On 11.11.2009, at 01:01, Erik Appeldoorn wrote:
As several users have responded asking for feedback why I stopped with
lilypond (or criticism). Here's my 2cents worth.
During the last four weeks I have been restoring a piece. It has
come to me
in several different parts. Handwriting, several
hello,
http://old.nabble.com/file/p26295691/1.jpg
now i can write single bow marks:
a^\markup {\musicglyph #"scripts.upbow"}
a^\markup {\rotate #180 \musicglyph #"scripts.upbow"}
and series:
a^\markup {\musicglyph #"scripts.upbow" \rotate #180 \musicglyph
#"scripts.upbow"}
but when each note h
To use vim there is nothing to set up -- you just start typing in vim,
save the file, and process it. But you might be referring to setting
up syntax highlighting, which is actually not a necessary part of the
process, but may be helpful.
If all you want to do is use vim, then you just start usin
As several users have responded asking for feedback why I stopped with
lilypond (or criticism). Here's my 2cents worth.
During the last four weeks I have been restoring a piece. It has come to me
in several different parts. Handwriting, several voices just as extraction
parts. The publisher asked
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Erik Appeldoorn wrote:
> I’ve been around for a short while only. A month with lilypond and 3 weeks
> on the list. Made a couple of scores, quite complex ones. But for each and
> every one I had to fiddle for hours and hours trying to grab all the
> details. All t
Hi Again evrey body, I'm happy to say that with because of the help you gave me
I was not only able to get jedit up and running for lilypond but was
encouraged to succede in setting up emacs too!
Vim though is somthing else.
I looked at the directions on the lilypond site for setting it up but,
Seems like a month is too short a time before giving up. I really have no
other experience with other software like Finale or Sibelius, so I can't say
anythign about them, but I have been very pleased with what I can do with LP.
But it did take about 6 months before I was really getting it (n
Sibelius is a really great software. It is not free, can't be run from a
wiki, but great, it even handles collisions pretty well.
Still I think it is worth spending time with LilyPond, it took me far
more than 1 month on the list, so congratulations, that you could create
complex scores after th
On 10.11.2009, at 20:36, Erik Appeldoorn wrote:
I’ve been around for a short while only. A month with lilypond and
3 weeks on the list. Made a couple of scores, quite complex ones.
But for each and every one I had to fiddle for hours and hours
trying to grab all the details. All the while
> Could you prepare a patch adding the known behavior and this workaround to
> the Known Issues in Displaying pitches in pitches.itely?
OK, I will do that.
Frédéric
---
Frédéric Bron (frederic.b...@m4x.org)
Villa des Quatre Chemins, Centre
I've been around for a short while only. A month with lilypond and 3 weeks
on the list. Made a couple of scores, quite complex ones. But for each and
every one I had to fiddle for hours and hours trying to grab all the
details. All the while I had Sibelius at the ready and whenever I did
fallback f
Dear Frogs (or anybody else interested),
Could someone volunteer to create a patch to the documentation by adding
this to the Known issues and warnings section of Unmetered music in
rhythms.itely?
Thanks,
Carl
On 11/10/09 7:46 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote:
> It seems that you have to explicit
Frederic,
Thanks for the info.
On 11/10/09 11:55 AM, "Frédéric Bron" wrote:
>>> BTW, I have found a strange behaviour of "modern" accidentals rule:
>>> LilyPond considers volta alternatives as "previous" measure. Is this
>>> correct? (Note the natural sign at the 2nd and 3rd alternatives, not
>> BTW, I have found a strange behaviour of "modern" accidentals rule:
>> LilyPond considers volta alternatives as "previous" measure. Is this
>> correct? (Note the natural sign at the 2nd and 3rd alternatives, not
>> related to the previous _played_ measure.)
Yes, this is known behaviour. Here is
Stupid of me - ignore this - sorry for the noise :(
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Mats Bengtsson" ; "Stefan Thomas"
Cc: "lilypond-user"
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: temporary staff for divisi
Mats Bengtsson wrote Tuesday, Novemb
Mats Bengtsson wrote Tuesday, November 10, 2009 5:40 PM
I answer this email for the record.
It seems that there's an attempt to explain this better in the
2.13 manual than in the 2.12 manual, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/Context-layout-order#Context-layout-order
Am Dienstag, 10. November 2009 16:21:34 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> Nick Payne wrote:
> > I have created a PDF portfolio of the the 2.13.7 English PDF
> > documentation (the portfolio has an embedded index that enables
> > searching across all the manuals at once). It can be downloaded from
> > http:
I answer this email for the record.
It seems that there's an attempt to explain this better in the 2.13
manual than in the 2.12 manual, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/Context-layout-order#Context-layout-order
and
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/A
Hi Stefan,
But how can I get Angular brackets for the two first violins?
Not sure what you mean by the question? Please clarify.
Regards,
Kieren.
p.s. I found your original code very difficult to read/diagnose,
because of the mixing of content with presentation, indent
inconsistencies, e
Yes, now I've got what I wanted!
2009/11/10 Mats Bengtsson
> I was just about to formulate an answer to your initial question, but it
> turns out that you have figured it out partially yourself. The reason that
> your latest example looks a bit weird is that a GrandStaff cannot contain a
> Choir
I was just about to formulate an answer to your initial question, but it
turns out that you have figured it out partially yourself. The reason
that your latest example looks a bit weird is that a GrandStaff cannot
contain a ChoirStaff (unless you modify the definition of GrandStaff).
If you ins
On 10.11.2009, at 17:04, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
[Mac OS X 10.4.11, Lilypond 2.13.7]
Hi all,
When I run
lilypond -dshow-available-fonts blabla
I get
dyld: Library not loaded: @executable_path/../lib//
libpangoft2-1.0.0.dylib
Referenced from: /Applications/Lilypond/development/LilyPo
Dear community,
I've got a little bit more knowledge. I found out that I can place a staff
exactly with alignAboveContext
But how can I get Angular brackets for the two first violins?
\version "2.12.2"
violineA = \context Staff ="ViolineA"
{ \set Staff.instrumentName = "Violine 1"
\set Staff.s
Dear community,
I have a question, cocerning divisi (for strings).
Why is so order of the staves so stange?
Here is my snippet, excuse, please, the childish musical example:
\version "2.12.2"
violineA = \new Staff { \set Staff.instrumentName = "Violine 1" \set
Staff.shortInstrumentName="Vln. 1"
David Sumbler wrote:
I thought that using the slashSeparator between items
would make things clearer, but I only want it
after each complete item, not after every line.
It sounds as though each of your exercises is a \score block.
You can put (stand-alone) markup between these blocks; see
[Mac OS X 10.4.11, Lilypond 2.13.7]
Hi all,
When I run
lilypond -dshow-available-fonts blabla
I get
dyld: Library not loaded: @executable_path/../lib//
libpangoft2-1.0.0.dylib
Referenced from: /Applications/Lilypond/development/LilyPond.app/
Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond
Reason: I
Nick Payne wrote:
I have created a PDF portfolio of the the 2.13.7 English PDF
documentation (the portfolio has an embedded index that enables
searching across all the manuals at once). It can be downloaded from
http://www.users.on.net/~njpayne/music/lilydoc.pdf.
Nick
Thanks Nick!
Before
2009/11/10 chip :
> I don't understand why a \cadenza section, a completely free-form unmetered
> cadenza, is causing problems with the other parts. My piece is made up of 7
> instrument parts. I've added the entire piece at the bottom of this message.
> (Oh, btw, there are no forced bar checks any
It seems that you have to explicitly create a Voice context when you
start a piece with \cadenzaOn:
\include "english.ly"
\new Voice \relative c'{
\cadenzaOn
c16^"Solo Free Time" d ef f g2. as4 gs g32 gs g8~ g1 g4 f16 ef d f d
ef c4 ef8 c16 d g,1 \bar "" c16 d ef f g2 g \glissando g' g16
Op dinsdag 10-11-2009 om 01:45 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Patrick
McCarty:
> On 2009-11-10, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Op dinsdag 10-11-2009 om 00:51 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Patrick
> > McCarty:
> > > On 2009-11-09, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nick Payn
Thankyou for the reply - why is it that when I remove the " c1 | " from
the beginning and end of your corrected example I then get bar lines
throughout the cadenza? I don't want those c1's, they're not part of the
piece. Do I have to do some override to make the bar lines invisible?
Isn't that
On 2009-11-10, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 10-11-2009 om 00:51 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Patrick
> McCarty:
> > On 2009-11-09, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nick Payne
> > > wrote:
> > > > Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what to do here. Bu
chip wrote:
why would a
\cadenzaOn
c16^"Solo Free Time" d ef f g2. as4 gs g32 gs g8~ g1 g4 f16 ef d f
d ef c4 ef8 c16 d g,1 \bar "" c16 d ef f g2 g \glissando g' g16 f ef d
c b a g f e d c4 b2 e b16 e b1 \bar "||"
\cadenzaOff
cause a bar check failure?
It doesn't, at least not
Op dinsdag 10-11-2009 om 00:51 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Patrick
McCarty:
> On 2009-11-09, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nick Payne
> > wrote:
> > > Patrick McCarty wrote:
> I'm not sure what to do here. But IWBN if db did not install any of
> these invalid syml
On 2009-11-09, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nick Payne
> wrote:
> > Patrick McCarty wrote:
> >>
> >> I should have said "about half" of the files. Most (if not all) of
> >> the nonexistent files are supposed to be in the "\usr\docs\"
> >> hierarchy. The directory str
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> The answer does not fit the question. The question was not about
> stacking as much on a page as possible. Quite contrary: it was about
> stacking less than possible if it avoids ugly results.
>
Indeed. Perhaps I was not specific enough. I look for a possibility to
i
36 matches
Mail list logo
