Keehun Nam wrote
> I need to align "poco sf" where the sf aligns with the note head. Right
> now, the note head is aligned with the left of the poco.
try
\override DynamicText #'self-alignment-X = #right
does it do what you want?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069
Dear LilyPond users,
I know this is a novice question and I've tried what the document says to
try but I don't thin its examples relate exactly to this situation although
I'm sure it's been beaten into a pulp in previous discussions.
I need to align "poco sf" where the sf aligns with the note hea
2012/10/24 Janek Warchoł :
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:38 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Janek Warchoł writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
That's entirely selfish since I know you are reading the list. I write
four answers, and you turn them into twenty.
2012/10/25 Nick Payne :
> In the following, how can I get the hairpin above the textual
> indication? Playing around with outside-staff-priority doesn't change
> the order, presumably because they don't start at the same instant.
>
> \version "2.17.5"
>
> mpDolceEtc = \markup { mp \normal-text\ital
In the following, how can I get the hairpin above the textual
indication? Playing around with outside-staff-priority doesn't change
the order, presumably because they don't start at the same instant.
\version "2.17.5"
mpDolceEtc = \markup { mp \normal-text\italic { dolce ad espressivo } }
mpDolce
On 16/10/12 09:50, Nick Payne wrote:
> Going to the manual page for 2.16 ( http://lilypond.org/manuals.html)
> and entering a search term (eg I tried "footnote") in the search box
> at upper right returns hits in the 2.17 manuals. The search presented
> to Google is:
>
> site:lilypond.org/doc/v2.17
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:16 PM, wrote:
> Hello
>
> using version 2.14.1 [...]
please try latest stable version (2.16.0).
best,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> > > using version 2.14.1 this is only place I can put the remove
> > > bar_number that will allow the piece to compile however I still have bar
> > > numbers. So what am I doing wrong?
> > >
> > > score {
> > > new Staff melody
> > > layout
> > > {
> > > context {
> > > Staff
> > > remove "Time_s
David,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Tim Roberts writes:
>
>> MING TSANG wrote:
>>
>>
>> This is my third post on the same subject. First time on Oct 14,
>> Second time on Oct 19. In the past, I get reply on the same day,
>> and sometime 2 to 3 day later. I
Hi, lily user community:
I apologize if my email to the community offended anyone. I am truly sorry. I
understand all of you are volunteer and I also understood you all felt
satisfaction when one of the user is help.
Thank you for what all of you have done in the past and I am sure the help for
That made things worse now I have all the time signatures and bar lines and
bar numbers - IF it compiles which it didn't if I just used your suggestion.
Sorry.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Toine Schreurs wrote:
> > using version 2.14.1 this is only place I can put the remove
> > bar_number t
> using version 2.14.1 this is only place I can put the remove
> bar_number that will allow the piece to compile however I still have bar
> numbers. So what am I doing wrong?
>
> score {
> new Staff melody
> layout
> {
> context {
> Staff
> remove "Time_signature_engraver"
> remove
> "Bar_engrave
Hello
using version 2.14.1 this is only place I can put the remove
bar_number that will allow the piece to compile however I still have bar
numbers. So what am I doing wrong?
score {
new Staff melody
layout
{
context {
Staff
remove "Time_signature_engraver"
remove
"Bar_engraver"
remove "Bar_
Am 24.10.2012 00:26, schrieb Thomas Morley:
I'm not completely sure what you want to achieve,
I have the notes in the PDF version that I referred in my original mail.
These are scans of a older edition with a poor readability. Especially
some chords are hard to read, e.g. at page 7 are acciden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/24/2012 12:06 PM, MING TSANG wrote:
> I am seeking to print number beneath the note. Refer to the png.
> On Key C seems correct on "AA" "BB". On Key G only "AA" is correct
> and "BB" is wrong On Key E-flat, again "AA" is correct, and "BB" is
>
>> You subscribe to the list, right? Then you should be able to see
>> that the message went through. A lack of response usually means no
>> one had an immediately obvious answer.
>
> Or that people are just not in the mood to continue dealing with
> large dumps of unstructured and unedited top-p
Tim Roberts writes:
> MING TSANG wrote:
>
>
> This is my third post on the same subject. First time on Oct 14,
> Second time on Oct 19. In the past, I get reply on the same day,
> and sometime 2 to 3 day later. I don't know what happpen.
>
> Appreciate someone acknowled
MING TSANG wrote:
>
> This is my third post on the same subject. First time on Oct 14,
> Second time on Oct 19. In the past, I get reply on the same day, and
> sometime 2 to 3 day later. I don't know what happpen.
>
> Appreciate someone acknowledge receipt of the post. Even better tell
> me is
Thank you Phil, but the same issue persists when using the macro.
Gagi
On 24 October 2012 16:15, Phil Holmes wrote:
> **
> Try this:
>
> diamond = \override NoteHead #'style = #'diamond
>
> \relative c' {
> <<
>\new Voice {\voiceOne d2~\( d8[es] as16[f g8]\) }
>\new Voice {\voiceTwo \di
Hi, lily user community
This is my third post on the same subject. First time on Oct 14, Second time on
Oct 19. In the past, I get reply on the same day, and sometime 2 to 3 day
later. I don't know what happpen.
Appreciate someone acknowledge receipt of the post. Even better tell me is
ther
Hello,
On 3 October 2012 07:54, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, James wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Just an FYI, I was able to download install and run LP's test file
>> with no problems, on Windows 8.x (Enterprise Edition), I am not sure
>> if that is really significant vs Stand
Try this:
diamond = \override NoteHead #'style = #'diamond
\relative c' {
<<
\new Voice {\voiceOne d2~\( d8[es] as16[f g8]\) }
\new Voice {\voiceTwo \diamond d2~ d2 }
>> \oneVoice
}
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Gagi Petrovic
To: Marc Hohl
Cc: lilypond-
example of code *with* macro (here both voices somehow get diamond heads):
\version "2.14.2"
diamond = \override NoteHead #'style = #'diamond
\relative c' {
<<
\voiceOne { d2~\( d8[es] as16[f g8]\) }
\new Voice {\voiceTwo \diamond d2~ d2 }
>> \oneVoice
}
example of code *without* macro (thi
Hi,
I recently typeset a piece for the LyBoek project, where the music is
repeated, and the words are different the second time.
I had to dig deeply into the manual to arrive at this:
\new Lyrics \with {
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-affinity = #CENTER
} \lyricsto "sopraan" {
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:38 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> That's entirely selfish since I know you are reading the list. I write
>>> four answers, and you turn them into twenty.
>>
>> I'm not sure i understand.
>> That's entirely selfish since I know you are reading the list. I
>> write four answers, and you turn them into twenty.
>
> I'm not sure i understand. You are saying that Harm is selfish or
> that you are selfish? Anyway, i have a hard time deciding whether
> this is a compliment, or somethin
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>> Let me take the opportunity to express my deepest gratefulness for all
>>> your work, not only for developing LilyPond, but for all the time you
>>> spend on the user-list, answering/solvi
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Thomas Morley writes:
>> Let me take the opportunity to express my deepest gratefulness for all
>> your work, not only for developing LilyPond, but for all the time you
>> spend on the user-list, answering/solving all kind of
>> questions/pr
28 matches
Mail list logo
