Hi,
Since a python upgrade, Frescobaldi has a serious issue:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/view.py", line 107, in
event
if ev.type() == QEvent.KeyPress:
^^^
TypeError: a member of enum 'StandardKey' is expected not 'QEvent'
then
>> When I attempt to change the "direction" property of a slur,
>> whether that is with \tweak or \override, I cannot set the
>> direction to neutral (0). UP (1) and DOWN (-1) work fine, but when
>> setting to 0, I get the following error:
>>
>> "Assertion failed: d, file
>> /home/lily/lilypond-
> The "R.H." instruction with 45 degree slope down and up from treble
> to bass clef: How?
Look up 'staff-change lines' in the Notation Reference index to get
details on the `\showStaffSwitch` command.
Werner
Have I missed delivery of some posts? I can't see where the OP has
clarified what he means.
Andrew
Thank you so much!
-Ahanu
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, 20:36 Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> On 30/01/2023 02:20, Ahanu Banerjee wrote:
> > When I attempt to change the "direction" property of a slur, whether
> that is with \tweak or \override, I cannot set the direction to neutral
> (0). UP (1) and DOWN (-1
On 30/01/2023 02:20, Ahanu Banerjee wrote:
> When I attempt to change the "direction" property of a slur, whether that is
> with \tweak or \override, I cannot set the direction to neutral (0). UP (1)
> and DOWN (-1) work fine, but when setting to 0, I get the following error:
>
> "Assertion fai
When I attempt to change the "direction" property of a slur, whether that
is with \tweak or \override, I cannot set the direction to neutral (0). UP
(1) and DOWN (-1) work fine, but when setting to 0, I get the following
error:
"Assertion failed: d, file
/home/lily/lilypond-2.24.0/release/binaries
Ahanu Banerjee writes:
> Never mind, it appears that adding "\etc" does what I am trying to do:
>
> makeRed = -\tweak color "red" \etc
Pretty much the primordial use case for \etc .
--
David Kastrup
Never mind, it appears that adding "\etc" does what I am trying to do:
makeRed = -\tweak color "red" \etc
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 5:53 PM Ahanu Banerjee
wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply. I am looking to create a function that can
> apply to more than one type of object, in this instance, slu
Thanks for the quick reply. I am looking to create a function that can
apply to more than one type of object, in this instance, slurs,
articulations, and possibly fingerings. All the examples I have seen
require specifying the object. Is it possible to have a function behave
like "-\tweak" that act
On 29/01/2023 23:45, Ahanu Banerjee wrote:
> How can I define a function that applies one or more tweaks to the object
> that comes after it?
>
> example: I want the following expression to be a function called "\makeRed":
> -\tweak color "red"
>
> so that I can type \makeRed \downbow instead o
How can I define a function that applies one or more tweaks to the object
that comes after it?
example: I want the following expression to be a function called "\makeRed":
-\tweak color "red"
so that I can type \makeRed \downbow instead of -\tweak color "red" \downbow
Thanks,
-Ahanu
Il giorno dom 29 gen 2023 alle 22:20:14 +0100, Stefan E. Mueller
ha scritto:
What I would like to know is whether it is possible to give the tuning
notes right before the first Tabstaff, vertically aligned to the
tablature
lines. I tried accomplish this using "instrumentName", but it does not
Hi Stefan,
The markup command \column uses the property baseline-skip for the minmal
distance between two baselines. You need to reduce this value to the actual
distance between two tab lines, which is by default 1.5 for a TabStaff.
So this will align more or less:
\score
{
<<
\new TabStaff \
Hi,
I am using Lilypond for writing guitar tablature, and sometimes open
or special tunings are used (e.g. DADGAD). I know how to specify the
tuning in Lilypond using \stringTuning , so the tablature
comes out nice and correct.
What I would like to know is whether it is possible to give the tun
On 2023-01-29 18:19, Lukas-Fabian Moser
wrote:
Am 29.01.23 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
Valentin Petzel
writes:
Hello David,
in most cases definitely, but I suppose t
Valentin Petzel writes:
>> The lower voice could not possibly be autobeamed anyway since it starts
>> behind the beat. You need to add all of the skips manually, and I don't
>> think that adding the single beam you want would be enough effort to
>> warrant autobeaming.
>
> Why would this be so?
> The lower voice could not possibly be autobeamed anyway since it starts
> behind the beat. You need to add all of the skips manually, and I don't
> think that adding the single beam you want would be enough effort to
> warrant autobeaming.
Why would this be so? Lilypond does not have issues aut
On 29/01/2023 18:03, Christian wrote:
As a trombone player myself: yes, bass clef in anything else than
concert pitch is weird... to us. But it's pretty common with bass
clarinet (bass clef in b/flat or in a) and low horn parts (bass clef in f).
Bass clef in F? Just pull the trigger and keep i
On 29/01/2023 17:46, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Bass clef for bass clarinet is not mentioned in Strauss-Berlioz (Study
of instrumentation), but e.g. Rachmaninoff uses it routinely (2nd
symphony, Symphonic Dances, Isle of the Dead). I'm certain Werner will
be able to provide more details 😄.
Bas
As a trombone player myself: yes, bass clef in anything else than concert
pitch is weird... to us. But it's pretty common with bass clarinet (bass
clef in b/flat or in a) and low horn parts (bass clef in f).
Best regards,
Christian
Wol schrieb am So., 29. Jän. 2023, 18:21:
> On 29/01/2023 10:03
Am 29.01.23 um 18:20 schrieb Wol:
On 29/01/2023 10:03, Mark Knoop wrote:
I think Wim may be referring to the various standards of transposing the
B-flat bass clarinet.
- either in bass clef a major 2nd higher than sounding (as in this
Strauss excerpt)
IME (I'm a trombone player) this is
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Am 29.01.23 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Valentin Petzel writes:
>>
>>> Hello David,
>>>
>>> in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in
>>> say piano music where something like this would make sense.
>> I'd say that proportion seems lo
Am 29.01.23 um 17:36 schrieb Valentin Petzel:
Hello David,
in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in say piano
music where something like this would make sense.
Additionally, Schenker graphs would be an obvious example where beaming
over skips is useful. (But of c
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Am 29.01.23 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Valentin Petzel writes:
>>
>>> Hello David,
>>>
>>> in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in
>>> say piano music where something like this would make sense.
>> I'd say that proportion seems lo
On 29/01/2023 10:03, Mark Knoop wrote:
I think Wim may be referring to the various standards of transposing the
B-flat bass clarinet.
- either in bass clef a major 2nd higher than sounding (as in this
Strauss excerpt)
IME (I'm a trombone player) this is extremely unusual. I've met maybe
tw
Am 29.01.23 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
Valentin Petzel writes:
Hello David,
in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in
say piano music where something like this would make sense.
I'd say that proportion seems low enough that providing automatisms for
it is mor
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Hello David,
>
> in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in
> say piano music where something like this would make sense.
I'd say that proportion seems low enough that providing automatisms for
it is more likely to cause confusion than help.
-
Hello David,
in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in say piano
music where something like this would make sense.
Valentin
Am Sonntag, 29. Jänner 2023, 15:37:23 CET schrieb David Kastrup:
> Beaming over skips seems like it would produce incomprehensible results.
s
Thank you Valentin,
the version 2 will be VERY useful!
Thanks a lot!
Il giorno dom 29 gen 2023 alle ore 14:23 Valentin Petzel
ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> Basically you want to scale the baseline-skip along with the staff size
> (the
> reason for this is that measurement is in global staff spaces,
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Hello Werner,
>
> I felt it a bit inconsistent to make rests optionally auto beamable
> and to leave skips untouched ...
Beaming over skips seems like it would produce incomprehensible results.
--
David Kastrup
Hello,
Basically you want to scale the baseline-skip along with the staff size (the
reason for this is that measurement is in global staff spaces, not in layout
staff spaces).
You can achieve this in multiple ways:
Version 0: Simply use the staff space as baseline-skip
Version 1: Add a little
At 10:27 on 29 Jan 2023, Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello Werner,
> this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit:
> https://gitlab.com/vpetzel/lilypond/-/commit/5267b574d27316b7c5d45080b32200dabc5d37dc[1]
> Using this test:
> {
> c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'
Oh,
it works very well!
Sometimes I get lost in a glass of water..
Thank you!!
Il giorno dom 29 gen 2023 alle ore 12:09 Aaron Hill <
lilyp...@hillvisions.com> ha scritto:
> On 2023-01-29 1:16 am, Rip _Mus wrote:
> > in "\override #'(baseline-skip . 0.8)" I'm trying to scale the
> > baseline-skip
>> Veeery nice, thanks! I only wonder what situation you envision to
>> add a special property for skips...
>
> \version "2.24.0"
>
> \new Staff \relative
> <<
> { c'8[ s s c] }
> \\
> { s c c s }
>>>
>
> doesn't seem unreasonable to me (for example in piano music).
OK, thanks.
Wer
On 2023-01-29 1:16 am, Rip _Mus wrote:
in "\override #'(baseline-skip . 0.8)" I'm trying to scale the
baseline-skip according to the part staff size (16), in fact 16/20 =
0.8. I'd like to make this snippet more generic.
I tried to point, from within the markup, to the Clef grob staff-symbol
prope
Hi Werner,
Am 29.01.23 um 11:30 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
IMHO, there are definitely valid situations where
automatic beaming over rests does make sense.
this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit:
[...]
Veeery nice, thanks! I only wonder what situation you envision to ad
> > IMHO, there are definitely valid situations where
> > automatic beaming over rests does make sense.
>
> this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit:
> [...]
Veeery nice, thanks! I only wonder what situation you envision to add
a special property for skips...
Werner
If it’s bass clarinet notation we’re talking about then all that’s needed is
transpose up one octave and make the clef treble throughout.
hth
Damian
> On 29 Jan 2023, at 09:55, Thomas Scharkowski
> wrote:
>
> Hi Wim,
>
> I looked at the score of the Menuet - I do not find anything extraord
I think Wim may be referring to the various standards of transposing the
B-flat bass clarinet.
- either in bass clef a major 2nd higher than sounding (as in this
Strauss excerpt)
- or in treble clef a major 9th higher than sounding (which is what he
wants)
But Wim, we need some of your LilyP
Hi Wim,
I looked at the score of the Menuet - I do not find anything extraordinary
there. The Bass clarinet in B flat (Si b) is transposed as usual. I still do
not understand what you mean by „German“ and „French notation“.
Thomas
BTW: The French Horn parts (4 Corni) are also transposed, these
We can only guess at what you possibly mean. Can you please make
yourself clear?
If there is a problem with English, perhaps you could write in your own
language. Even though this is an English language list, there is sure to
be somebody here who will understand. I mean no disrespect here in a
Hi Wim,
not sure what you mean by „proper french notation“.
If you are referring to note names then you could try Frescobaldi. It has built
in functionality to convert between the various note names.
Kind regards,
Michael
Mobil gesendet
> Am 29.01.2023 um 09:44 schrieb Wim van Dommelen :
>
Hello Werner,
this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit:
https://gitlab.com/vpetzel/lilypond/-/commit/5267b574d27316b7c5d45080b32200dabc5d37dc[1]
Using this test:
{
c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' | r r r r s s s s \break
\set autoBeamRests = ##t
c'8 d'
Hello,
please, take a look:
%%%
\version "2.24.0"
xclefon = {
\set Staff.clefPosition = #3
\override Staff.Clef.stencil = #(lambda (grob)
(parenthesize-stencil
(grob-interpret-markup grob
Hello Wim,
may you please take the effort to provide enough information for your question
to be comprehesible?
If this is about german lute tablature then as far as I know there has not
been done anything on this, but then I don’t understand how the key should
make problems.
Cheers,
Valentin
Hi Wim,
could you provide short example?
Thomas
PS: I do not unterstand this sentence: << I want to play it properly notation
(which is „French“ >>
>
> Am 29.01.2023 um 09:43 schrieb Wim van Dommelen :
>
> I encountered a piece written in so-called "German notation" and I want to
> play it
I encountered a piece written in so-called "German notation" and I want to
play it properly notation (which is "French"
I can do the basic transposes but the key is always interfering and produces
strange results.
Is there a quick Lilypond recipe to convert this (from "German" to "French"
wri
48 matches
Mail list logo
