> Can anyone recommend a workaround in the meantime?
You could place a working footnote nearby and fake the number in the lyrics:
\version "2.17.12"
{
a b
\footnote " " #'(0.0 . 0) \markup { \super 1 Footnote for lyrics. }
c' c'
}
\addlyrics { The Ly -- \markup \concat { ric\super 1 } test.
Adam Spiers writes:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Adam Spiers writes:
>>> I just blogged about this:
>>>
>>> http://blog.adamspiers.org/2013/02/25/music-industry-learns-nothing-from-the-avid-sibelius-saga/
>>
>> Well, I see some fatally flawed assumptions here, ridi
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Adam Spiers
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Adam Spiers writes:
>>> I just blogged about this:
>>>
>>> http://blog.adamspiers.org/2013/02/25/music-industry-learns-nothing-from-the-avid-sibelius-saga/
>>
>> Well, I see some f
Hi,
I want to try to make a little video using ly2video that is playable on my
iPod classic. ly2video.py has several parameters to control the video
output format (--fps, --quality, --resolution, --width, --height, and I
guess the extension/filetype of the output file is also important?)
Bu
SoundsFromSound writes:
> Just incredible. This LilyPond community is simply untouchable -
> /unmatched /anywhere else on the web, in my experience.
LaTeX community (the plain TeX community, in contrast, falls apart into
few individuals with their own style and macros and very infrequent
intera
> 1. Are "single Whole Measure Rest" and "compressed MMR" two different
> things, and treated as such, with specific rules, etc. in references
> like Ross, Read, Gould?
As far as I know, they are treated similarly. Why should there be a
difference? The idea of having compressed MMRs is to save
Xavier,
Thank you for explaining the root cause of this frustrating problem.
Based on your solution, I am now able to use the chord font of my choice by
adding the following snippet at the top of my source file (in this case
Verdana, which ships natively with Win7)
\paper {
#(define fonts
Just incredible. This LilyPond community is simply untouchable - /unmatched
/anywhere else on the web, in my experience.
Thank you all for helping me with this - LilyPond keeps blowing my mind! I
can't stop using it.
I'll tweak this code a bit and it should work out just fine for what I need,
t
> -Original Message-
> From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 6:44 PM
> To: wjm; d...@gnu.org; Lilypond-User List
> Subject: Re: Footnotes to lyrics
>
>
> wjm wrote Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:34 PM
>
> > From the NR LilyPond version 2
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Adam Spiers writes:
>> I just blogged about this:
>>
>> http://blog.adamspiers.org/2013/02/25/music-industry-learns-nothing-from-the-avid-sibelius-saga/
>
> Well, I see some fatally flawed assumptions here, riding on your notion
> "both Muse
2013/2/28 Xavier Scheuer :
> I sometimes wanted different horizontal space settings for "single Whole
> Measure Rest" and "real" multimeasure rests a.k.a "compressed MMR"
> (with a number above).
Hi again.
BTW, you could print the MultiMeasureRestNumber on a "single Whole
Measure Rest", too:
{
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM, SoundsFromSound
wrote:
> Nathan:
>
> Wow, that comes out amazingly in LilyPond when I render it - how did you
> know how to do all that? Damn, I wish I could be that savvy :)
>
> It's not *essential* that the line be centered, I was just trying to make
> this as "n
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:56:45PM +0100, Janek Warcho?? wrote:
>
> Yes, it's a nice example and i wouldn't hesitate to post it in that
> discussion. I don't see it there; would you like me to post it?
Thanks for your kind comments.
Yes, you may post it if you like. Word the post yourself of
c
2013/2/28 Xavier Scheuer :
> On 27 February 2013 18:13, wrote:
>>
>> Comment #1 on issue 3208 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Wrong
>> MultiMeasureRest glyph
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3208
>>
>> OK - let's just be clear about what the bug is. Lilypond does the right
>>
wjm wrote Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:34 PM
> From the NR LilyPond version 2.17.13
> +++
> Known issues and warnings
>
> Footnotes cannot be attached to MultiMeasureRests or automatic beams or
> lyrics.
>
Yes; when I documented the footnote command I failed to find a way of
adding a fo
On 27 February 2013 20:29, mayornancy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using lilypond (2.16.2) on Windows7 SP1 in "portable" mode (I simply
> extracted the installer to a folder).
>
> After compiling the following Chord example found at:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/input/lsr/lilypond-snippets/Chords
On 27 February 2013 18:13, wrote:
>
> Comment #1 on issue 3208 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Wrong
> MultiMeasureRest glyph
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3208
>
> OK - let's just be clear about what the bug is. Lilypond does the right
> thing (TM) for single Whole Measure
Federico,
Thanks for your suggestion.
I downloaded and installed the font families from your screenshot (all 3 were
missing from my PC), but this has not solved the problem. I can reproduce the
same font problem on a second PC (running Win7 x64). Any other ideas?
Greg
Eluze:
Oh wow, you got it centered too?? You guys are too smart here :) Thank you
thank you - how exactly did you do that? Drum mode?
Eluze wrote
>
> SoundsFromSound wrote
>> Good afternoon everyone,
>>
>> I was attempting to engrave this piece today and I've hit a bit of a
>> roadblock.
>>
Nathan:
Wow, that comes out amazingly in LilyPond when I render it - how did you
know how to do all that? Damn, I wish I could be that savvy :)
It's not *essential* that the line be centered, I was just trying to make
this as "neat" on the eyes as possible - it's absolutely FINE if it must
stay u
Thanks to both of your for the brainstorming! I really appreciate you taking
the time to help me.
Yes, I will most certainly share my findings with you all once I figure it
all out! :)
I'll trying both those suggestions now, I'll post how it goes asap.
Ben
Eluze wrote
>
> SoundsFromSound wro
On 27 February 2013 19:37, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Helge,
>
> Your problem is very similar to one that I will face [again] soon:
> I will be engraving a choir piece of mine in which there are S+A+T+B
> sections, SA+TB sections, and SATB ("choral unison") sections.
>
> During that process, I'm
2013/2/20 Thomas Morley :
> 2013/2/19 Trevor Daniels :
>>
>> Thomas Morley wrote Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:29 PM
>>
>>> There were some similiar requests in the past, perhaps I should write
>>> a LSR-snippet or is it worth to be included in the source-docs?
>>
>> An LSR snippet would be great.
>
[Lilypond v2.17.13]
Hello all!
Is there a way to guarantee that the space between two contexts cannot be
compressed beyond #'minimum-distance?
I have a book where there's still compressible space between socres, and
between staves within those scores, but I don't want my ScoreMarks context
(
SoundsFromSound wrote
> Good afternoon everyone,
>
> I was attempting to engrave this piece today and I've hit a bit of a
> roadblock.
>
> Essentially what I'm supposed to do is have the piano break away from it's
> "normal" grand staff for many measures (15+).
>
> Then change to a percussio
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>> No idea... I just begun to use the last realease of frescobaldi under
>> [a freedom-limiting operating system] and this is just fantastic.
[..]
> Could you please be more aware and more careful about advocating the use
> of non-free operating systems?
I have read th
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:47 PM, SoundsFromSound wrote:
> Good afternoon everyone,
>
> I was attempting to engrave this piece today and I've hit a bit of a
> roadblock.
>
> Essentially what I'm supposed to do is have the piano break away from it's
> "normal" grand staff for many measures (15+).
Il 27/02/2013 20:29, mayornancy ha scritto:
After compiling the following Chord example found at:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/input/lsr/lilypond-snippets/Chords#Single-staff-template-with-notes-and-chords
my result PDF chord symbols are using a very different font than the
example output show
Good afternoon everyone,
I was attempting to engrave this piece today and I've hit a bit of a
roadblock.
Essentially what I'm supposed to do is have the piano break away from it's
"normal" grand staff for many measures (15+).
Then change to a percussion 1-line staff to notate the various per
Greetings,
From the NR LilyPond version 2.17.13
+++
Known issues and warnings
Multiple footnotes for the same page can only be stacked, one above the
other; they cannot be printed on the same line.
Footnotes cannot be attached to MultiMeasureRests or automatic beams or
lyrics.
Footnote
Hi Helge,
Your problem is very similar to one that I will face [again] soon: I will be
engraving a choir piece of mine in which there are S+A+T+B sections, SA+TB
sections, and SATB ("choral unison") sections.
During that process, I'm hoping to perfect the methods available in Lilypond to
handl
- Original Message -
From: "Helge Kruse"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:43 PM
Subject: removing identical staves
I there, I am typesetting a piece for a small orchestra. There ares voice
for the violas and cellos too. These violas play unisono for the first five
pages. The
I there, I am typesetting a piece for a small orchestra. There ares
voice for the violas and cellos too. These violas play unisono for the
first five pages. Then suddenly they play very different voices. I am
reluctant to add a Viola I staff and a viola II staff to the whole
score. The composer
Daniel Rosen writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:03 AM
>> To: Daniel Rosen
>> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Footnotes to lyrics
>>
>> Phooey. I assume that "Lyric" was supposed to be the text of t
> -Original Message-
> From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:03 AM
> To: Daniel Rosen
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Footnotes to lyrics
>
> Phooey. I assume that "Lyric" was supposed to be the text of the lyrics,
> right?
Correct.
Kieren MacMillan writes:
>> I suggest rereading the thread in context, taking note about who
>> wrote what, and then checking your summary to be accurate, fair and
>> matched in style to all those contributing to the thread that have
>> ventured an opinion differing from yours.
>
> Done. And it d
> I suggest rereading the thread in context, taking note about who wrote
> what, and then checking your summary to be accurate, fair and matched in
> style to all those contributing to the thread that have ventured an
> opinion differing from yours.
Done. And it didn't change my opinion that some
Daniel Rosen writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:24 AM
>> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Footnotes to lyrics
>>
>> Conversion to 2.17.13 (what I have here) leaves this unchanged. The error
>> messa
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Jim Long wrote:
> Thanks for this tip, and also to Xavier for mentioning
> \partcombine. It simplified the code nicely.
>
> I modified the combined trombone score to show all four parts
> on one staff.
>
> The code looks much cleaner now.
Yes, it's a nice ex
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> David,
>
>> "tolerant" is not the same as "stanceless".
>
> Agreed. And "taking a stance" is not the same as "driving potential
> users away with your senseless bigotry, and bothering existing users
> with your poor communication skills".
> But that is all semantics.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:24 AM
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Footnotes to lyrics
>
> Conversion to 2.17.13 (what I have here) leaves this unchanged. The error
> message is a different one, though.
David,
> "tolerant" is not the same as "stanceless".
Agreed. And "taking a stance" is not the same as "driving potential users away
with your senseless bigotry, and bothering existing users with your poor
communication skills".
But that is all semantics.
> Forbidding people to discuss what tha
James,
> If we must spend energy on advocacy, let's work on gaining wider use of
> Lilypond in the music business.
Precisely.
Thank you for injecting some sense-ful commentary in an increasingly sense-less
thread.
Best,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mail
Han-Wen Nienhuys gmail.com> writes:
> Our mission has always been to provide excellent music notation in a
> free software package to as many people as possible, including those
> using windows and macs. We have no business doing ideological
> advocacy, and frankly, the original message that star
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> David,
>
>> Then it would seem that many of us have forgotten
>> what brought LilyPond to them in the first place.
>
> No — some of us just have a sense of balance and tolerance.
Sounds to me like the "fair is foul and foul is fair" idea of balance
and tolerance pervad
Am 27.02.2013 12:45, schrieb David Kastrup:
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
Hi Kieren, hi David K.,
applyContext is good for doing somethind conditionally anywhere in the
music stream:
cond = ##t
mod = \with { \override NoteHead #'color = #red }
\relative c' {
c4 e g b \applyContext #(lambda (con
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Hi Kieren, hi David K.,
>
> applyContext is good for doing somethind conditionally anywhere in the
> music stream:
>
> cond = ##t
>
> mod = \with { \override NoteHead #'color = #red }
>
> \relative c' {
>
> c4 e g b \applyContext #(lambda (context) (if cond
> (ly:context
Hi Kieren, hi David K.,
applyContext is good for doing somethind conditionally anywhere in the
music stream:
cond = ##t
mod = \with { \override NoteHead #'color = #red }
\relative c' {
c4 e g b \applyContext #(lambda (context) (if cond
(ly:context-mod-apply! context mod))) c a f d c1
}
On 02/27/2013 11:41 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
I am and have been ambivalent about being part of the GNU project. It
has come with a lot of harping about how we should say things (like
insisting on naming Linux as "GNU/Linux"), with little in return.
At the risk of opening up a can of worms,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:21 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Those who don't care will not actively help Free Software including
>>> LilyPond, so it is in LilyPond's best interest to make them care. Which
>>> is not necessarily the same as annoying them. But it is also not the
>>> same as hiding un
Daniel Rosen writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:24 PM
>> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Footnotes to lyrics
>>
>> Daniel Rosen writes:
>>
>> > At
>> > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentatio
51 matches
Mail list logo
