Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> writes: >>> Let me take the opportunity to express my deepest gratefulness for all >>> your work, not only for developing LilyPond, but for all the time you >>> spend on the user-list, answering/solving all kind of >>> questions/problems. >> >> That's entirely selfish since I know you are reading the list. I write >> four answers, and you turn them into twenty. > > I'm not sure i understand. You are saying that Harm is selfish or > that you are selfish?
I am selfish by enabling Harm to do work that I would have to myself otherwise. I thought that was rather obvious. > Anyway, i have a hard time deciding whether this is a compliment, or > something, err, opposite. Interesting. I had no problem interpreting Harm's message as a compliment to me. And if I state that he does quite more of the same he is complimenting me for, it becomes something opposite? I guess I am too much of a mathematician to understand this. Yes, I know about wraparound arithmetic, but I would not know how to apply it here. > Probably i'm overly cautious wrt/ emails and their meanings... Depends on how many others misunderstood this. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
