Marek,
I did this test in v 2.10.25, but I'm using the same trick on another
machine running 2.11.x (can't remember the exact release number) and it
works there too.
I put the \override into your "melody" identifier to get it to work in both
\score sections after I moved the \include to the top:
It's also possible in Lilypond - just add the picture as an EPS markup.
The syntax is:
\markup { \epsfile #1 #1 #"filename.eps" }
Also see the documentation - 8.1.6 Overview of text markup commands.
If you have your image as a bitmap, Inkscape is a good piece of free
software which allows
2007/8/22, Charlotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> I think you're having the same problem I had recently with a similar
> document. I eventually figured out from another post on here that
> somewhere
> in gregorian-init.ly is a property called 'packed-spacing' which is needed
> for gregorian notation
Charlotte,
many thanks for your help.
Where exactly did you put \override ?
Marek
2007/8/22, Charlotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> I think you're having the same problem I had recently with a similar
> document. I eventually figured out from another post on here that
> somewhere
> in gregorian-in
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 21:30, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2007/8/22, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > No, because TimeSignature already accepts an interface
> > (break-aligned-interface) that determines its horizontal position; it
> > wouldn't make sense for it to accept another one. The cl
Marek,
I couldn't get your code to compile at all at first until I fixed a couple
of simple problems.
I think you need to remove the spaces within the quotes in your \include
(should be \include "gregorian-init.ly").
Also, you've got upper-case 'S' in your first two \Score marks. This needs
to
Hi,
I try to combine standard notation with gregorian notation like this:
section1 standard
section2 gregorian
section3 standard...
I am using \include "gregorian-init.ly " in second section. How should I
"re-init" before section3 to have back default formating?
Here you can see, how it looks like
With lilypond-book this isn´t a problem because you can create normal LaTeX
documents with everything you know from LaTeX ...
2007/8/22, Marek Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi, is it possible to have pictures in lilypond score, or lilypond book?
>
> Marek Klein,
> Slovakia
> http://gregoriana.sk
Hi, is it possible to have pictures in lilypond score, or lilypond book?
Marek Klein,
Slovakia
http://gregoriana.sk
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Roy!
Yes, Lilypond supports tab. In the version I use (2.6.5) the guitar tab is a
little limited compared to what you sometimes see for wild rock guitar solo's,
but it should be effective for things that don't need advanced guitar
technique. I'm not sure if the newer versions have added a
Hi --
I intend to produce songbooks of my songs in piano/vocal format with occasional
lines of guitar tablature. Is Lilypond capable of doing that?
Thank you,
Roy
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
Nobody?
Can one do \arpeggioUp and erase the zig-zag line, then print a postscript
line at it's place?
Henrik Frisk wrote:
>
>
>> Is there any easy solution to make an arrow (up or down) out of an
>> arpeggio?
>> Somenthing like \arpeggioUp or \arpeggioDown but instead of getting a
>> zigzag
Hi,
I try to combine standard notation with gregorian notation like this:
section1 standard
section2 gregorian
section3 standard...
I am using \include "gregorian-init.ly " in second section. How should I
"re-init" before section3 to have back default formating?
Here you can see, how it looks lik
2007/8/22, Malcolm Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Looks like a good programme.
This is quite an euphemism :)
> Could you tell me how I could write the Title "ONETWO" composed by "ML" to
> the following
Just insert it in a \header block:
\header {
title= "OneTwo"
composer= "ML"
}
You might w
Hi,
I try to combine standard notation with gregorian notation like this:
section1 standard
section2 gregorian
section3 standard...
I am using \include " gregorian-init.ly " in second section. How should I
"re-init" before section3 to have back default formating?
Here you can see, how it looks like
Looks like a good programme. However, I have a problem writing the Title,
Composer and comment about the tempo
Could you tell me how I could write the Title "ONETWO" composed by "ML" to the
following
<<
\relative c' {
\time 4/4
c d e f
g a b c
}
\addlyrics { One two three
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 03:15:53PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
[...]
> > A score that starts with an \grace section needs an explicit \context
> > Voice declaration, otherwise the main note and grace note end up on
> > different staves.
> >
> >But it would be nice if the manual had an example.
Now I realize that you didn't read the relevant part of the text.
What you should read is the paragraph starting with
"Grace note synchronization can also lead to surprises. ..."
/Mats
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Ed Ravin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:04:47AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
T
Ed Ravin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:04:47AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
This bug is described in the manual in the section on grace notes,
together with an explanation on how to solve the problem.
Funny, I've read that section many times, and even down to the bottom
when I wa
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:04:47AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> This bug is described in the manual in the section on grace notes,
> together with an explanation on how to solve the problem.
Funny, I've read that section many times, and even down to the bottom
when I was first learning LilyPond
2007/8/22, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No, because TimeSignature already accepts an interface
> (break-aligned-interface) that determines its horizontal position; it
> wouldn't make sense for it to accept another one. The cleanest way of getting
> this functionality into the lilypond core, i
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 20:34, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> That being said, do you think it would be a good idea to make
> TimeSignature accept the break-alignable-interface?
No, because TimeSignature already accepts an interface
(break-aligned-interface) that determines its horizontal position
2007/8/21, Michael Käppler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe you could enhance your example by something like this:
> % To avoid inequal spacing if some systems start with a brace and others
> don't,
> % make all systems have braces and then optically remove the unwanted ones.
That is a good idea, bu
23 matches
Mail list logo