Am 20.07.2014 11:10, schrieb Janek WarchoĊ:
Hi folks,
as you can see, i'm falling behind with lilypond stuff, but i wanted
to let you know that i've skimmed through this discussion and it LGTM.
The only comment i have is: try to make things as simple as possible
(but not simpler, of course) - i
On 7. Juli 2014 16:48:44 MESZ, Paul Morris wrote:
>Uns Liska wrote
>> Hm, I think I _must not_ start with such a script right now, since I
>> know that this - although being not too complex - will eat up too
>much
>> of my time and concentration.
>>
>> But your message triggered a little bit
Am 07.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Am 07.07.2014 11:46, schrieb Urs Liska:
I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the
right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up
with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated
accord
Am 07.07.2014 11:46, schrieb Urs Liska:
>> I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the
>> right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up
>> with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated
>> according to the path they are stored in.
>
Am 07.07.2014 11:37, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Hi Urs and all,
I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the
right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up
with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated
according to the path they are
Hi Urs and all,
I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the
right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up
with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated
according to the path they are stored in.
Should we have a dedicated folder fo
Uns Liska wrote
> I have updated the Wiki page
> https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/wiki
>
> and added a note about the reorganization process in the README.md on
> the restructuring branch.
It's looking good to me. From the wiki page:
"Probably it's a good idea to assign a primary tag
Am 05.07.2014 10:31, schrieb Urs Liska:
Thanks.
I think we will have to reconsider our metadata section and then do the
transfer in that "reorganization" branch. I strongly suggest to
excusively do that using pull requests, even among the members with push
access.
One more thing I would suggest
