Op woensdag 12-08-2009 om 17:59 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> It's not that; Jan thought you were objecting to having:
> LilyPond is Free Software and part of the GNU project.
> on the home page.
>
> Frankly, I'm still not conviced that's a good thing to add, so
We need "fre
Gradients
These two images have the same top-level menu item selected.
Which is easier to see?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/solid.png
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gradients.png
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> I'm not certain if the question was clear, so let's do this again
> and put it to a vote.
>
> These two images have the same top-level menu item selected.
> Which is easier to see?
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/solid.png
> http://lilypond.
On Aug 12, 2009, at 6:41 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
I'm not certain if the question was clear, so let's do this again
and put it to a vote.
These two images have the same top-level menu item selected.
Which is easier to see?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/solid.png
http://lilypond.org/~graham
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 06:39:20PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Jan
> Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> >> - GNU and (new) website can be trimmed from the title.
> >
> > We do not want to trim GNU. Remember the long thread on devel,
> > where even contributors did not rea
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:51:07AM -0400, Chris Snyder wrote:
> Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> > Could we add a link in the first paragraph to the (upcoming) essay?
> > Perhaps on the words "beautifully engraved music". The essay was a
> > prominent feature of the previous web design, and says a lot abou
Hi Graham,
These two images have the same top-level menu item selected.
Which is easier to see?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/solid.png
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gradients.png
Solid.
Please DO NOT complain that brown gradients doesn't fit the color
scheme; changing the colors (either of
I'm not certain if the question was clear, so let's do this again
and put it to a vote.
These two images have the same top-level menu item selected.
Which is easier to see?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/solid.png
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gradients.png
(ok, the background to the lily icon
I understood. By searching "lilypond fingering" in Google I found the
2.9 doc page about fingering. The 2.12 doc page on this subject is
enough detailed for me (beginner point of view who managed this
evening to put fingering indications in the right place).
Thank you very much for you help.
--
Nick Payne wrote Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:59 PM
Yes, the <> construct around the note is needed. If you just have
e-4 e^4
e_4, all three fingerings will appear above the notes. You need
.
^ and _ also work with articulations and slurs and ties. It's
briefly
mentioned in s.2.2.3 of th
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 06:59:01AM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
> Yes, the <> construct around the note is needed. If you just have e-4 e^4 e_4,
> all three fingerings will appear above the notes.
Really? That's odd, apparently 2.13.2 is broken.
{
c'4^3 c_2
}
gives me a 2 below the staff.
Cheers,
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Jan
> Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>> - GNU and (new) website can be trimmed from the title.
>> We do not want to trim GNU. Remember the long thread on devel,
>> where even contributors did not realise we are GNU, or ever heard of it?
>
> Whom i
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:09:59PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>
> Is the use of _ and ^ with fingerings documented anywhere? I don't remember
> seeing this. It's certainly easier than using the chord angle brackets.
"
Fingering instructions may be manually placed above or below the
staff, see D
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Jan
Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> - GNU and (new) website can be trimmed from the title.
>
> We do not want to trim GNU. Remember the long thread on devel,
> where even contributors did not realise we are GNU, or ever heard of it?
Whom is this site for? Are we trying t
Yes, the <> construct around the note is needed. If you just have e-4 e^4
e_4, all three fingerings will appear above the notes. You need
.
^ and _ also work with articulations and slurs and ties. It's briefly
mentioned in s.2.2.3 of the LM as working for articulations and fingerings.
Ni
Op woensdag 12-08-2009 om 15:29 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
> I just pushed a couple of build and translation-infrastructure
> fixes for the new site
>
>http://lilypond.org/~janneke/lilypond.org
Now the essay.tely also works, I added a link to test it...but
...what happe
James E. Bailey wrote:
> Surely the calculations can be performed outside of lilypond,
> and then simply input into lilypond for a score, right? Or am I
> missing something?
Sure, but scheme can greatly facilitate things. I should clarify
that algorithmic music hardly represents the bulk of my Lil
Definitely like alternative style 1 ( the green ) better.
Patrick
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 12.08.2009, at 19:33, Mark Polesky wrote:
James E. Bailey wrote:
Personally, I think this is an area where knowing too much gets in
the
way. I, for example, have no clue about Scheme. Scheme is, as far as
I'm concerned, what other people do to save typing. In fact, I'm of
the opinion that
On 12.08.2009, at 20:41, Mark Polesky wrote:
James E. Bailey wrote:
Really? What can't you do without Scheme?
Algorithmic music.
- Mark
Surely the calculations can be performed outside of lilypond, and
then simply input into lilypond for a score, right? Or am I missing
something?
Jam
James E. Bailey wrote:
> Really? What can't you do without Scheme?
Algorithmic music.
- Mark
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Mark Knoop wrote:
>
>> At 18:50 on 12 Aug 2009, michel.villene...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > I don't understand why the fingering indications are up and not
>> > "down" because I specified it by : \set finger
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Mark Knoop wrote:
> At 18:50 on 12 Aug 2009, michel.villene...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I don't understand why the fingering indications are up and not
> > "down" because I specified it by : \set fingeringOrientations =
> > #'(down) Sorry if it's a stupid question bu
For fingering orientation to take effect, you have to put the note inside a
chord construct <>. I thought we had added a warning about this. Here's what
it should look like:
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(down)
4
Ok I've just added this warning about the chord construct requirement to the
At 18:50 on 12 Aug 2009, michel.villene...@gmail.com wrote:
> I don't understand why the fingering indications are up and not
> "down" because I specified it by : \set fingeringOrientations =
> #'(down) Sorry if it's a stupid question but I can't see where is my
> mistake.
\set fingeringOrientatio
James E. Bailey wrote:
> Personally, I think this is an area where knowing too much gets in the
> way. I, for example, have no clue about Scheme. Scheme is, as far as
> I'm concerned, what other people do to save typing. In fact, I'm of
> the opinion that there's no need to use Scheme, it's just th
On 12.08.2009, at 16:55, denis.roe...@loria.fr wrote:
Yes, thank you! This is almost what I want. Can I also put the
instrument information on several lines, for instance
mensural
notation
?
Thanks again,
Denis
Yes you can. Instrument names support markup text, which can be set
in
On 12.08.2009, at 12:26, Simon Mackenzie wrote:
Yeah it's proving to be an interesting learning experience trying
to wrap my head around Lilypond. I feel it is like a multi-headed
beast with Scheme & Lilypond script intermingled together. It makes
for an interesting mix to get ones head ar
fingering down.ly
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Graham Percival wrote:
> Make sure you check out the alternate CSS style #2. This has
> fancy gradient-shaded menu bars, which could be a great hit. It's
> /much/ easier to see which item you have selected. If you like
> it, make sure you let us know, so that it can be added to the
> default lay
Quoting Marek Klein :
Hi,
something like this?
\version "2.13.2"
pattern = { \cadenzaOn e'4 e'2. e'1 e'\breve e'\longa \bar "|" }
pmensural = {
\set fontSize = #6
\override NoteHead #'style = #'mensural
\pattern
}
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
\override Staff.InstrumentName #'sel
Hi,
something like this?
\version "2.13.2"
pattern = { \cadenzaOn e'4 e'2. e'1 e'\breve e'\longa \bar "|" }
pmensural = {
\set fontSize = #6
\override NoteHead #'style = #'mensural
\pattern
}
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
\override Staff.InstrumentName #'self-alignment-X = #LEFT
Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> Could we add a link in the first paragraph to the (upcoming) essay?
> Perhaps on the words "beautifully engraved music". The essay was a
> prominent feature of the previous web design, and says a lot about the
> attention to detail that goes into LilyPond.
I'd like to see
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>> IMO, such a page is best reserved until people have a little bit
>> of experience with lilypond.
> Which will be a quite bad experience without a decent editing
> environment...
I agree with Bertalan. Editing environments are great to help people get
up to s
Op dinsdag 11-08-2009 om 03:49 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Thanks!
> Most of the people who have been working on the website, including
> me, are fed up with it.
> If you feel at all
> enthusiastic about the new website, please consider helpin
I would like to reproduce the first two staves of the section "Note values"
on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensural_notation, with the label
on the left. That is, I am trying to make
Modern ... staff ...
notation (possibly with the note names)
White notation ... staff ...
David,
Thanks for your comments, and for thinking carefully about your LilyPond
use. I'm not sure exactly what you hoped to have happen as a result of this
post, so it's difficult for me to respond. However, I do feel like I need
to clear up one point you made:
On 8/11/09 7:37 PM, "David Fedor
Yeah it's proving to be an interesting learning experience trying to
wrap my head around Lilypond. I feel it is like a multi-headed beast
with Scheme & Lilypond script intermingled together. It makes for an
interesting mix to get ones head around. The manuals are helpful but
there are hugh
> One other thing, much of the time I have questions, but do not know
> how to ask the question. That is extremely frustrating and I don't
> know if there is anything you can do about it. Sometimes i just
> don't know the correct terminology to use. Many things that are
> assumed when you are play
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:07:20AM +0100, Mark Knoop wrote:
> At 20:43 on 11 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Done; I changed it to "LilyPond... music notation for everyone".
>
> It's still in the page title:
>
> LilyPond... music notation for everyone: GNU LilyPond —
> Website
Ick. Ok, I'v
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, August 12, 2009 4:27 AM
4) I really want to have a "return to first page in this section"
link. Currently that's called (main), which is a name that nobody
likes. Find an alternate name for this, which ideally isn't very
long. (otherwise the Manuals 2nd menu
At 20:43 on 11 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12:58PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > - GNU and (new) website can be trimmed from the title.
>
> Done; I changed it to "LilyPond... music notation for everyone".
It's still in the page title:
LilyPond... music nota
Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:55:52AM -0400, Chris Snyder wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
hey, that's life in open-source projects! If you feel at all
enthusiastic about the new website, please consider helping.
I'd like to help, though I realize it's quite la
Carl Sorensen-3 wrote:
>
>
>
> Is there a reason why you can't use lilypond-book? That's the best way I
> know of to combind LilyPond with LaTeX.
>
>
>
It is.
But I use LyX, which simplifies almost every LaTeX operation, it only makes
difficoult - if not impossible - to use third-party m
Hi, I also do like the new web, thank you all!
2009/8/12 Graham Percival
>
> 1) The current Introduction->Features and Introduction->Examples
> pages are intended to condense three pages from the old site. One
> -user reader looked through them and said that the new page looks
> fine, but I'd
45 matches
Mail list logo
