latest news

Hey, Did you hear the latest news? You should definetely read more info here Warmest regards, m...@mouries.net -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/latest-news-tp191085.html Sent from the User mailing list arch

Re: my message

Hi, I was looking for some stuff on the web and found this, you're gonna like it, just take a look here Yours, m...@mouries.net -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-my-message-tp191084.html Sent from the User mail

useful stuff

Hello, I've heard you were looking for that stuff for a long time, so I finally found it for you, read more here Warmest regards, m...@mouries.net -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/useful-stuff-tp191078

some new stuff

Hey, Don't miss up this new stuff, you're going to be delighted, read more here Wishes, m...@mouries.net -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/some-new-stuff-tp191075.html Sent from the User mailing list arch

surprise!

Hi, That's gonna surprise you a lot, just take a look In haste, m...@mouries.net -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/surprise-tp191073.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com._

i'm so excited

Hello! Just take a look at the info I just found, I'm so excited, check it out at Faithfully, m...@mouries.net -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/i-m-so-excited-tp191074.html Sent from the User mailing list ar

Give it a try

Hello, I think you have to try this thing, it's so hilarious, take a look at My best to you, m...@mouries.net -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Give-it-a-try-tp191067.html Sent from the User mailing list arc

I found it!

Hey, I think I've found the thing you were looking for, just take a look here Very truly yours, m...@mouries.net -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/I-found-it-tp191066.html Sent from the User mailing list archive

Re: slur corehack

> > On a related note, I've found that looking at the various interface links > shown at the bottom of the grob properties pages can lead to otherwise > unknown definitions to cryptic properties. For example, on the Slur > properties page ( > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals/sl

Re: repeat and dynamic

In the line of using a master to hold all dynamic information, I’d prefer: << \repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 } \\ { s1\p\< | s1 | s2. s4\! } >> JM > Le 27 mai 2016 à 22:11, Gianmaria Lari a écrit : > >>> Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something >>> l

Re: repeat and dynamic

>> Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something >> like this (that of course does not work): >> >> \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5} \! >> > > << > \repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 } > { s1\p\< | s1 | s2. s4\! } > >> Oh! You're right, it work

Re: repeat and dynamic

Am 27.05.2016 um 18:50 schrieb Toine Schreurs: Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain the same notes but different dynamic information: \version "2.19.40" { a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \! } Is there any way to writ

Re: repeat and dynamic

> Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain > the same notes but different dynamic information: > > \version "2.19.40" > { > a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 > a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 > a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \! > } > > Is there any way to write the previous code using a re

repeat and dynamic

Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain the same notes but different dynamic information: \version "2.19.40" { a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \! } Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something like t

Re: OT: chord naming question

Am 27.05.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 27.05.2016 um 14:20 schrieb Marc Hohl: Write the highest note as an a# and consider it as an added 13#. Write the upper notes as c-e-bf and interpret it as bitonal (C7 over csharp). Ok. If I include the g-sharp I got C7#5 over c#. Wow. That'd be

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

On 27/05/2016 07:16, Michael Hendry wrote: Other mysteries (to me!) may also be explained in a similar way: Why aren’t trumpets and clarinets made a bit shorter, so that they don’t have to have transposed parts? Well, they DON'T need transposed parts. You just need to learn a different mapping

Re: OT: chord naming question

Am 27.05.2016 um 14:20 schrieb Marc Hohl: >> Write the highest note as an a# and consider it as an added 13#. >> >> Write the upper notes as c-e-bf and interpret it as bitonal (C7 over >> csharp). > > Ok. If I include the g-sharp I got C7#5 over c#. Wow. That'd be an option but I meant something

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

> On 27 May 2016, at 08:16, Michael Hendry wrote: >> Don't forget, G# and Fb are NOT the same note. > > This is where my lack of formal musical education shows me up - I’m a > self-taught amateur guitarist. F# and Gb look and sound the same on the > guitar (and on the piano), but it seems tha

Re: OT: chord naming question

Am 27.05.2016 um 12:52 schrieb Thomas Morley: [...] Hi Harm, Hi Marc, is it an excerpt of an already printed piece (looks vaguely familiar to me)? No – it is a piece of mine, written some years ago for a (progressive) rock band. I want to re-use the chords and melody for a musical project.

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

> Le 27 mai 2016 à 08:16, Michael Hendry a écrit : > Other instruments are constructed and tuned so as to sound good in certain > keys and not so good in others, so it’s feasible that an orchestra could > sound better playing in sharp keys. I was told that the open string settings of the stri

Re: OT: chord naming question

Am 27.05.2016 um 13:11 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 27. Mai 2016 12:58:10 MESZ, schrieb Michael Hendry : On 27 May 2016, at 11:36, Marc Hohl wrote: Hi list, as there are already (partly very emotional) dicussions concerning F# vs. Gb in another (hijacked) thread, https://lists.gnu.org/archive

Re: OT: chord naming question

Am 27. Mai 2016 12:58:10 MESZ, schrieb Michael Hendry : > >> On 27 May 2016, at 11:36, Marc Hohl wrote: >> >> Hi list, >> >> as there are already (partly very emotional) dicussions concerning >> F# vs. Gb in another (hijacked) thread, >> >https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

> On 27 May 2016, at 09:59, Thomas Morley wrote: > > 2016-05-27 8:16 GMT+02:00 Michael Hendry : >> >>> On 27 May 2016, at 00:53, Wols Lists wrote: >>> >>> On 26/05/16 10:43, Olivier Biot wrote: On Thursday, 26 May 2016, Michael Hendry >>> > wr

Re: OT: chord naming question

> On 27 May 2016, at 11:36, Marc Hohl wrote: > > Hi list, > > as there are already (partly very emotional) dicussions concerning > F# vs. Gb in another (hijacked) thread, > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-05/msg00418.html > I hope to get some information *without* starting

Re: OT: chord naming question

2016-05-27 12:36 GMT+02:00 Marc Hohl : > Hi list, > > as there are already (partly very emotional) dicussions concerning > F# vs. Gb in another (hijacked) thread, > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-05/msg00418.html > I hope to get some information *without* starting a flame war

Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

2016-05-07 21:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : >>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1036 > I'll let it unapproved for few more days in case somebody comes up > with further suggestions. > > Thanks a lot for review., > Harm Approved. Cheers, Harm __

OT: chord naming question

Hi list, as there are already (partly very emotional) dicussions concerning F# vs. Gb in another (hijacked) thread, https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-05/msg00418.html I hope to get some information *without* starting a flame war ;-) I have the following chord played on a guit

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

2016-05-27 10:44 GMT+02:00 Martin Tarenskeen : > > Reminds we of this version of a well known birthday song ... > > For the laziest, \version "2.19.41" \header { title = "Fatal Birthday" } \score { \relative { \time 3/4 \partial 4 deses'8. bis16 cisis4 deses eis fes2 bis,8. des

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

2016-05-27 8:16 GMT+02:00 Michael Hendry : > >> On 27 May 2016, at 00:53, Wols Lists wrote: >> >> On 26/05/16 10:43, Olivier Biot wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, 26 May 2016, Michael Hendry >> > wrote: >>> >>>I seem to have struck an interesting chord, here! >>

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

On Fri, 27 May 2016, David Kastrup wrote: Wols Lists writes: Don't forget, G# and Fb are NOT the same note. Cough cough. Reminds we of this version of a well known birthday song ... -- MT___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org h

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

Wols Lists writes: > Don't forget, G# and Fb are NOT the same note. Cough cough. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user