2007/8/22, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No, because TimeSignature already accepts an interface > (break-aligned-interface) that determines its horizontal position; it > wouldn't make sense for it to accept another one. The cleanest way of getting > this functionality into the lilypond core, in my opinion, would be to create > a whole new grob class.
Thank you for your explanations; I'm not yet completely familiar with all this stuff, but I'm getting closer. Is it silly to suggest that maybe the break-aligned-interface itself could accept some reference symbols? Besides, can you explain why, in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond-internals-big-page#break_002daligned_002dinterface the "user settable properties" mentions the "old" break-align-symbol (symbol) syntax, and how it could (or couldn't) be used to align such grobs as TimeSignatures, which depends on break-aligned-interface? Or is this indication deprecated? Thank you very much for your time. This Break Alignment thing looks quite important in understanding how LilyPond works. Regards, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
