On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:55:10 +0200
"Libero Mureddu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course I'm not just trowing a stone here and hiding my hand here
> (italian motto... :-), that means that I'm ready to take the time and
> effort to work on the points I suggested (clearly with the help of
> others)
Op maandag 7 juli 2008, schreef Marc Mouries:
> I checked LilyKDE, LilyPond for KDE: http://lilykde.googlecode.com/ and
> it looks great. I wish something like this existed for Mac.
It should be possible to run LilyKDE on Mac (using KDE from fink or macports),
but Rumor will probably not work.
b
Hi Jesse,
How can I do this?
Search the LSR for "barline": there are lots of examples, including
at least one which is exactly what you need.
Hope this helps,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mai
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to duplicate a renaissance Palestrina-type score from a
book called "The Craft of Modal Counterpoint" by Thomas Benjamin. I
want to remove the barlines from the height of the staff but keep the
barline spanners that span the space between each staff in a score.
How can I do
Hi guys,
http://www.nabble.com/file/p18330018/1.jpg
Is there a way to get the tie to connect with the notes, when the staff has
changed clef in the tie?
Thanks
George
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ties%2C-and-Clef-change---disembodied-tie-ends-tp18330018p18330018.ht
Dear all,
When I compile my lytex file with a piano music example, it seems that
LaTex shrinks the space between systems, so the output is not ok. The
systems looks too tight. When I compile only the music example, the
distance between the system are ok.
Note that I am talking about the distanc
Am 08.07.2008 um 00:04 schrieb Uri Sala:
Dear James,
Thanks but, again, this is misleading, since the numbers in the
bracket would be 6:5 but there would be 3 notes inside the tuplet. I
don't have 6 attacks but 3. This is the kind of cheating I do in
Sibelius, and that I would like to avo
Am 08.07.2008 um 00:04 schrieb Uri Sala:
Dear James,
Thanks but, again, this is misleading, since the numbers in the
bracket would be 6:5 but there would be 3 notes inside the tuplet. I
don't have 6 attacks but 3. This is the kind of cheating I do in
Sibelius, and that I would like to avo
Dear Kieren,
Thanks for the crash course in tweaking. As far as I understand, one
has to "manually" output the desired text in the bracket. This seems
incredibly laborious, especially for those that, as me, only write
tuplets, and with several nesting levels. Is is possible to turn
tupletE
Dear lilypondusers,
how can I achieve the end of the TextSpanner together with the last
shorter-rest in the below quoted example:
%% begin %%%
\version "2.11.49"
pedal = { \once \override TextSpanner #'outside-staff-priority = #500
\textSpannerDown
\once \override TextSpanner #'bound
Hi Uri,
So, the only solution is to indicate in the bracket 3$:5& (where
$=eight note sign
and &=sixteen note sign). I am very new to lilypond, and know no
scheme.
Is what I am asking possible?
Absolutely -- the following example, while not perfect, should give
you the hints you need.
Hi all!
I'm writing a little collection of drum grooves. For each groove I would
like
to have a midi file. Since now I used the following method:
[code]
I = \drummode {
\override Beam #'positions = #'(5 . 5)
\repeat volta 2 {
tomfh16 hh hh sn hh sn sn hh
bd8 hh16
Dear James,
Thanks but, again, this is misleading, since the numbers in the
bracket would be 6:5 but there would be 3 notes inside the tuplet. I
don't have 6 attacks but 3. This is the kind of cheating I do in
Sibelius, and that I would like to avoid if possible. Sorry to be so
demanding,
Dear Kieren,
thanks for your answer.
I thought about that, but the problem is that, again, most performers
will assume that the values X:Y refer to same rhythmic values, and
will hesitate about the total duration. The need is there to
explicitly (graphically, with a rhythmic unit) show what
Am 07.07.2008 um 22:14 schrieb Uri Sala:
It is a bit more convoluted than that. I will try to make myself
clearer:
I want to write 3 against 5. In this case, since 3 is smaller than
5, it has to use a rhythmic unit twice longer than the unit
associated with 5. Let's be over-explicit and ca
Thanks, nice to hear that the system is fine - any chance to get an
automatic update in a regular interval?!
Even if we can't get real time we would very much appreciate to know where
we are and not to waste our time looking for phantoms...
The snippet repository is very valuable but being so b
Hi Uri,
I want to write 3 against 5. [...]
I will argue against most people and most notation manuals and most
modern scores that the only correct way to notate this is 3 eight-
notes
I often feel the same way -- depending on the situation, I often want
(e.g.) 2 half notes as a "tuplet" in
Hi
I met an issue with lilypond-book 2.11.49 with Windows XP SP2
When I try to compile the lytex file including some \lilypondfile tag, I
got the following messages
Microsoft Windows XP [version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
D:\renaud\Ma musique\CahierDeChants>lilypond-bo
Thank you, Neil. That is a very good point and I'm now switching to
standard \markup usage. An thanks to everyone who chimed in here. I
have been trying to develop a way to notate for my instrument, the
Chapman Stick, for a long time. I really made a big leap today.
-Eric
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3
It is a bit more convoluted than that. I will try to make myself clearer:
I want to write 3 against 5. In this case, since 3 is smaller than 5, it has
to use a rhythmic unit twice longer than the unit associated with 5. Let's
be over-explicit and call this "3 equally spaced attacks within the durat
Hi Eric,
2008/7/7 Eric Knapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have one more piece of the puzzle to solve. How do you translate
> this markup command into scheme?
>
> \draw-line #'(4 . 4)
#:draw-line '(4 . 4) or #:draw-line (cons 4 4)
> Some of the markup commands call for pairs of numbers. I can't find
I have one more piece of the puzzle to solve. How do you translate
this markup command into scheme?
\draw-line #'(4 . 4)
Some of the markup commands call for pairs of numbers. I can't find
any docs for how the pairs are coded in scheme.
Thanks,
-Eric
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Eric Knap
I think I have seen some clever solution on the mailing list,
that redefined the function that draws the stem, in order to
automatically get it correctly placed. I don't remember if it
was a slash or a cross or something else that was placed on
the stem, though. Try to search the archives and perh
Thanks, Victor! I see the correct syntax now and I have it working.
This is really great, I've been trying to do this for a long time.
-Eric
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:23 PM, V!ctor Adán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> here are a few more examples.
> The first (headCircle) is the one
Hello Eric,
here are a few more examples.
The first (headCircle) is the one I had given before. It just calls
musicgryph inside a markup.
The second (headTriW) just draws a triangle. Notice how you can set the size
with the fontsize command.
The third (headXinD) combines (with the combine directi
urisala wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The only way one can write a tuplet such as "3 notes in the duration of 7
> 16ths " in a consistent and correct way with a general law of tuplet
> notation is to assign the rhythmic value of a quarter note to the 3 notes,
> so that the total value is of 12 16ths (the fir
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Offtopic, but I'm always wondering, how this can happen.
> What changed in the last 10 years? The C++ specification or the Intel
> architecture?
> Could you explain?
I suspect it's just the ability of mod
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:09 PM, James E. Bailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:20 AM, v!ictor [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello Brian,
There are two things you need to do to create arbitrary noteheads
from
within lilypond:
1. change the NoteH
I have it working when you define glyphs, like this:
headCircle = {\once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override NoteHead #'text = #(markup #:musicglyph
"scripts.flageolet" ) }
What I can't get to work is what Victor mentioned but didn't give and
e
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:20 AM, v!ictor [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello Brian,
There are two things you need to do to create arbitrary noteheads
from
within lilypond:
1. change the NoteHead stencil to the text interface:
\once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #ly:text-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 7. Juli 2008 schrieb Uri Sala:
> The only way one can write a tuplet such as "3 notes in the duration of 7
> 16ths " in a consistent and correct way with a general law of tuplet
> notation is to assign the rhythmic value of a quarter note to
Hi,
The only way one can write a tuplet such as "3 notes in the duration of 7
16ths " in a consistent and correct way with a general law of tuplet
notation is to assign the rhythmic value of a quarter note to the 3 notes,
so that the total value is of 12 16ths (the first rule of a correct
treatment
Hello,
I'm trying to get the second option below to work. This is one where
you use markup commands to create the notehead. I can't get the syntax
right, could you also provide an example of that?
Thanks,
-Eric
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:20 AM, v!ictor [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrot
Hi people,
first of all, I would like to thank lilypond developers for putting in
so much time and effort into this beautiful software. All your hard work
is greatly appreciated.
And now, i explain my problems. I'm using lilypond-2.10.33 on a Ubuntu
8.04 (with no GUI interface but gvim, xpdf
Hi
I met an issue with lilypond-book 2.11.49 with Windows XP SP2
When I try to compile the lytex file including some \lilypondfile tag, I
got the following messages
Microsoft Windows XP [version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
D:\renaud\Ma musique\CahierDeChants>lilypond-bo
on 2008-07-07 at 12:30 Stefan Thomas wrote:
>do You need the slash for a tremolo? If this is the case, postscript
>is much to complicated. You should have a look in the user guide, the
>chapter concerning repeats.
danke, stefan, but what i need is different from the tremolo slash.
it's thinner,
Offtopic, but I'm always wondering, how this can happen.
What changed in the last 10 years? The C++ specification or the Intel
architecture?
Could you explain?
Bert
Patrick Horgan wrote:
I've been working with one of the guile developers,
because the development (git) version of guile, when
u
Op maandag 7 juli 2008, schreef Stefan Thomas:
> Dear Lilypond users,
> in the below quoted example, the positions of the accidentals are not
> convincing, in my opinion. Is there a possibilitie to change this
> generally?
I rewrote your example just to make it more readable (it's a good habit to
Le samedi 05 juillet 2008 à 13:15 -0700, Patrick Horgan a écrit :
> I've been working with one of the guile developers,
> because the development (git) version of guile, when
> used with gcc 4.3 or newer wouldn't build lilypond
> (or a lot of other stuff). Yesterday we figured it out
> and now you
Dear Lilypond users,
in the below quoted example, the positions of the accidentals are not
convincing, in my opinion. Is there a possibilitie to change this generally?
%% begin %%
\relative { \time 3/4 8-> r r2 \time 4/4 8->
r r4 r2 }
% end %%%
_
PortugalG wrote:
>
> Is there a way that i can create slur ending in repeat volta, without
> using cadenza or hidind notes?
> Can i create a broken slur or phasing?
>
does one of these fit?
{
\repeat volta 2 { e 1 ~ }
\alternative {
{ e 2 f 4 e \laissezVibrer | }
{ e 2 \repeatTi
Op maandag 7 juli 2008, schreef Richard Wattenbarger:
> I'm looking for a code snippet to
> generate a vertical curved bracket (i.e.,
> something like a left or open parenthesis).
> Anyone have such a thing? (I suppose
> I'm looking for a variation on the
> arpeggioBracket).
I think such an arpegg
> Am 07.07.2008 um 00:44 schrieb Eluze Weehaeli:
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=490
> Using http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ you can search - e.g. for upbeat or repeat -
> the snippet repository but you will not find this snippet
> Using Browse you can find it after scrolling through several
Am 07.07.2008 um 00:44 schrieb Eluze Weehaeli:
2008/7/1, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've approved the snippet using the first example
(http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=490).
This works perfectly.
Using http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ you can search - e.g. for upbeat or
repeat - the
44 matches
Mail list logo
