>> John, can you set up
>>
>> http://jmroper.com/lilypond/
>>
>> with `blended' together with a README so that we can inspect the
>> source code, CSS, etc., and the necessary steps to create it? I
>> think only a direct comparison can answer our questions.
>
> Yes I can. I also have a Github r
Hi David,
> The fact that these workarounds exist prompts the question:
> if the problem can be worked around, why must we continue
> to have a problem to work around?
If the problem that humans can’t fly unassisted can be worked around [by way of
aircraft], why must we continue to have the prob
Thanks, Trevor.
Mason
On 7 February 2017 at 13:51, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Mason Hock wrote Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:13 AM
>
> > I would like to align all dynamics within each system with just enough
> padding
> > to avoid collisions. I could do this by using
> > \override DynamicLineS
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 23:01 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2017-02-04 15:10 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler :
> > So my question is: is there any good reason why Lilypond still does
> > not
> > allow multiple marks or tempo markings?
> >
> > If the answer to that question really is "yes", then perhaps w
2017-02-04 15:10 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler :
> A text mark in Lilypond is represented by a grob called a
> RehearsalMark; the grob for a tempo marking is called a MetronomeMark.
>
> I wonder whether perhaps these names reflect something about the
> history of Lilypond: they are certainly not accurate
Mason Hock wrote Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:13 AM
> I would like to align all dynamics within each system with just enough
> padding
> to avoid collisions. I could do this by using
> \override DynamicLineSpanner.staff-padding = #x
> at the beginning of each system, but if I do anything th
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 14:59 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> How would you deal with the case where \songName landed on a break?
> That's the problem I've had to wrestle with in the past. You'd want
> the fermata at the end of a line but the song title at the start of
> the next.
In the particular cas
On Tue 07 Feb 2017 at 10:34:14 (+), David Sumbler wrote:
> Thank you all for the various suggestions regarding this problem.
>
> Some of the latest posts have left me slightly bewildered: I wasn't
> aware that there was a problem with having a RehearsalMark and a
> MetronomeMark at the same po
On 07.02.2017 09:17, David Kastrup wrote:
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
So my question is: is there any good reason why Lilypond still does
not allow multiple marks or tempo markings?
I can't answer that, but here's a way to get a rehearsal mark and a tempo
mark at the same point in time, u
On 07.02.2017 21:25, Tiago Morin wrote:
Hi David,
Thank's for the reply. It doesn't seem to work on 2.18.2:
That’s because the code from that linked-to post isn’t in the LilyPond
core. You have to paste it into your input file, or save it as a library
file and use \include.
Here it is once
Hi David,
Thank's for the reply. It doesn't seem to work on 2.18.2:
error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression beginning here
#
(key-signature::special-print `((2 . ,red)))
Unbound variable: key-signature::special-print
Any guess?
Thank's
Tiago
On 7 February 2017 at 13:14, David
Yes, brain fart from me :-)
IIRC the problem is when you run the command with --doc in a directory
different from where the .sh file is located.
Sorry, I'm away from my computer and can't double-check in the tracker.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
On 07.02.2017 17:15, Federico Bruni wrote:
There's an open issue in the tracker about a bug triggered by the --prefix
option. If you use --doc without --prefix it should work, but it will be
installed under /usr/local.
I always use both, so that really can’t be much of a problem.
Best, Simon
Because it was incorrect syntax, but not shown as such in the logfile. Correct
syntax was still \mark \default
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Flaming Hakama by Elaine
To: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: Multiple m
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>> > I mean that the code for RehearsalMark was just a wrapper round an
>> > ordinary mark. So if you tried to put both on the same barline, the
>> > underlying engine just saw two ordinary marks, and threw one away. That
>> > was very frustrating back then.
>>
>>
> > I mean that the code for RehearsalMark was just a wrapper round an
> > ordinary mark. So if you tried to put both on the same barline, the
> > underlying engine just saw two ordinary marks, and threw one away. That
> > was very frustrating back then.
>
> What exactly do you mean by “back then”?
On Tue 07 Feb 2017 at 11:22:29 (-), Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Hwaen Ch'uqi"
>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 10:52 AM
> Subject: Documentation question.
>
>
> >Greetings All,
> >
> >I have been trying to install lilypond-2.18.2 along with its
> >docu
There's an open issue in the tracker about a bug triggered by the --prefix
option. If you use --doc without --prefix it should work, but it will be
installed under /usr/local.
Il 07 feb 2017 15:18 Hwaen Ch'uqi ha scritto:
>
> Greetings Phil,
>
> Thank you so much for the mirroring site. All is
Wols Lists writes:
> On 07/02/17 13:39, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>> Hi Wols,
>>
>>> I mean that the code for RehearsalMark was just a wrapper round an
>>> ordinary mark. So if you tried to put both on the same barline, the
>>> underlying engine just saw two ordinary marks, and threw one away. Tha
On 07/02/17 14:33, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Wols,
>
>> Before then :-) - some time last century :-)
>
> Is there anyone on the list who can verify when this was a problem? i.e.,
> which version it stopped being a problem.
> I’m seriously curious!
>
>> I started using lily with 2.4, and I wa
Hi Wols,
> Before then :-) - some time last century :-)
Is there anyone on the list who can verify when this was a problem? i.e., which
version it stopped being a problem.
I’m seriously curious!
> I started using lily with 2.4, and I was forever cursing that "feature”.
Hmm… I started with 2.1,
Greetings Phil,
Thank you so much for the mirroring site. All is now installed.
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On 2/7/17, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hwaen Ch'uqi"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 10:52 AM
> Subject: Documentation question.
>
>
>> Greetings All,
>>
>> I
On 07/02/17 13:39, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Wols,
>
>> I mean that the code for RehearsalMark was just a wrapper round an
>> ordinary mark. So if you tried to put both on the same barline, the
>> underlying engine just saw two ordinary marks, and threw one away. That
>> was very frustrating ba
Am 07.02.2017 um 14:50 schrieb David Nalesnik:
>> You can "go higher," too: use parentage (ly:grob-parent), or get the
>> grob's associated paper column with ly:item::get-column.
> Use ly:item::get-column on the spanner's bounds (ly:spanner-bound) or
> on any *Item*, for example, one of the spann
Noeck writes:
> Dear Peter,
>
> Am 07.02.2017 um 14:04 schrieb Peter Toye:
>> I'd have expected a Dynamic staff to be a descendent of Staff. I was wrong!
>
> This is wrong in your case. But it is not completely out of scope. A
> TabStaff for instance is derived from a Staff:
>
> \new TabStaff {
>
Hi David,
thank you for the hints and explanations.
Am 07.02.2017 um 14:34 schrieb David Nalesnik:
> Hi Urs,
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> if I override a Tie/Slur's stencil I can easily (well, now, after your
>> help ...) get to the note columns at both
Dear Peter,
Am 07.02.2017 um 14:04 schrieb Peter Toye:
> I'd have expected a Dynamic staff to be a descendent of Staff. I was wrong!
This is wrong in your case. But it is not completely out of scope. A
TabStaff for instance is derived from a Staff:
\new TabStaff {
\override Staff.Clef.font-siz
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:34 AM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi Urs,
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> if I override a Tie/Slur's stencil I can easily (well, now, after your
>> help ...) get to the note columns at both ends.
>>
>> Is it possible to retrieve a list o
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:34 AM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi Urs,
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> if I override a Tie/Slur's stencil I can easily (well, now, after your
>> help ...) get to the note columns at both ends.
>>
>> Is it possible to retrieve a list o
Hi Wols,
> I mean that the code for RehearsalMark was just a wrapper round an
> ordinary mark. So if you tried to put both on the same barline, the
> underlying engine just saw two ordinary marks, and threw one away. That
> was very frustrating back then.
What exactly do you mean by “back then”?
Hi Urs,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> if I override a Tie/Slur's stencil I can easily (well, now, after your
> help ...) get to the note columns at both ends.
>
> Is it possible to retrieve a list of all objects *between* those ends too?
> Concretely I would like
Tiago,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Tiago Morin wrote:
> Is there a way to color just one of the accidentals of a key signature?
> For example: I'd like to color in red the d sharp of the "\key e \major" ,
> leaving the rest of the accidentals in default color.
>
Try the code here:
http://www
Mark,
Thanks. I'm used to object-oriented programming, in which I'd have expected a
Dynamic staff to be a descendent of Staff. I was wrong!
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Tuesday, February 7, 2017, 12:01:40 PM, you wrote:
> At 11:52 on 07
Is there a way to color just one of the accidentals of a key signature?
For example: I'd like to color in red the d sharp of the "\key e \major" ,
leaving the rest of the accidentals in default color.
Thanks in advance.
Tiago
___
lilypond-user mailing l
At 11:52 on 07 Feb 2017, Peter Toye wrote:
>Wanting to use bracket style pedals. The snippet below gives me 19-th
>century style "Ped" mark. What am I doing wrong please?
A Dynamics context is not a Staff context. See below...
>\version "2.19.52"
>
>\language "english"
>
>\score {
> <<
>\new
Wanting to use bracket style pedals. The snippet below gives me 19-th century
style "Ped" mark. What am I doing wrong please?
\version "2.19.52"
\language "english"
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
\clef "treble"
\relative {
c''4 d e f | g f e d | c d e f
}
}
\n
I'm trying to engrave a highly repetitive piano part using repeats as much as
possible to save page-turns, but I need to display the bar numbers as if the
repeats were written out (other parts don't repeat). It seems to me that this
raises three issues, to none of which have I found a solution i
- Original Message -
From: "Hwaen Ch'uqi"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 10:52 AM
Subject: Documentation question.
Greetings All,
I have been trying to install lilypond-2.18.2 along with its
documentation. From the command line, I have called
sudo sh lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-6
>
> John, can you set up
>
> http://jmroper.com/lilypond/
>
> with `blended' together with a README so that we can inspect the
> source code, CSS, etc., and the necessary steps to create it? I think
> only a direct comparison can answer our questions.
>
Yes I can. I also have a Github repositor
Greetings All,
I have been trying to install lilypond-2.18.2 along with its
documentation. From the command line, I have called
sudo sh lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh --prefix /usr/ --documentation
LilyPond itself installs just fine, but I get these messages relative
to the documentation:
No ./l
Thank you all for the various suggestions regarding this problem.
Some of the latest posts have left me slightly bewildered: I wasn't
aware that there was a problem with having a RehearsalMark and a
MetronomeMark at the same point in a piece. Of course, they are
formatted and aligned differently
Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, February 07, 2017 9:21 AM
>
> Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote Tuesday, February 07, 2017 2:00 AM
>
>> I can't answer that, but here's a way to get a rehearsal mark and a tempo
>> mark at the same point in time, using an empty chord:
>
>
> \version "2.19.15"
> {
Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote Tuesday, February 07, 2017 2:00 AM
> I can't answer that, but here's a way to get a rehearsal mark and a tempo
> mark at the same point in time, using an empty chord:
\version "2.19.15"
{
R1
\mark
<>\tempo Allegro 4=120
R1
}
This works in 2.19.1
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>> > > So my question is: is there any good reason why Lilypond still does
>> > > not allow multiple marks or tempo markings?
>>
>
> I can't answer that, but here's a way to get a rehearsal mark and a tempo
> mark at the same point in time, using an empty chord:
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
