Re: lengthening broken ties

>> In bar 2 you can see the effect of `minimum-length-after-break'. > > You mean bar 4--bar 2 is the default. Of course. Typo. >> Any chance to fix this? BTW, if you compare bar 2 with bar 6, you >> see exactly the opposite effect w.r.t. the default tie length: with >> a time signature the ti

CueDuringWithClef problems

Hello folks, I can’t get the slurs in « Largo_Flute » nor R2 in the argument to \cueDuringWithClef to be displayed in the following example. Here is the log contents: Starting lilypond 2.19.15 [CueVoiceExample.ly]... Traitement de « /Users/menu/Documents/LaTeX/PartitionsLilypond/CueVoiceExampl

Re: repeat tremolo - warning message

Thank you, Thomas & PhilImmanuel,Ming On Sunday, February 15, 2015 1:06 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: 2015-02-15 16:56 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes : > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1444 > > -- > Phil Holmes > > > > - Original Message - > From: MING TSANG > To: lilyp

Re: Git/Lilypond workflow

Thanks for this thread. I'm find this of real interest to me, for several reasons. I've had the question myself, and turned away from Git-engagement because I couldn't "see the light". I'm off to read the blog post. Should be interesting! Tom On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 5:16 PM, wrote: > Am 2015-02

Re: Git/Lilypond workflow

Am 2015-02-15 15:19, schrieb RomanticStrings: What is the benefit of using Git? I understand that it keeps track of changes, so you can check your log and even retrieve previous versions(?). I use my home MacBook Pro and my work (sacred music director) PC laptop, and I have both a Dropbox an

Re: Git/Lilypond workflow

Am 15.02.2015 21:19, schrieb RomanticStrings: What is the benefit of using Git? I understand that it keeps track of changes, so you can check your log and even retrieve previous versions(?). I use my home MacBook Pro and my work (sacred music director) PC laptop, and I have both a Dropbox and

Re: \articulate command doesn't handle {c4 4}

2015-02-15 18:25 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht : > Hello, > > the support for standalone durations was one of the first (and most > important?) changes made in 2.19 (see > >

Re: Git/Lilypond workflow

What is the benefit of using Git? I understand that it keeps track of changes, so you can check your log and even retrieve previous versions(?). I use my home MacBook Pro and my work (sacred music director) PC laptop, and I have both a Dropbox and Google Drive account. It seems like Git doesn't

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

Hi, > What I was missing was to put the note between brackets, like in your > example: "[ b]” This may not be the best way of thinking about it. Rather, think that you need to put the [ immediately after the first note in the beam group, and the ] immediately after the last note in the beam gr

Re: repeat tremolo - warning message

2015-02-15 16:56 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes : > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1444 > > -- > Phil Holmes > > > > - Original Message - > From: MING TSANG > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 2:48 PM > Subject: repeat tremolo - warning message > > lily

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

THANKS. What I was missing was to put the note between brackets, like in your example: "[ b]" ... Thanks again. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Uncorrect-beams-tp171918p171926.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

Hi, \relative c'' { c4 b a g16 b a8\noBeam } should do fine too. Cheers, Pierre 2015-02-15 18:15 GMT+01:00 Klaus Blum : > It seems that you have to apply \autoBeamOff BEFORE a beam group starts. > You > can manually start/stop beams by using brackets: > > %

Re: \articulate command doesn't handle {c4 4}

Hello, the support for standalone durations was one of the first (and most important?) changes made in 2.19 (see . But indeed, it seems to be a bug if \articulate can't handle them. Yours, Simon Am 15.02.2015 15:26, schrieb Cyn

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

It seems that you have to apply \autoBeamOff BEFORE a beam group starts. You can manually start/stop beams by using brackets: % -- \version "2.18.2" \relative c'' { c4 b a \autoBeamOff g16[ b] a8 } % -- Cheers, Klaus

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Son_V wrote: > I'm using Frescobaldi, so I can't make this kind of mistakes, :-) , I wrote > these commands meaning I'm using them in the right way ... > I'm writing a score from a printed one made in the beginning of the '900 > ... > > If you want help with this

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

I'm using Frescobaldi, so I can't make this kind of mistakes, :-) , I wrote these commands meaning I'm using them in the right way ... I'm writing a score from a printed one made in the beginning of the '900 ... -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Uncorrect-b

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Son_V wrote: > Hi all, I want to make > > > > But using \autobeamon, \autobeamoff IO get > Capitalization is important: it's \autoBeamOn and \autoBeamOff. --David __

Uncorrect (?) beams

Hi all, I want to make But using \autobeamon, \autobeamoff IO get Where am I wrong? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.

Re: repeat tremolo - warning message

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1444 -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: MING TSANG To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 2:48 PM Subject: repeat tremolo - warning message lily ponders, I ran the following lily code and go

repeat tremolo - warning message

lily ponders, I ran the following lily code and got a warning message.The first and 2nd \repeat tremolo are the same except the pitch. (1)  Why the second \repeat tremolo return a warning message.?(2)  How can I adjust the \repeat tremolo so that it display in the middle of two pitches - ie slan

Re: Cue notes with lyrics?

On 02/14/2015 02:48 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: 2015-02-14 13:27 GMT+01:00 Rutger Hofman : Good morning list, I would like to create cue notes with lyrics. I added lyric-event to the Score.quotedCueEventTypes but that gave me no lyrics. How should I go about this? Thanks, Rutger Hofman Amsterdam

Re: lengthening broken ties

Hi Werner, On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> If it's convenient, have a look at the attached patch/sketch. It > >> adds a property, minimum-length-left-broken, which lets you adjust > >> broken bits that start a line. > > > > Excellent! What an improvement with just

Re: [Announce] Boulez anyone?

2015-02-13 21:38 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley : > 2015-02-13 12:15 GMT+01:00 Noeck : >> Thanks a lot Abraham, it is just great to see all these styles. >> >> You know that, but for all who don't: straight flags and other flag styles >> can >> also be easily set in LilyPond for fonts that support it lik

\articulate command doesn't handle {c4 4}

The Notation Manual seems to allow a naked duration to represent the last pitch with that duration. The following extract from the NM shows what I'm talking about: (you'd think that since we're only on p6, it would be easy to find the explicit permission to do this, but I can't find it. Ma

Re: lengthening broken ties

>> If it's convenient, have a look at the attached patch/sketch. It >> adds a property, minimum-length-left-broken, which lets you adjust >> broken bits that start a line. > > Excellent! What an improvement with just a few lines of code! > Thanks a lot. Now that the change is in the repository

Re: Line Length

William Marchant wrote: How can I control the length of the [bottom] line Have a look at answers in a similar thread last July: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-07/msg00341.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-07/msg00371.html Cheers, Robin [bottom

Re: \articulate command and "rit." was: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 147, Issue 102

Speaking only for myself: I regard LilyPond as a music-_typesetting_-program. I don't care much about midi. Nevertheless, the NR clearly states: " A MIDI file is a series of notes in a number of tracks. It is not an actual sound file [...] Pieces of music can be converted to MIDI files, so you ca

Re: "rit." in Midi - was: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 137, Issue 62

> > From: Patrick Karl > > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:18:49 -0600 > > > > I think the most disturbiing thing is that \articulate is interpreting > > "rit." to mean "ritenuto" rather than "ritardando", which I think is > > the most common interpretation of "rit.". It would be great if the > > temp

Re: \sustainOff\sustainOn produces inconsistent MIDI results

I have the same problem too. As a quick solution, I split the note into two with a tie, one for sustainOff and one for sustainOn. If there are no "real" solutions, I guess someone may write a function to automatically achieve this, say, \sustainOffOn -- View this message in context: http://lil