At 10:27 on 29 Jan 2023, Valentin Petzel wrote: > Hello Werner,
> this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit: > https://gitlab.com/vpetzel/lilypond/-/commit/5267b574d27316b7c5d45080b32200dabc5d37dc[1] > Using this test: > { > c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' | r r r r s s s s \break > \set autoBeamRests = ##t > c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' | r r r r s s s s \break > \set autoBeamRests = ##f \set autoBeamSkips = ##t > c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' | r r r r s s s s \break > \set autoBeamRests = ##t > c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' | r r r r s s s s > } > this produces the appended result. > Valentin This is great! It would be nice if there were an option to beam only over *enclosed* rests/spaces, i.e. c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' would result in: c'8[ d' r e'] r f'[ g'] r | r r r a'\noBeam b'[ s s c''] Could this be possible? -- Mark Knoop
