Re: centering full-measure objects (notes and/or rests)

2015-02-04 6:31 GMT+01:00 Jay Anderson : > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: >> 2. Why is this not Lilypond’s default behaviour? As I understand it, >> traditional engraving practice is to centre full-measure objects (notes >> and/or rests) in *any* measure of a piece, as

Re: lengthening broken ties

> I've found no way to make it work. OK, thanks for trying. > Why not tackle the NoteColumn instead? > > \version "2.19.15" > > \paper { > indent = 0 > line-width = 50\mm > ragged-right = #f > } > > { > c''1 ~ \break > \once \override Score.NoteColumn.X-offset = 2 %% or

Re: lengthening broken ties

>> However, this has no effect. I guess this is because because the >> `after-line-breaking' callback is invoked too late in the >> formatting process. > > Yes, it appears that 'minimum-length is consulted before line > breaking happens, in the callback for ly:spanner::set-spacing-rods > (in lil

Re: centering full-measure objects (notes and/or rests)

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > 2. Why is this not Lilypond’s default behaviour? As I understand it, > traditional engraving practice is to centre full-measure objects (notes > and/or rests) in *any* measure of a piece, as long as all staves in the > current system con

centering full-measure objects (notes and/or rests)

Hello all, I have a single chord in the last measure of my piece — unfortunately, it isn’t centered by default: \version "2.19.15" testing = { c''4 c'' c'' c'' | c''1 \bar "|." } \layout { ragged-right = ##f } \score { \testing } 1. How can I fix this? In the archives, I found this thread

Make Table of Content show up in PDF Viewer outline

When i create a table of content in Lilypond (using the doc [1]) the table of content does not appear in the outine view (sidebar usually ) in the PDF Viewer. Whereas when use LateX, the table of content is showed. [1] http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/table-of-contents. Is ther

Re: Shortening volta brackets at two (and more) staves

Hi, On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:35 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Kaj, > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Kaj Persson wrote: > >> In the snippet collection, the "Repeats" section, there is one named >> "Shortening volta brackets". I have use for just this, since in a piece of >> music I need som

Re: Bug in articulate.ly + TrillSpan + full-measure rests

Hi Davide, > I would expect \articulate to correctly handle trill spanners regardless > to what \stopTrillSpan is attached to. Yep, me too. That’s why I said: I don’t know how to fix it. Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https

Re: Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

Another advantage to this is that I don't have to tag a "printed" and "played" version. Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Kevin Barry wrote: > OK I found a much simpler and slightly less hackish way to do it: just add > \once \override Stem.X-offset = #1.25 > before the

Re: Bug in articulate.ly + TrillSpan + full-measure rests

Dear Joram, Il 04/02/15 00.19, Noeck ha scritto: I don’t know how to fix it in articulate but adding <> and moving the \stopTrillSpan before the rest seems to work: Thanks, that is a nice workaround! However I believe this is a bug in articulate.ly. This means: The trill stops visually at th

Re: Rehearsal mark an end of one system and another at the begin of next system

2015-02-04 0:07 GMT+01:00 Noeck : > So I hope there is more help around here on > the list. > Have a look at this mailing list thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg00157.html That multi-mark-engraver works great. -- Peter Crighton | Musician & Music Engraver based i

Re: Bug in articulate.ly + TrillSpan + full-measure rests

Hi Davide, I don’t know how to fix it in articulate but adding <> and moving the \stopTrillSpan before the rest seems to work: \version "2.19.15" \include "articulate.ly" mus = { b1 \startTrillSpan | <> \stopTrillSpan R1 | b2 r | } \new Staff \mus \articulate \mus This means: The trill st

Bug in articulate.ly + TrillSpan + full-measure rests

Dear all, I found a strange behaviour in the interaction of articulate.ly with TrillSpan and full-measure rests. This snippet: \version "2.19.15" \include "articulate.ly" \articulate { b1 \startTrillSpan | R1 \stopTrillSpan | b2 r | } gives a warning: barcheck failed at: 1/2 b2 r

Re: Rehearsal mark an end of one system and another at the begin of next system

Hi I can’t help you out here. But I can briefly explain what happens. All these commands act at the same point in time: > \override Score.RehearsalMark.self-alignment-X = #RIGHT > \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility = #end-of-line-visible > \mark\markup { \bold \italic Fi

Re: lengthening broken ties

2015-02-03 14:40 GMT+01:00 Werner LEMBERG : > > Folks, > > > I'm trying to work around an old problem of broken ties in tightly > setted music: They can degenerate to a dot, having no horizontal > extensions anymore. Following the example in section `Difficult > tweaks' of the notation reference (

Re: Shortening volta brackets at two (and more) staves

Hi Kaj, On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Kaj Persson wrote: > In the snippet collection, the "Repeats" section, there is one named > "Shortening volta brackets". I have use for just this, since in a piece of > music I need some extra space in order to put a mark immediately after the > volta alt

Re: Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

2015-02-03 22:07 GMT+01:00 Kevin Barry : > OK I found a much simpler and slightly less hackish way to do it: just add > \once \override Stem.X-offset = #1.25 \once \override Stem.X-offset = #1.251 is better. ;) look at very high zoom maybe adding colors and layers for Stem and NoteHead. The offset

Shortening volta brackets at two (and more) staves

In the snippet collection, the "Repeats" section, there is one named "Shortening volta brackets". I have use for just this, since in a piece of music I need some extra space in order to put a mark immediately after the volta alternative bracket. So I tested it, and, yes, the example promised we

Rehearsal mark an end of one system and another at the begin of next system

Is there any way to modify the following snippet and get “Fine” at the end of the 1st system and “A” at the begin of the next system. The “A” is discarded because it is deemed to be simultaneous with the “Fine”. The chief reason for using a rehearsal mark for the “Fine”, of course, is to produ

Re: Pianostaff 4-part writing and rests

Hi Keith, > I'll try to change the title and add an example of what we want it to do. Saw the update — looks great. Thanks for doing that. Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _

Re: Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

OK I found a much simpler and slightly less hackish way to do it: just add \once \override Stem.X-offset = #1.25 before the C sharp and that should keep the stem correctly positioned even if other things change. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Kevin Barry wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:42 P

Re: Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Knute Snortum wrote: > That's quite astounding to me. Okay, so you fake a d to get the note head > on the other side of the stem. Then in the lower voice you fake another d, > make it transparent, and shift it right a bit. Have I got it? Yes that's correct (th

Re: Hungarian Gregorian

Thank you all for your kind support. I'm a litlle busy for the moment but will come back asap!! @ Werner: yes no problem at all to change the "stem" length. Cheers, Pierre ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailma

Re: lengthening broken ties

Hi Werner, On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Folks, > > > I'm trying to work around an old problem of broken ties in tightly > setted music: They can degenerate to a dot, having no horizontal > extensions anymore. Following the example in section `Difficult > tweaks' of

Re: Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

That's quite astounding to me. Okay, so you fake a d to get the note head on the other side of the stem. Then in the lower voice you fake another d, make it transparent, and shift it right a bit. Have I got it? Thanks, that works. Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Ke

Re: Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

This is a hackish solution (it involves a hshift that will need tweaking once the score is filled up) but it seems to do what you want. \version "2.18.2" \language "english" upperStaffTop = \relative c' { 4 | } upperStaffBottom = \relative c' { \once \override NoteHead.transparent = ##t

Re: Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

(voice 1, that is, merged with a differently-headded 1/16 th) isn’t the treble clef c a quarter note? > On Feb 3, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Knute Snortum > wrote: > > I am working on a Debussy prelude and I have an odd measure where the up-stem > quarter note is merge with

Re: Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

It is. The typesetter (or Debussy) set it like the first PNG (merge-quarter-with-sixteenth-want.png) Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Stan Sanderson wrote: > isn’t the treble clef c a quarter note? > > On Feb 3, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Knute Snortum wrote: > > I am worki

Re: Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

isn’t the treble clef c a quarter note? > On Feb 3, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Knute Snortum wrote: > > I am working on a Debussy prelude and I have an odd measure where the up-stem > quarter note is merge with the down-stem sixteenth (first beat, see attached > picture). > > > ​ > I have gotten thi

Merge upStem quarter with downStem 16th

I am working on a Debussy prelude and I have an odd measure where the up-stem quarter note is merge with the down-stem sixteenth (first beat, see attached picture). ​ I have gotten this far with typesetting it, but as you can see, the stems aren't merged. ​Any ideas on how to get this to work?

Re: BarNumber vertical positioning won't stay fixed relative to Staff/system

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Nice! This solves the problem completely for this one-Staff score (e.g., > linear instrumental part). > No doubt a similar incantation (e.g., on PianoStaff) will work for my > other scores — I’ll have to che

Re: BarNumber vertical positioning won't stay fixed relative to Staff/system

Hi Kevin, > Have you tried removing bar numbers from the Score context and placing them > in the Staff context instead? viz. > > \layout { > \context { > \Score > \remove "Bar_number_engraver" > } > \context { > \Staff > \consists "Bar_number_engraver" > }

Re: Variables when compiling a book

We at Mutopia.org have been struggling with the same issues, except that we have the extra condition that each separate piece in the collection should also compile on its own. You can see our "flayelings" here: https://github.com/ksnortum/mp-sandbox Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Tue, Feb 3, 2015

Re: BarNumber vertical positioning won't stay fixed relative to Staff/system

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > This may be related to the fact that I have a ScoreMarks (a.k.a. MarkLine) > context at the top of my score: Have you tried removing bar numbers from the Score context and placing them in the Staff context

Re: Variables when compiling a book

On 02/03/2015 08:58 AM, John McWilliam wrote: > You may be right in which case I will have to study your construct > and apply it to my Piobaireachd tunes, however, I was hoping for a > simpler solution. If you cannot see one then I suppose I must bite > the bullet but I'm not very code literate

Re: Variables when compiling a book

>Unfortunately, this is one of the cases where LilyPond use resembles >other kinds of computer programming. You’ll need to refactor your files... This solution presented a completely new mind set for me. The problem is that I already have a considerable collection of bagpipe tunes written without

Re: lengthening broken ties

> They can degenerate to a dot, having no horizontal extensions > anymore. extensions -> extent Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

lengthening broken ties

Folks, I'm trying to work around an old problem of broken ties in tightly setted music: They can degenerate to a dot, having no horizontal extensions anymore. Following the example in section `Difficult tweaks' of the notation reference (with slight changes to change the property for all siblin

Re: Get current file

Am 03.02.2015 um 03:05 schrieb MarcM: Nice. PS: your files indicates \version "2.19.16". Are you working on the DEV version? You mean self-compiled version from Git? Yes. Unfortunately this isn't an indicator of an unnoticed release ;-) Urs -- View this message in context: http://lily