As described in a previous e-mail, I have a helluva large cadenza
printed for solo violin. It is unmeasured, and it probably has a length
only calculatable using 32nd notes. If I want to start tutti playing
back up after the cadenza, what do I do? Include s(x)*32 in every
instrument's ly file t
Milan M. Horák wrote:
Wanting to add a "ritt." mark to a piece, I have encountered a problem. I have
already done it in some piese earlier, but it was long ago and I am quite
sure the ancient version of LilyPond I used printed this "ritt." in nice
italics. Now, I get only a normal roman (and ug
I want to adjust the staff-position of a single MultiMeasureRest. That
is, I have an R1 that I want to place hanging from the top staff line
rather than the center line. This will keep it out of the way of some
cue notes. I tried:
\once \override Staff.MultimeasureRest #'staff-position = #5
Bu
Do you mean how it should be notated or how to get it in the MIDI output
from LilyPond?
For the notation, I usually write it like
1x f
2x p
below the staff, at least when I write it in by hand in an orchestral
part. I'm not sure if I have seen it in printed scores, though.
/Mats
Edward Sanford
(I'm sorry if I sent this twice; I didn't receive a copy of the message
even though I am set to receive copies of my own messages, so I
thought that maybe it hadn't been delivered.)
Hello,
I am using Lilypond 2.1.28 on Mac OS X 10.3.2. I can't manually set
the horizontal spacing of my music. The
Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
Oh, one other thing in regards to chords, when you have a repeat, the
chord names are ontop of the repeat marks...
+--G7--B7--A7-- +--A7--B7--C7--
| 1: | 2:
etc... Is their any way to fix that?
I asked that on February 22 and got from Walter Hofmeister:
>> I hope that (the project leaders and) you find a way to make your SPAM
>> dragnet more porous for legitimate users. What measures can be taken
>> from the user's end to run your gaunlet more quickly?
I guess I wasn't clear. I was simply pointing out that there might
be an additional moderatio
David Bobroff scripsit:
> \markup{\italic "rit."}
Thank a lot.
BTW, I have meanwhile found another possibility ("raise" to place the markup a
little higher):
^#'((bold italic) ((raise . 1.2) "ritt."))
Regards
Milan Horak
Hello All.
How can I suppress the output of notated chord names (sounds like piano
chords) in the MIDI output of a piece?
--
Yours truly, WBR, Paul Argentoff.
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIPE: PA1291-RIPE
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECT
Thanks for the \grace {skip} suggestion. I haven't tried it yet.
Somewhat related to this thread:
I want to use the "slash" style grace without a slur. I discovered in
the acciaccatura definition that this is done with some bit of scheme
which I don't remember at the moment but could find again
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> .29 is listed as having fixed some MIDI bugs, but doesn't elaborate on
> that. What specifically was fixed? Are ties back in? Will my MIDI no
yes.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
__
Please always tell what LilyPond version you use and on what kind of
system.
As long as you just want a Postscript file to print out, you could
just as well use dvips without these extra flags. This will give you
bitmapped fonts on the file, which is OK, at least if you have
configured your teTeX i
Version 2.5.0 of the LilyPond exporting musical score editor
NoteEdit is available:
http://rnvs.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/noteedit/noteedit.html
New features:
- Octaviation (va - lines)
- better mouse positioning support: A gray note near
the cursor snaps to the l
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = Lilypond-user Digest, Vol 16, Issue 29
Scanning time = 3/12/2004 4:18:01 AM
Engine/Pattern = 6.860-1001/811
Action on virus found:
The message body cont
At 09:53 AM 3/12/2004, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 01:48, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> > > Is there a preferred way to have two dif
> G7 / / / | D7 / G7 / | etc?
If you don't need slashes you can use
g:7 s2. | etc.
I don't know what to do to have slashes in chord names.
> Oh, one other thing in regards to chords, when you have a repeat, the
> chord names are ontop of the repeat marks...
See:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/h
I've just finished editing an email interview with Han-Wen (with Jan
also putting in some observations), and it's now up on
http://www.linuxmusician.com/
I think it's good stuff, and I'd like to thank the interviewees for
rolling out such an interesting interview almost unbidden, with very
>Wanting to add a "ritt." mark to a piece, I have encountered a problem. I
have
>already done it in some piese earlier, but it was long ago and I am quite
>sure the ancient version of LilyPond I used printed this "ritt." in nice
>italics. Now, I get only a normal roman (and ugly) "ritt." and see
"G. Nulla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this tutorial available for download in postscript
> format, and if so, from where?
Seems like you are using some really old info. Try
http://lilypond.org/web/documentation.html
--
Feri.
___
Lilypond-user
MC writes:
> After a bit of a steep learning curve (getting to
> grips with Linux, emacs and Lilypond all at once...)
Wow, that sounds like quite an effort you made. Maybe you can share
some of your experiences for other new users? Things you could not
find in the documentation, perhaps?
> I'v
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 01:48, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
section of
On Friday 12 March 2004 05:18, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > When numbering measures at the beginning of a line, if there be a
> > line break in the middle of the measure, the number should be that
> > of the *following* measure, not the current measure which is
> > broken
>> On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
>> > On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
>> > > Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
>> > > section of music to indicate that it is played at one level the
>> > > first time and
How do you check the result, do you look at the .dvi, .ps, .pdf
or the output of the printer? If you used a PDF, how did you generate
it? The recommended procedure is
dvips -Ppdf -u+lilyond file.dvi
ps2pdf file.ps
If you didn't use these extra flags to dvips and look at the PDF
in Acrobat, it may b
On Friday 12 March 2004 01:48, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> > > Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
> > > section of music to indi
Just starting out using LilyPond...
When I run LilyPond alone, music is rendering fine, but if I include
LilyPond markup in a LaTeX document, the final layout doesn't include
ledger lines - notes above and below the staff are just hanging in
space!
I have also tried embedding examples from the L
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 17:17:59 +
Edwin Spector <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just ran through the installation of Cygwin/Lilypond. I downloaded the test.ly
file, but it does not appear to have any association with Lilypond. The PC
doesn't know what to open it with. I'm run
On Thursday 11 March 2004 23:46, Paul Scott wrote:
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> >On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> >> Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
> >>section of music to indicate that it is played at one level the
> >> first ti
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
When numbering measures at the beginning of a line, if there be a line
break in the middle of the measure, the number should be that of the
*following* measure, not the current measure which is broken. I should
have pointed that out.
That's because it is not possible
It seems the new syntax has not made it into the manual yet, the
correct syntax is
\paper{
\context{
\ScoreContext
\override SpacingSpanner #'spacing-increment = #3.0
}
}
For the bar numbers, why not use the \once feature and also combine both
settings in a single identifier?
bigBar = {
On Monday 08 March 2004 06:43, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> As a musician, I would find if very confusing if a bar number was
> printed in the middle of a bar. Imagine an orchestra rehearsal, where
> the conductor says a bar number and half the orchestra starts a half
> bar off, since they don't realiz
Thanks, I figured it out after posting the message, which apparently
took several days to show up on the list.
Regards,
Chip
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2004 10:37, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2004 01:58, chip wrote:
I am trying to get a measure like this
32 matches
Mail list logo
