On 10/26/16 9:28 AM, "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
> > >Am 26. Oktober 2016 06:14:42 GMT-07:00, schrieb Kieren MacMillan ><kie...@alumni.rice.edu>: >>Hi Urs, >> >>> Anyone here saying that applying for this >>https://developers.google.com/open-source/gci/ would make sense for >>LilyPond? >> >>Is there an obvious reason why it wouldn¹t make sense? >>(I don¹t know enough about that program to tell.) > >The question if it's reasonable for us to have one or more teenage >students work on "bite-sized" challenges. And if that chance justifies >the potentially significant work on our side. If we had somebody who was willing to identify a list of 3-5 hour challenges, it might be good not only for the Google Code-in project, but also for a way of getting new developers involved. However, organizing this is a lot of work, and we don't currently have anybody with the time and inclination to do this, as far as I can see. But I think anybody who is considering doing the effort to head up a GCI project list should understand that there is potential benefit beyond GCI. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
