Urs,
> I think you're missing something: the double backslash construct that David
> uses already creates the voices as \voiceOne \voiceTwo etc. implicitly. So if
> that isn't good enough engraving-wise then setting it manually should not
> make any difference
Thanks for that. I had become rea
> I'm not sure about using << ... // ... >> to make it "infinitely
expandable"... wouldn't the output become illegible past 4 voices? If
you're mechanically generating these parts, I'd say keep it to 2 voices
per staff, which is least problematic. In theory, it should be easy for
the program to al
Am 26. Oktober 2016 16:56:16 GMT-07:00, schrieb "H. S. Teoh"
:
>On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:52:18PM -0700, David Bellows wrote:
>> > Do you use the \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, \voiceThree commands in the
>> > generated parts? Sometimes those can help, by rendering rests for
>> > each voice separately.
On Wed 26 Oct 2016 at 23:14:20 (+0200), Michael Gerdau wrote:
> > please excuse this sidenote: It seems that your mailing client doesn’t
> > handle metadata correctly, so each reply of yours is technically
> > regarded as starting a new thread. It would be good if you could find a
> > way (or can s
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:52:18PM -0700, David Bellows wrote:
> > Do you use the \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, \voiceThree commands in the
> > generated parts? Sometimes those can help, by rendering rests for
> > each voice separately. Not sure if this is the solution you're
> > looking for, though.
>
>
> Do you use the \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, \voiceThree commands in the
generated parts? Sometimes those can help, by rendering rests for each
voice separately. Not sure if this is the solution you're looking for,
though.
I had been but keeping it all straight and making the process
infinitely expanda
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:10:49PM -0700, David Bellows wrote:
> I have a large computer music generating program that I'm creating.
> One of the things it does is generate sheet music for the generated
> music using Lilypond. It works really well.
>
> When dealing with one or two voices everythin
Hi all,
>> I'm trying to control the page numbering for bookparts in a score.
>> In particular I want each bookpart start with page #1 and omit it
>> on the first page. Therefor I'm adding a paper block inside bookpart
>> and set
>>first-page-number = #1
>>print-first-page-number = ##f
>>
So sorry everyone, I forgot to use reply all. Here's my latest message:
Ok, this all might be confusing so I've attached two example pngs
showing the collisions. The use_rest.png file uses rests like c'4/rest
while no_rest just uses regular rests like r4. I know I could
manipulate these manually t
2016-10-26 15:29 GMT+02:00 Michael Gerdau :
> Hi list,
>
> I'm trying to control the page numbering for bookparts in a score.
> In particular I want each bookpart start with page #1 and omit it
> on the first page. Therefor I'm adding a paper block inside bookpart
> and set
> first-page-number
Hi David,
> When dealing with one or two voices everything's fine. But I just
> added a musical style that uses three voices and collisions with rests
> are occurring.
[more stuff on avoiding rest collisions snipped]
You may wish to look at http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=336
That should s
> please excuse this sidenote: It seems that your mailing client doesn’t
> handle metadata correctly, so each reply of yours is technically
> regarded as starting a new thread. It would be good if you could find a
> way (or can someone help) to fix this. Not only may others have thread
> view enabl
I have a large computer music generating program that I'm creating.
One of the things it does is generate sheet music for the generated
music using Lilypond. It works really well.
When dealing with one or two voices everything's fine. But I just
added a musical style that uses three voices and col
On Tue 25 Oct 2016 at 21:48:35 (+0200), Bálint Laczkó wrote:
> I would like to engrave a polytempical musical material in LilyPond. I am a
> newbie to this software so I am still learning the basics, but I saw quite
> a few mentions in some forum comments here and there, that LilyPond support
> pol
On 10/26/16 9:28 AM, "Urs Liska" wrote:
>
>
>Am 26. Oktober 2016 06:14:42 GMT-07:00, schrieb Kieren MacMillan
>:
>>Hi Urs,
>>
>>> Anyone here saying that applying for this
>>https://developers.google.com/open-source/gci/ would make sense for
>>LilyPond?
>>
>>Is there an obvious reason why it w
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Karol Majewski wrote:
> OK, I resign. But stil I don't get something in the code you posted yesterday:
>
> %
>
> raiseTie =
> #(lambda (grob)
> (let* ((ties (ly:grob-array->list (ly:grob-object grob 'ties)))
> (notehead (ly:spanner-bo
Am 26. Oktober 2016 06:14:42 GMT-07:00, schrieb Kieren MacMillan
:
>Hi Urs,
>
>> Anyone here saying that applying for this
>https://developers.google.com/open-source/gci/ would make sense for
>LilyPond?
>
>Is there an obvious reason why it wouldn’t make sense?
>(I don’t know enough about that p
Hello Karol,
please excuse this sidenote: It seems that your mailing client doesn’t
handle metadata correctly, so each reply of yours is technically
regarded as starting a new thread. It would be good if you could find a
way (or can someone help) to fix this. Not only may others have thread
v
OK, I resign. But stil I don't get something in the code you posted yesterday:
%
raiseTie =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((ties (ly:grob-array->list (ly:grob-object grob 'ties)))
(notehead (ly:spanner-bound (car ties) LEFT))
(stem (ly:grob-object notehead 'stem))
Hi list,
I'm trying to control the page numbering for bookparts in a score.
In particular I want each bookpart start with page #1 and omit it
on the first page. Therefor I'm adding a paper block inside bookpart
and set
first-page-number = #1
print-first-page-number = ##f
(see the attached
Cvc VP ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Urs,
> Anyone here saying that applying for this
> https://developers.google.com/open-source/gci/ would make sense for LilyPond?
Is there an obvious reason why it wouldn’t make sense?
(I don’t know enough about that program to tell.)
Thanks,
Kieren.
Kieren
On 2016-10-26 14:11, Bálint Laczkó wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for the fast reply!
"Essentially, you will have one "master staff" that stays true to time,
everything else is scaled to fit." -- so I can change the spacing(?) of
the staves individually in reference to an original spacing? So if
s
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Karol Majewski wrote:
> OK, David, so let's move one square backward and try to use staff-position.
> The following code does compile but doesn't do what I want. Perhaps what I'm
> trying to achieve is just not possible.
I don't think it is.
Carl's email explai
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for the fast reply!
"Essentially, you will have one "master staff" that stays true to time,
everything else is scaled to fit." -- so I can change the spacing(?) of the
staves individually in reference to an original spacing? So if staff1 is in
default spacing, then can staff2
On 10/26/16 3:28 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>Su why is a symbol needed? Symbols always require some secret lookup
>mechanism. Why not just use a list here? When the list needs to be
>calculated, it can be a callback, right?
That was my hope, but I couldn't make it work.
The reason I coul
OK, David, so let's move one square backward and try to use staff-position. The
following code does compile but doesn't do what I want. Perhaps what I'm trying
to achieve is just not possible.
%%
tweakTie =
#(lambda
(grob)
(let*
((ties
(ly:grob-array->list
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 10/25/16 8:57 AM, "Chris Yate" wrote:
>
>>Hi Carl,
>>Firstly, thanks for your work on this!
>>At a quick glance, the only two situations that need dots-limit =2 are
>>#11 and #23.
>
> Yes, those were my two cases as well.
>
>>A side issue:
>>An idea I've just had: woul
On 2016-10-25 21:48, Bálint Laczkó wrote:
Hey Everybody,
I would like to engrave a polytempical musical material in LilyPond. [...]
Now ideally I would like to see this engraved in a proportional way, so
that the lower staff has a wider spacing, and so the notes are
distributed in the two staves
29 matches
Mail list logo
