Re: New here and first question about using repeat percent over more than two measures

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:40:48PM +, James Lowe wrote : > Hello, > > )-Original Message- > )From: Aurelien [mailto:tyran...@free.fr] > )Sent: 15 March 2011 07:54 > )To: James Lowe > )Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > )Subject: Re: New here and first question about using repeat percent over

Re: Changing subscription --- how?

Hello, Here's the web page you need: http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Just follow the instructions towards the bottom of that page: "To unsubscribe from lilypond-user, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options enter your subscription email address:" Enter

Re: RemoveEmptyStaffContext should keep at least one staff alive?

Ah, I see. The snippet you mention will certainly do what you need, as you can "turn off" the staff removal for those four bars, in that staff only. Good luck! Andrew On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Paul Scott wrote: > On 03/14/2011 09:00 PM, Andrew Ha

Re: Dot-notehead collision

On 16/03/11 08:59, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: On Mar 15, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" To:; "lilypond-user" Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 6:24 PM Subject: Re: Dot-notehead collision m...@apollinemike.com wrote Tuesday, March 15, 20

Changing subscription --- how?

Hi, I'd like to change the subscription of this ML to receive just a digest but not successful yet where to go. Any suggestion will be welcome on how to change the subscription. Thanks in adavance; -- Koichi Suzuki ___ lilypond-user mailing l

Re: filename in markup

On Mar 15, 2011, at 1:21 PM, -Eluze wrote: > > > m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> >> >> One issue with this solution is that if you do batch processing from the >> command line: >> >> lilypond foo.ly bar.ly >> >> Then the solution no longer works. Is there a more secure way to get the >> cor

Re: Dot-notehead collision

- Original Message - From: Perhaps a stupid question - in traditional engraving, is there ever an instance where, in 2 voice polyphony, the note column w/ a downward pointing stem is placed to the right of note column with an upward pointing stem? I hacked a solution that does this an

Re: Dot-notehead collision

m...@apollinemike.com wrote Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:59 PM Perhaps a stupid question - in traditional engraving, is there ever an instance where, in 2 voice > polyphony, the note column w/ a downward pointing stem is placed to the right of note column with > an upward pointing stem? I hack

Re: Dot-notehead collision

2011/3/15 m...@apollinemike.com : > Perhaps a stupid question - in traditional engraving, > is there ever an instance where, in 2 voice polyphony, > the note column w/ a downward pointing stem is placed > to the right of note column with an upward pointing stem? > I hacked a solution that does this

Re: Dot-notehead collision

On 3/15/11 2:59 PM, "m...@apollinemike.com" wrote: > On Mar 15, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> - Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" >> To: ; "lilypond-user" >> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 6:24 PM >> Subject: Re: Dot-notehead collision >> >> >>> >>> m...@apolli

Re: Dot-notehead collision

On Mar 15, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" > To: ; "lilypond-user" > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 6:24 PM > Subject: Re: Dot-notehead collision > > >> >> m...@apollinemike.com wrote Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:00 PM >> >>> \relative c

Re: How to print to \score { } constructs next to each other instead of underneath

2011/3/14 James Lowe > I appreciate that. > > That has suddenly opened up a lot of other possibilities (once I discovered > that \textLengthOn works with this construct) and may just have just solved > another problem I had completely forgotten about. Glad that helped! Good luck, Janek ___

Re: Dot-notehead collision

- Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" To: ; "lilypond-user" Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 6:24 PM Subject: Re: Dot-notehead collision m...@apollinemike.com wrote Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:00 PM \relative c' { \time 3/4 << { 4 2 } \\ { d2. } >> } Produces the attached output

Re: Piano score and kneed beams

- Original Message - From: "Peter O'Doherty" Cc: "lilypond-user" Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 8:14 PM Subject: Re: Piano score and kneed beams Thanks James and Phil. The examples you give are not quite what I'm looking for (at least I can't tweak them to get what I need). The close

Re: Piano score and kneed beams

Thanks James and Phil. The examples you give are not quite what I'm looking for (at least I can't tweak them to get what I need). The closest is a simple \change Staff command but this only allows notes on one stave at a time. This (http://www.peterodoherty.net/screenshot.png) is what I would

RE: Piano score and kneed beams

Peter, )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of Peter O'Doherty )Sent: 15 March 2011 18:19 )To: lilypond-user )Subject: Piano score and kneed beams ) )Hi, )Can someone plea

Re: Piano score and kneed beams

- Original Message - From: "Peter O'Doherty" To: "lilypond-user" Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 6:19 PM Subject: Piano score and kneed beams Hi, Can someone please point me in the direction of info on "kneed beams" in piano scores. The only snippet I can find is this http://lsr.dsi.

Re: Dot-notehead collision

m...@apollinemike.com wrote Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:00 PM \relative c' { \time 3/4 << { 4 2 } \\ { d2. } >> } Produces the attached output. Is there a way to get it so that the dot does not collide with the notehead (w/o resorting to extra offsets and the like)? I don't think so.

Re: Removing accidentals from a voice

> 2 voices, set voiceOne/voiceTwo Phil, When using separate voices, I've used: accN = { \once \override Voice.Accidental #'stencil = ##f \once \override Voice.Accidental #'X-extent = #'(0 . 0) } Then, in whatever voice needs an invisible accidental, it would be: \accN cs4 I've n

Piano score and kneed beams

Hi, Can someone please point me in the direction of info on "kneed beams" in piano scores. The only snippet I can find is this http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646 and it deals with tweaking tuplet numbers in conjunction with kneed beams. I just need to know how to create kneed beams (inclu

Re: what about simplifying music notation?

Marc Weber wrote: Wouldn't it be easier to assign notes (c,d,e,..) natural numbers? then define could be: ---O- nr 16 ---O- nr 12 ---O- nr 8 ---O- nr 4 ---O- nr 0 to be always 4 semitones? Hi Marc, If you still want to experiment with this kind of alternative notation in LilyPond, here are

Re: filename in markup

m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > > > One issue with this solution is that if you do batch processing from the > command line: > > lilypond foo.ly bar.ly > > Then the solution no longer works. Is there a more secure way to get the > correct file name? > this works perfectly for me (windows vi

Dot-notehead collision

Hey all, \relative c' { \time 3/4 << { 4 2 } \\ { d2. } >> } Produces the attached output. Is there a way to get it so that the dot does not collide with the notehead (w/o resorting to extra offsets and the like)? Cheers, MS <>___ lilypond-user mail

RE: Removing accidentals from a voice

Hello, )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of Phil Holmes )Sent: 15 March 2011 16:10 )To: Kieren MacMillan )Cc: LilyPond User Group )Subject: Re: Removing accidentals fro

Re: Removing accidentals from a voice

- Original Message - From: "Kieren MacMillan" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "LilyPond User Group" Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:46 PM Subject: Re: Removing accidentals from a voice Hi Phil, What about \override Voice.Accidental #'stencil = ##f or \override Voice.Accidental #'transparent

Re: Removing accidentals from a voice

Hi Quite difficult without a snippet, but you could try, within your second voice : \override Accidental #'stencil = ##f Regards JMarc Phil Holmes a écrit : I have a score with lyrics that have slightly different rhythms for each verse. The way it's set in the original is to have full-size

Re: Removing accidentals from a voice

Hi Phil, What about \override Voice.Accidental #'stencil = ##f or \override Voice.Accidental #'transparent = ##t ?? Hope this helps, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Removing accidentals from a voice

On Tue 15 Mar 2011, 15:36 Phil Holmes wrote: > in-key note, since this would then play wrong. It looks to me like > the accidental engraver is in the staff context. Is there any way > to remove the staff engraver for just one voice of a staff? I guess, you can move it to Voice? Remove from Staff

Removing accidentals from a voice

I have a score with lyrics that have slightly different rhythms for each verse. The way it's set in the original is to have full-size stem-up notes for the first verse, and small stem-down notes for the alternative. So far, so good - 2 voices, set voiceOne/voiceTwo, use \teeny to get small not

Re: The Gigsaw has a problem with midi output

- Original Message - From: "Phil Hézaine" Thanks for the quick answer. Is there a list of the changes I could read. I'll like to go on to do something about my little "app". Phil. There's been considerable discussion on the .devel mailing list. -- Phil Holmes __

RE: New here and first question about using repeat percent over more than two measures

Hello, )-Original Message- )From: Aurelien [mailto:tyran...@free.fr] )Sent: 15 March 2011 07:54 )To: James Lowe )Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org )Subject: Re: New here and first question about using repeat percent over )more than two measures ) ) )No, I really want to use %. Or at least, I'd lik

Re: The Gigsaw has a problem with midi output

Le 15/03/2011 13:12, Phil Holmes a écrit : > - Original Message - From: "Phil Hézaine" > > To: "lilypond-user" > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 12:02 PM > Subject: The Gigsaw has a problem with midi output > > >> Hi, >> >> Lilypond version 2.13.51. >> Could somebody confirms the Lily's m

Re: The Gigsaw has a problem with midi output

- Original Message - From: "Phil Hézaine" To: "lilypond-user" Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 12:02 PM Subject: The Gigsaw has a problem with midi output Hi, Lilypond version 2.13.51. Could somebody confirms the Lily's midi output has changed. When i read an ascii file of the midi out

The Gigsaw has a problem with midi output

Hi, Lilypond version 2.13.51. Could somebody confirms the Lily's midi output has changed. When i read an ascii file of the midi output I see a note Off no longer exists. It is replaced by a note On with vol=0. I can read it from midicomp. Is there a reason why this output is changed? Or is it an u

Re: Combining different measures

James Lowe schrieb: > )-Original Message- > )From: Hannes Kuhnert > )I’ve got a piece with multiple measures like > ). > ) > )I’d like to have both time signatures engraved at the beginning of the > )piece. > )Additionally some kind

Re: filename in markup

On Mar 11, 2011, at 10:57 AM, MING TSANG wrote: > Thank you. > > Additional question: Can the path of the file name be printed also? > > > From: Marek Klein > To: MING TSANG > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Sent: Fri, March 11, 2011 10:19:01 AM > Subject: Re: filename in markup > > 2011/3/11 M

Re: Bach B Minor Mass

On 03/15/2011 08:19 AM, Craig Bakalian wrote: Hi, On the Petrucci Free Music web site there appears to be on the Bach B Minor Mass page, a Lilypond setting of the Mass. http://imslp.org/wiki/Mass_in_B_minor,_BWV_232_%28Bach,_Johann_Sebastian %29#Full_Scores Does anyone know who did this work?

Re: [OT] Vivi, the Virtual Violinist, plays LilyPond music

Shane Brandes writes: >As a random aside on the whole electronic music effort. On the > one hand the technology and science is very interesting, but on the > other it is somehow disturbing. I suppose since I have spent so much > of my life attempting to master keyboard instruments and hav

Re: Bach B Minor Mass

2011/3/15 Craig Bakalian : > Hi, > > On the Petrucci Free Music web site there appears to be on the Bach B > Minor Mass page, a Lilypond setting of the Mass. > > http://imslp.org/wiki/Mass_in_B_minor,_BWV_232_%28Bach,_Johann_Sebastian > %29#Full_Scores Here http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-use

Re: New here and first question about using repeat percent over more than two measures

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 08:54:15AM +, James Lowe wrote : > Aurelien > > From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org > [lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Aurelien > [tyran...@free.fr] > Sent: 22 February

Re: what about simplifying music notation?

* Marc Weber [2011-03-14 17:19]: Excerpts from David Kastrup's message of Mon Mar 14 16:58:39 + 2011: You'll find that at the end of the day, they sit down at a keyboard rather than just letting intervals play by numbers in their head. *g*. I agree. The goal in all cases is: read a strea

Re: what about simplifying music notation?

Marc Weber writes: >> David Kastrup > I'm lacking knowldege here. All I know is that in simple orchestras > are using electronic tuners here. So they don't care about whether a > note is 2 cents higher or not. Trust me, a violinist cares whether he has tuned reasonably pure fifths or not. He'll

Re: Removing Time Signature entirely (not just transparent)

Am 14.03.2011 20:40, schrieb cte...@wesleyan.edu: Hi Marc, Ahh yes, the custom clef. I have been having some fun with that. I am copying some handwritten music and I'm trying to retain the character of the music as much as possible. The clef is a design of someone else's so I won't include how t

Bach B Minor Mass

Hi, On the Petrucci Free Music web site there appears to be on the Bach B Minor Mass page, a Lilypond setting of the Mass. http://imslp.org/wiki/Mass_in_B_minor,_BWV_232_%28Bach,_Johann_Sebastian %29#Full_Scores Does anyone know who did this work? The pdf file is attributed to the following w