[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > However, the web site _should_ say 2.5.0, not 2.5.9. I've fixed this. > > Kieren, you may find the experimental CVS to be of interest, and bug > reports > about it would be great, but for production use definitely stay with
I'm confused. what's this http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-01/msg00249.html about thhen? > 2.4.2. > > - Graham > > On 17-Feb-05, at 12:52 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > > See > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-02/msg00262.html > > > > /Mats > > > > Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote: > > > >> Hello, all! > >> > >> Finally back (after a long hiatus from beyond-the-Pond), and fink > >> updated my unstable install. But the version now listed is 2.5.0, not > >> 2.5.9 as indicated on the website -- is that expected? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Kieren. > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> lilypond-user mailing list > >> lilypond-user@gnu.org > >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lilypond-user mailing list > > lilypond-user@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
