Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

2018-12-14 Thread David Wright
On Fri 14 Dec 2018 at 17:32:59 (+1100), Andrew Bernard wrote: > I was so disappointed with the complete mess the current abc2ly makes of > Irish tunes from the vast repository at thesession.org that I started > looking into this. The others mentioned that using abc2xml and then using > musixxml2ly

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

2018-12-13 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Laura, I was so disappointed with the complete mess the current abc2ly makes of Irish tunes from the vast repository at thesession.org that I started looking into this. The others mentioned that using abc2xml and then using musixxml2ly supplied with lilypond is the way forward. I found this to

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

2018-12-13 Thread Laura Conrad
> "Andrew" == Andrew Bernard writes: Andrew> I had such poor results with abc2ly just recently that I Andrew> can't imagine there is any user base using it in earnest, or Andrew> even at all, else there would be lots of complaints. Or Andrew> perhaps I was doing something wron

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

2018-12-10 Thread Johan Vromans
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:21:44 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > It sounds reasonable to drop the current abc2ly implementation. However, > I think we shouldn't do this without somehow including abc2xml in the > distribution and (probably) create a wrapper script abc2ly that > transparently replaces the

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

2018-12-10 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Urs, I had such poor results with abc2ly just recently that I can't imagine there is any user base using it in earnest, or even at all, else there would be lots of complaints. Or perhaps I was doing something wrong. I feel that it does not deserve a place in the stable. I think instead of incl

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

2018-12-10 Thread Urs Liska
Am 10.12.18 um 12:18 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Hi Rutger, this is great. But I think you mean this page: https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/abc2xml.html [Took me a while to figure that out.] I conclude it's not worth spending any energy on lilypond abc2ly. Sounds like it should even be dropped, an

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

2018-12-10 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Rutger, this is great. But I think you mean this page: https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/abc2xml.html [Took me a while to figure that out.] I conclude it's not worth spending any energy on lilypond abc2ly. Sounds like it should even be dropped, and perhaps the NR could day how to achieve ABC to

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

2018-12-10 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Rutger Hofman wrote: Isn't it possible (and easy) to use Wim Vree's utility abc2xml, see https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/xml2abc.html to convert to MusicXML and then convert the MusicXML into lilypond? From a maintenance/engineering view, it is much preferable to have one

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

2018-12-10 Thread Rutger Hofman
On 10-12-18 10:40, Andrew Bernard wrote: Hi Johan, Having recently become interested in Irish Traditional Music where there are countless tens of thousands of tunes in ABC, the de facto standard for the tradition, I'd be keen to see abc2ly brought up to date. My tests with it on a sample of s