Hi,
Sorry if this is covered in the manual, I can't find it anywhere. Is
it possible to insert pieces of text anywhere within the score? I'm
thinking about comments and whatnot and it would be useful to be able
to place them wherever. If this is not possible, what are the
possibilities in L
Solaris 2.8 sparc/ gcc 3.3.1
Make failed with:
make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/archive/packages/lilypond-2.0.1/lily'
rm -f ./out/apply-context-iterator.dep;
DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/apply-context-iterator.dep ./out/apply-context-iterator.o"
g++ -c -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSTRING_UTILS_INLINED
Jost-
If this were me, I would investigate performance practices
at the time and place this work was a) written and b)
published (maybe even down to the particular composer). If
you can look at the provenance of that publisher's source,
and know the editor's reputation, those will help, too.
Hope
Hello list,
Does anybody knows how to put a double bar at the beginning of the Staff? The nearest
that i have approached to solution is this:
\score{
\notes{
\partial 256 s256 \bar"||" c'1 | e'1 | f'1 | s1 \bar"||"
}
\paper{
raggedright = ##t
\translator {
\StaffContext
\r
Hello,
I have a file I've used before and works just fine with paper20 and
paper16. But it gives errors when trying to use paper19. Pertinent
information is below ( file and error output). What could be causing this?
Thanks in advance!
Bryan
=begin rand-notes.ly===
\header {
I'm transcribing some music to Lilypond in which one hand spans both the RH and
LH staffs of a PianoStaff. In the 1.9.8 (or there abouts) I had it working fine
and the score compiled, the output was produced. In 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 I haven't
been able to make it work. Has \translate Staff = whate
On Thursday 02 October 2003 07:37 am, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I don't really understand what you mean, but it seems that you
> are making things more complicated than necessary.
>
> If you want to separate the music input, the titling and the
> actual definitions of what should be included in a spe
This seems to be the answer... Thanks, Graham.
Regards,
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Diosnel Herrnsdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 02:26
Subject: Re: Need help with Tempo marking / Arpeggios
> On
yes this reminds me of lilypond book a bit.
I could make a make file to include pieces after the lilypond process as
well, but I now get the idea.
now I have some more pieces to get and I will be able to start.
Thanks
Aaron
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 14:59, Dick Schoeller wrote:
> Aaron,
>
> What I,
Hi,
I have some questions on which I could not find answers in the documentation
nor in the mailing list archives. I hope somebody can help me! If I
overlooked something, forgive me.
- I have to change the clef in the lower Staff of a PianoStaff from treble to
clef, at the end of a bar. This le
Aaron,
What I, and I think many others do, is to create one or more files with
the common stuff. Then include those files into a file that contains a
score block and references to the specific pieces that you want from the
common source. You can have several different top level files, for
exampl
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 14:37, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I don't really understand what you mean, but it seems that you
> are making things more complicated than necessary.
believe me I am trying to simplify things. Three hundred files and
multiple outcomes.
>
> If you want to separate the music input
I would say it all depends on when the music was written, what
edition you use as a a starting point and on the purpose of your
own edition. The practice has certainly changed over the centuries,
but also between different composers. If you have a good source
and the intended performers are experts
I don't really understand what you mean, but it seems that you
are making things more complicated than necessary.
If you want to separate the music input, the titling and the
actual definitions of what should be included in a specific score,
you could put the definitions in separate files and use t
"Walsh, Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello
>
> I am trying to make a passage "p dolce". What is the best way to do this?
I tend to use something along the lines of c4-#'(italic (dynamic "p") " dolce"),
but I'm still stuck at 1.6 and the syntax may have changed.
--
Arvid
___
Ok I seeOn Thu,
how do i make this conditional,
What I am thinking of is creating the files with "conditional text"
storing them in a database and issing a command that would have the
database or a repository output a book with no header info because the
info will be in a latex file for instance. F
Hi,
I'm rather new to LilyPond and music typesetting and currently doing my first
larger work. While porting my files to version 2.0.0 I noticed that LilyPond
now has \appoggiatura and \acciaccatura keywords, which makes things much
easier (not having to set stroke-style every time etc.). These
How about
c _\markup{\dynamic "p" "dolce"}
(assuming that you use LilyPond 1.8 or newer)
Mats
Walsh, Patrick wrote:
Hello
I am trying to make a passage "p dolce". What is the best way to do this?
Thanks
patrick
You could easily have different header information in different
score blocks, just say
\score{
...
\header{
title = "The title for this particular score block"
...
}
}
If you want different annotations within the music, it's easiest to
put them in separate definition
annotationsVersio
That shouldn't be too hard, especially if you are compiling Lily
yourself and can set the installation directory using
./configure --prefix=...
If you have at least one of the installations in a directory with
write access for ordinary users, then the generated font files for
the two versions shoul
It should work to add (untested):
\midi{
\translator{
\VoiceContext
\remove "Dynamic_performer"
}
}
at the beginning of your file.
Mats
Ricardo Kirkner wrote:
Hi:
I am transcribing some choral scores for practicing. What I would want
to achieve is to get dynamics into the score
Rune Zedeler wrote:
Amelie Zapf wrote:
Is there a way to install two versions of Lilypond on one computer
(Linux, preferably system-wide), without running into problems? I tend
to think that fonts, and generally the whole LaTeX interaction could
be a problem. Is that so?
I think that the ea
Amelie Zapf wrote:
Is there a way to install two versions of Lilypond on one computer (Linux,
preferably system-wide), without running into problems? I tend to think that
fonts, and generally the whole LaTeX interaction could be a problem. Is that
so?
I think that the easiest way (the one I use
Hi everybody,
For "production" reasons, I haven't upgraded from Lily 1.6.10 yet. However,
I'm excited about Lilypond 2.0 and would love to try it out.
Is there a way to install two versions of Lilypond on one computer (Linux,
preferably system-wide), without running into problems? I tend to thi
24 matches
Mail list logo
