It is a bit more convoluted than that. I will try to make myself clearer:
I want to write 3 against 5. In this case, since 3 is smaller than 5, it has
to use a rhythmic unit twice longer than the unit associated with 5. Let's
be over-explicit and call this "3 equally spaced attacks within the duration
of 5 sixteenth-notes." Well, I will argue against most people and most
notation manuals and most modern scores that the only correct way to notate
this is 3 eight-notes against 5 sixteenth notes. Now, neither sibelius nor
ENP nor finale allow me to do this, since they force upon the editor the
assumed notion that nominator and denominator in a tuplet use the same
rhythmic value. This axioma makes it impossible to correctly notate all
possible complex tuplets (with non-binary denominators), and makes the
construction of an algorithm that translates proportional notation (a la
ENP) into lilypond code incredibly convoluted. I thought lilypond was
different - in that I could stipulate different values for nom and denom -
but I am not sure now.
Many people would argue that you can use the same value for both, since 3 is
so close to 5. But that makes your run into a contradiction. The only way
one can stipulate a general and infallible rule for writing tuplets is that
a tuplet is the insertion of a certain number of rhythmic values into a
space that is smaller. Or, to put it another way, a tuplet - a correct one -
is a compression of the duration of a rhythmic value. Very easy to prove:
how would you write 6 against 5 sixteenths? Well, just like that. (times 5/6
{c16 c c c c c}. So, if we write 3 against 5, the value that those three
notes take should be 8th notes, because all we would have to do is aggregate
each 2 sixteenths of the 6:5 into eighth notes. But remember, I want still a
total duration of 5 16ths!! So writing times 5/3 {c8 c c} will result in a
tuplet twice as long in duration than what I want, since lily thinks that I
want the duration to be 5 eighth notes. I have to be able to tell lilypond
that I want 3 eighth notes in the space of 5 sixteenth notes (and that is
just one of many examples. Trying to to 3 against 7 is even more complicated
since the duration is more than twice the attack. In 3 against 7, the three
should be notated with quarter notes!). Hope I made myself understood now.
I hope this does not turn into a discussion of the way to notate tuplets,
since there is only one that is actually inequivocal and consistent.
Unfortunately no editor allows one to produce it, which is a very disturbing
fact.
Could lilypond be the one?
cheers
uri
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Montag, 7. Juli 2008 schrieb Uri Sala:
> > The only way one can write a tuplet such as "3 notes in the duration of 7
> > 16ths " in a consistent and correct way with a general law of tuplet
> > notation is to assign the rhythmic value of a quarter note to the 3
> notes,
> > so that the total value is of 12 16ths (the first rule of a correct
> > treatment of tuplets is that the tuplet is of more value than what it
> > substitutes.
> > Is it possible to assign different rhythmic units to the numerator and
> the
> > denominator of a tuplet?
>
> I'm not sure I understand your question here... Do you mean something like
> \times 12/16 {..} ?
>
> > Is it possible to show those rhytmic figures next
> > to each?
>
> You mean you want 16:12 to be displayed instead of 16?
>
> \override TupletNumber #'text = #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
>
> Cheers,
> Reinhold
>
> - --
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
> * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien,
> http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
> * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
> * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIckj/TqjEwhXvPN0RAhNOAJsHLTE/l+8UIWvWTQrCjv8yXTVx+wCcCnIn
> RM8ZJfupGM7q5WGu4uGv9Rs=
> =0sjn
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
