was the one I needed. I wanted pairs of 8ths beamed together, not everything beamed together. Thanks though! Ben On Tuesday, March 17, 2009, at 02:49AM, "Craig Bakalian" wrote: >Hi, > I don't know if you want to do this, but can't you simply use the >beaming

Re: Auto beaming in unmetered music

= ##f > \time 1/4 > \key g \major > \cadenzaOn > > c8 fis c a c e \bar "|" >... > >Trevor > >- Original Message - >From: "Trevor Daniels" >To: "Benedict Singer" ; >Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:22 AM >Subject: Re

Re: Auto beaming

Hi, I don't know if you want to do this, but can't you simply use the beaming syntax [ ] to handle your requirements. Like c8 [ fis c a c e \bar "|" c8 fis c a c e c d c b \bar "|" c8 d c b c g \bar "|" c8 d c b c g c fis, c' c' \bar "|" c,8 c, c' c'

Re: Auto beaming in unmetered music

"|" ... Trevor - Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" To: "Benedict Singer" ; Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:22 AM Subject: Re: Auto beaming in unmetered music Hi The easiest way to do this is to set measureLength and beatLength explicitly (as you've be

Re: Auto beaming in unmetered music

g \major \cadenzaOn \set Score.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) \set Score.beatLength = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) c8 fis c a c e \bar "|" ... Trevor - Original Message - From: "Benedict Singer" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:15 AM Subject: Auto beaming in unme

Auto beaming in unmetered music

Hi all, I'm writing some un-metered music, using \cadenzaOn and putting in \bar "|" where I want barlines. However, the music is a lot of 8th and 16th notes, and I'd like them beamed into quarter note groups at all times, i.e. 2 consecutive 8ths beam together, and 4 consecutive 16ths beam

Re: incorrect auto bar and auto beaming ?

could it be that the bar counting is not fully correct - try to make some bar checks - best is after each measure! hdh -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/incorrect-auto-bar-and-auto-beaming---tp21764013p21764803.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive

incorrect auto bar and auto beaming ?

hello, i have a score which specifies: \time 4/4 {tomfl16-> toml16 tomml16 tommh16 tomh4.:32\laissezVibrer r8 tomfl16 toml8:16 tomml16 tomh16 tommh8 tomfl16 toml8 tommh8 tomml16 tomh16 r4 tomfl16-> toml16 tommh16 tomh16 tomml4.:32\laissezVibrer r8 tomfl16 toml8:16 tomh16 tomml16 tommh8 tomfl

Auto-beaming rules

I'm making some changes to the auto-beaming rules to take full advantage of beatGrouping wherever possible, since this will make the default beaming much easier to override. I'd like to be sure LilyPond follows standard beaming practice (in so far as it is defined) wrt beat grouping

auto-beaming in uncommon time signatures

Howdy! I'm experiencing some unusual behavior with beaming that I can't seem to correct.In 12/16 time, if the Score.beatlength is set to 6/16, lilypond correctly produces two groupings of 6 notes each. However, changing the beatLength to 3/16 produces inconsistent beaming within a measure: 2-

Re: auto beaming strangeness

Hi Adam, On 6/30/07, Adam Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 9 8) 6 8) You don't need this line - it doesn't do anything, since there's no default auto-beam setting for this. Also, your new values are needlessly complicated - you were almost right the firs

Re: auto beaming strangeness

Thanks Neil. I should have paid more attention to the manual when learning this...here's the fix I was looking for: %%% \time 9/8 %%% revert default values in scm/auto-beam.scm regarding 9/8 time 3+3 +3+2 #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 9 8) 3 8) #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 9

Re: auto beaming strangeness

Hi Adam, Your revert doesn't work because it doesn't match the default for 9/8. If you check the auto-beam engraver settings in auto-beam.scm you'll see the following line: ((end * * 9 8) . ,(ly:make-moment 3 8)) So you need to change your revert to the following: #(revert-auto-beam-setting '

Re: auto beaming strangeness

On Jun 29, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Bainos wrote: by default there is a division at 3/8.. try using revert-auto-beam.. I did try that actually...am I doing something wrong here? % \version "2.11.17-1" \relative a' { \time 9/8 #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 3 8) #(override-auto-b

Re: auto beaming strangeness

by default there is a division at 3/8.. try using revert-auto-beam.. look here http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Setting-automatic-beam-behavior#Setting-automatic-beam-behavior -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/auto-beaming-strangeness

auto beaming strangeness

Hi I'm using Dev version 2.11.27-1 I would expect the following example with 9/8 time sig to be grouped and auto beamed in 2+2+2+3 % \version "2.11.17-1" \relative a' { \time 9/8 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 2 8) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 4 8) #(over

Re: Compound time auto-beaming problem

Wow.  I'm going to have to parse that syntax to see what it's doing.  I think that using that method to beam will be less effort than just manually beaming.Thanks for all the advice, I really appreciate it. ~MattOn 9/12/06, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Neeman wrote:>> I think Mats

Re: Compound time auto-beaming problem

Joe Neeman wrote: I think Mats may have misunderstood what you wanted. You want the following beaming, yes? a8[ r16 r8 a16] a8[ r16 r8 a16] If so, I don't think the automatic-beaming can help you; I don't think there is a way to tell it to ignore rests while making up beams. Thanks for th

Re: Compound time auto-beaming problem

> measure, each 16th note should be beamed to the previous 8th note. > Since these patterns occur frequently, how do I configure auto-beaming > to do this, instead of manually beaming with [ ] ? > > Thanks in advance for your help! > ~Matt > > { > \time 12/16 > #(ove

Re: Compound time auto-beaming problem

Matt Huber wrote: The first bar has the beams broken correctly (two groups of six). The second bar is notes 1 and 6 of each group. Exactly, and in the first bar, you get a new beam on the second beat, i.e. before the 7th 16th-note. The same thing happens in the second bar if you count correc

Re: Compound time auto-beaming problem

lyPond. Also, since you want to breakbeams at the beat in the first bar, I don't see any way to configure the auto-beaming to do what you want.   /MatsMatt Huber wrote:> Hello all~>> I am attempting to write some music in 12/16 time.  I would like the> beaming to be in groups of six.  

Re: Compound time auto-beaming problem

Are you really sure that you want beams across the beats in the second measure? As a player, I would find that much more confusing than the layout you get now from LilyPond. Also, since you want to break beams at the beat in the first bar, I don't see any way to configure the auto-beaming

Compound time auto-beaming problem

patterns occur frequently, how do I configure auto-beaming to do this, instead of manually beaming with [ ] ? Thanks in advance for your help!~Matt{\time 12/16#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 12 16) 6 16 )\set Score.beatLength = #(ly:make-moment 6 16)a8 a16 a8 a16 a8 a16 a8 a16 |a8 r16 r8 a

Re: Auto beaming question

tting '(end 1 32 * *) 2 4) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 * *) 3 4) The sixteenth note triplets are beamed correctly, but the groups with thirty-second notes are beamed incorrectly. Can anyone tell me which auto-beaming commands to use? Thanks! [...] So in order to ge

Re: Auto beaming question

end 1 32 * *) 3 4) The sixteenth note triplets are beamed correctly, but the groups with thirty-second notes are beamed incorrectly. Can anyone tell me which auto-beaming commands to use? Thanks! The problem is that the default auto-beaming (as defined in scm/auto-beam.scm) has the fol

Auto beaming question

Hello all, I'm trying to typeset a piece (it's the Allemanda from Bach's second violin partita, BWV 1004, in case you care). I'm having a little bit of trouble configuring the auto beaming to do exactly what I want. There are basically three rhythmic units present

Re: auto-beaming question

Joe Neeman wrote: The reason is because of these 2 lines in /usr/share/lilypond/2.6.X/scm/auto-beam.scm (or whereever you have installed lilypond): ((end 1 32 2 4) . ,(ly:make-moment 1 8)) ((end 1 32 2 4) . ,(ly:make-moment 3 8)) That is, lilypond has a built-in beam setting that breaks a

Re: auto-beaming question

\version "2.6.3" \score { \new Staff { \relative c'{ \key g \major \clef violin \time 2/4 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4 ) c16. c32 c8 c4 %Bar 1 c8 c16. c32 c4 %Bar 2 }}} The result can be seen here: http://pocentek.perso.cegetel.net/test-overri

Re: auto-beaming question

Graham Percival wrote: If you haven't already, try reading section 8.6.2 from the documentation for 2.7. The docs have been (hopefully) clarified, and it will all apply to 2.6 as well. Done. The documentation seems clear to me, but there's something I don't understand. Here is a short exam

Re: auto-beaming question

On 22-Aug-05, at 12:31 PM, Gauvain Pocentek wrote: es16.[ es32 d16. c32] and I'd like beaming to be automatically set as in the above exemple, without using []. I've tried many things like: #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4 ) If you haven't already, try reading section

auto-beaming question

Hello, I'm typesetting a piece with a lot of rhythms like: es16.[ es32 d16. c32] and I'd like beaming to be automatically set as in the above exemple, without using []. I've tried many things like: #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4 ) or \set beatLength = #(ly:make-mo

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 15 Aug 2005, at 01:41, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Apparently one just adds a few more "override-auto-beam-setting": \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 2 16) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) Sorry for bothering you with so simple matters. Can one

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

Hans Aberg wrote: Apparently one just adds a few more "override-auto-beam-setting": \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 2 16) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) Sorry for bothering you with so simple matters. Can one insert automated dotted bar-lines

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 9 Aug 2005, at 13:42, Mats Bengtsson wrote: The easiest way to automate it is probably to do something like (assuming the piece repeats this pattern 12 times) barlines = { \repeat 12 {s8*7 \bar ":" s8*7 \bar ":" s8*11 | } which you can add in one of your staves (since a \bar statement appl

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

Mats Bengtsson wrote: The easiest way to automate it is probably to do something like (assuming the piece repeats this pattern 12 times) barlines = { \repeat 12 {s8*7 \bar ":" s8*7 \bar ":" s8*11 | } This should of course be barlines = { \repeat unfold 12 {s8*7 \bar ":" s8*7 \bar ":" s8*11 |

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

The easiest way to automate it is probably to do something like (assuming the piece repeats this pattern 12 times) barlines = { \repeat 12 {s8*7 \bar ":" s8*7 \bar ":" s8*11 | } which you can add in one of your staves (since a \bar statement applies to all staves, you can add it anywhere): \sco

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 9 Aug 2005, at 00:50, Graham Percival wrote: Apparently one just adds a few more "override-auto-beam-setting": \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 2 16) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) Sorry for bothering you with so simple matters. Can one insert

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 7-Aug-05, at 10:04 AM, Hans Aberg wrote: Apparently one just adds a few more "override-auto-beam-setting": \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 2 16) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) Sorry for bothering you with so simple matters. Can one insert aut

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 7 Aug 2005, at 14:28, Hans Aberg wrote: The rule seems to only work when decomposing the time signature in two parts. For example 7 = 4 + 3 works fine using \time 7/16 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 7 16) 4 16) But what do I write if I want to use 7 = 2 + 2 + 3 (or 13 = 4 + 4

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 7 Aug 2005, at 04:28, Graham Percival wrote: How do I auto-beam in asymmetrical times signatures? For example, 7/16 may decompose as (2+2+3)/16, (4+3)/16, (3+2+2)/16. You look at doc section 6.4.4 Automatic beams You follow the link to 8.6.2 Setting automatic beam behavior You read that

Re: Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

On 5-Aug-05, at 7:31 AM, Hans Aberg wrote: How do I auto-beam in asymmetrical times signatures? For example, 7/16 may decompose as (2+2+3)/16, (4+3)/16, (3+2+2)/16. You look at doc section 6.4.4 Automatic beams You follow the link to 8.6.2 Setting automatic beam behavior You read that page.

Auto-beaming in asymmetrical time signatures

How do I auto-beam in asymmetrical times signatures? For example, 7/16 may decompose as (2+2+3)/16, (4+3)/16, (3+2+2)/16. Hans Aberg ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user