> On 12-Feb-05, at 4:38 PM, Carl Bolstad wrote:
> > I've been using (and loving!) LilyPond for about six months, and now I
> > need to make a tweak that I just can't figure out. I have moved a note
> > over a little bit, but I can't move the ledger line for it to match.
>
> Try using the force-hsh
On 18-Feb-05, at 3:34 AM, Thies Albrecht wrote:
I wonder if anybody ever got aware of the fact, that the instrument
name in the page head isn't exactly centered. Depending on odd or even
page it is put a little to the right or left.
I don't know whether it's a bug or not, but let's send this to t
I finished my first small score today (a four-page piano piece).
LilyPond is a great program. This has been an interesting and
challenging learning experience. The last two bars of the piece
took almost as long as the entire rest of the work, but I finally
figured out one way to solve the probl
On 18-Feb-05, at 2:06 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
I'm confused. what's this
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-01/msg00249.html
about thhen?
It's an experimental package source that should only be used by
experienced
unix people. It's not available in fink stable or fink unstab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > OK. How is this different from
> >
> > \lyricmode { \markup { C \majSymbol \super { 7 9 } }
> >
> > except for the \lyricmode and \markup ?
>
> (For starters, wouldn't you have to specify another font, since chords
> and lyrics fonts are different?)
that's my poi
> that's my point: you want some simple changes to font selection, but
> it seems to me that you are asking for syntactic sugar, but I can't
> figure out which syntactic sugar you want.
Well, look at the Finale Jazzcord font set I linked to. Is it possible
to get all those symbols as easily as any
> OK. How is this different from
>
> \lyricmode { \markup { C \majSymbol \super { 7 9 } }
>
> except for the \lyricmode and \markup ?
(For starters, wouldn't you have to specify another font, since chords
and lyrics fonts are different?)
Well, I guess the point I was trying to make was that t
> Isn't there a contradiction between the claim that Jazz is not a
> classical form of art, and some assertive statement about "the only
> appropriate way things should be done"
No contradiction.
I wasn't suggesting that there's only ONE way to do it, I was saying
that since there ISN'T only one
>
> I'd have to say I'd be wary of anyone who has a degree in jazz from a
> conservatory. Jazz is not a classical art form; conservatories are for
> teaching classical forms of music, and no decent jazz musician has
> ever received his/her education from such a place. (I could say
> something abou
Regarding lilypond-user, are there guidelines for posting, whether
attachments are allowed, what kind of attachments are allowed, etc.?
In searching the archives I found that PNG images were at one time
discouraged (during the first quarter of 2004). If PNG or GIF images are
now allowed (to ill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> will typeset it for you in style x, y, or z", you instead say, "I want
> a C, with the MAJ symbol as a superscript/subscript, with numbers
> going up like this" etc.
OK. How is this different from
\lyricmode { \markup { C \majSymbol \super { 7 9 } }
except for the \
> It's because they're actual content. Consider printing a part with
> your style of chord naming, and then having to give the same part to
> someone used to ignatzek, with Danish notenames. With a neat
> representation like the pitches that would be replacing
>
> \set chordNameFunction = #real-
> Regarding your offer/request, I can only estimate how much work it
> would be if you can send me chart, similar to the one in
>
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Chord-name-chart
>
> with your desired layout. If you insist on a text-only approach, I can
> c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > There is hope for you here. You might wish to contribute to Han-Wen's
> > offer in the long thread at
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-02/msg00174.html
>
> While I can wait for the jazz articulations, I do feel strongly enough
> about this to
Hello,
I've installed version 2.0.3 (I could not get de most recent one to work
at all).
This version succeeds in building ps and pdf partition.. however, I have
a problem with the lilypond-book option. When I use the lilypond
command, it seems to work nicely (as you can see from output 1)
Howev
> There is hope for you here. You might wish to contribute to Han-Wen's
> offer in the long thread at
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-02/msg00174.html
While I can wait for the jazz articulations, I do feel strongly enough
about this to actually pay money for a chord system
> You're spot on that the authors come from a classical background, but
> "getting things right" unfortunately doesn't exist. The current chord
> name system as well as the chord-comping notation was recommended to
> us by a Jazz-piano graduate from (I believe) Berlin conservatory. She
> may still
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Did you set this previously? It says group the tuplets in quarter (1
/ 4) note groups which is smaller than the grouping you are
indicating. The correct one for a 4 quarter note (one whole note)
grouping would be:
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-m
The math is very simple, you want to squeeze in 3 half notes
to have the same duration as 2 normal half notes, so each of them
has to be 2/3 times as long as normal.
The tupletSpannerDuration property, on the other hand, is something
completely different. Normally, when you use \times 2/3 {...}, yo
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:04:08 +0100, Maurizio Tomasi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not sure, but perhaps this could be useful to you:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-11/msg00465.html
Hi,
I was glad to see this example, because there are quite a few places
where I needed t
Paul Scott wrote:
Chip wrote:
Now that the previous triplets question is answered and working
properly howabout this one -
I have 4/4 time, 3 triplet 1/2 notes in one measure. I can get the 3
notes in the measure, but the triplet indicator is the # 3 under each
individual note, and no bar.
\ti
Hi everybody!
I wonder if anybody ever got aware of the fact, that the instrument name
in the page head isn't exactly centered. Depending on odd or even page
it is put a little to the right or left.
You can verify this, when compiling the following code and comparing
page head of p.2-3:
\head
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> However, the web site _should_ say 2.5.0, not 2.5.9. I've fixed this.
>
> Kieren, you may find the experimental CVS to be of interest, and bug
> reports
> about it would be great, but for production use definitely stay with
I'm confused. what's this
http://lists.g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Now, I am aware that the authors of Lilypond come from a very
> traditional music background, and probably have very little experience
> with modern forms of music. (The antiquated chord symbol chart is
> probably better proof of this than anything.*) Unlike others I don
As a mere new user, I'm not qualified to comment on most of your points,
but there are two I'd like to pick up on:
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 07:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lilypond makes many assumptions about musical symbols, and notation in
> general, that are very rigidly tied to classical conce
Paul Scott wrote:
Chip wrote:
Now that the previous triplets question is answered and working
properly howabout this one -
I have 4/4 time, 3 triplet 1/2 notes in one measure. I can get the 3
notes in the measure, but the triplet indicator is the # 3 under each
individual note, and no bar.
\t
26 matches
Mail list logo
