Aaah... OK, I understand. But that's no problem at all. Excuse me if
this isn't all that clear -- it's 6 am, and I must go to bed. You just
need to have something like (this could not be the exact stuff as I
have not looked it up in the manual):
\property Voice.DynamicText \set #'transparent = ##
FB> This is a problem for me. We can save a lot of space on the full score
FB> (for the conductor) when combining parts but there should be an option
FB> to write only once dynamic that should appear exactly at the same place.
FB> Otherwise, they are written one over the other slightly shifted
Le 06/21/03 05:38, Niki Pantelias a écrit :
One thing I do notice is that I get multiple dynamic markings on the
staff with the combined voices. But since I'm the only one who will see
the score, I can live with that.
This is a problem for me. We can save a lot of space on the full score
(for
NP> One thing I do notice is that I get multiple dynamic markings on the
NP> staff with the combined voices. But since I'm the only one who will see
NP> the score, I can live with that.
Would you care to send the .ly source file as an attachment to this
list?
Jeremy
___
Aha! I thought I had tried that, but I had not explicitly specified the
voice context for the individual parts... so I added that and it is much
better now. Thanks, Jeremy!
One thing I do notice is that I get multiple dynamic markings on the
staff with the combined voices. But since I'
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 02:10:45 +0200
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Han-Wen was defending his doctoral thesis earlier today, so maybe
> > that from now on, we should take the habit of using `Dr.' when
> > addressing him! :-)
>
> That's only for the people
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi, everybody.
>
> Han-Wen was defending his doctoral thesis earlier today, so maybe that from
> now on, we should take the habit of using `Dr.' when addressing him! :-)
That's only for the people that used to call me ir. Nienhuys (they may
now call me dr. ir. Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> GP> What version are you using? I just tested it on a CVS version from 1.7.20,
> GP> and it worked. The grace notes appear at the beginning of the next bar,
> GP> instead of at the end of their proper bar, but it _does_ compile.
>
> On the current stable version, i
GP> You can fake it with spacer rests. (I'm getting quite famous at faking
GP> this with spaces! )
GP> d4 e f e \grace{e16 f g} \partial 64 s64 |
GP> Since the grace note isn't at the end of the bar, it should work. Of
GP> course, it's ugly and you shouldn't need to do it.
Thanks Graham :-)
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 22:50:40 +0200
Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GP> What version are you using? I just tested it on a CVS version
> from 1.7.20, GP> and it worked. The grace notes appear at the
> beginning of the next bar, GP> instead of at the end of their proper
> bar, but it _does_ comp
GP> What version are you using? I just tested it on a CVS version from 1.7.20,
GP> and it worked. The grace notes appear at the beginning of the next bar,
GP> instead of at the end of their proper bar, but it _does_ compile.
On the current stable version, it did not compile. But from what
you'r
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:17:47 +0200
Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #2: THIS SNIPPET WON'T COMPILE BECAUSE OF GRACE NOTES AT THE END OF
> THE MEASURE.
>
> voiceI = \notes {
> \time 2/4
> d''16 a'16 fis'16 a'16 d'16 d''16 c''16 d''16 |
> b'8 g'8 r16 g''16 f''16 g''16 |
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Currently the default behavior for \key is to put the key
> change before the barline. I'm quite sure however that the
> correct notation is to have the key change after the
> barline.
>
> Yes, I know I can shift the barline and the key signature.
> But shouldn't the de
--- Begin Message ---
Currently the default behavior for \key is to put the key
change before the barline. I'm quite sure however that the
correct notation is to have the key change after the
barline.
Yes, I know I can shift the barline and the key signature.
But shouldn't the default behavior be
Thanks I am just not sure where to tell lilypond to use babel or ivritex
etc.
When I add it to the start of the lyrics
with a doubled backslash as per lilypond I get the command in english in
the resulting dvi or ps.
\\hebalef
under the staff.
I was told to double the \\ and quote the foriegn lan
Hi,
You explained I can add latex to the lyrics.
Well how I need to do something like this:
}
text = \context Lyrics \lyrics {
this is a test for you and me to see
\\sethebrew "heregoes the hebrew" \\unsethebrew }
Staff1Staff = \context Staff = Staff1Staff <
\Staff1
>
I need to add s
Title: Eservis.gen.tr Sanal reklam Merkezi , E-mail List
Kendi
Reklamınızı Kendiniz Yapın!
Düşük
maliyet ve sınırsız kullanım...
KONTROLÜ
ELİNİZE ALIN..!
E-mail
gönderemiyorum problemlerine s
HWN> Also, keep in mind that we're freezing 1.8, so I will try to ignore
HWN> any feature requests that also weren't working in 1.6. The idea is
HWN> that we can release 1.8 when the doco is complete, and it doesn't any
HWN> bugs relative to 1.6.
It's just that I've been using Lilypond quite inte
Hi Aaron,
the answer is easy:
> %5 a'4 b'4 a'4 |
The percent sign introduces a comment. Anything from the percent sign to the
end of the line is ignored.
If you want to mark up the bar numbers in your input, do it the reverse way
around:
a'4 b' a' | %5
that works.
All the
Aaron wrote:
After checking more carefully I see a number of measures are missing.
Here is the complete song, Help please.
Thanks,
Aaron
[snip]
%5 a'4 b'4 a'4 |
a'4 b'4 a'4 |
[snip]
% disables the rest of the line. So, the first line above is ignored
completely.
This should work:
After checking more carefully I see a number of measures are missing.
Here is the complete song, Help please.
Thanks,
Aaron
blanknotes = {
\property Voice.NoteHead \override
#'transparent = ##t
\property Voice.Stem \override
#'transparent = ##t
}
unblanknotes = {\property Voice
Hi all,
I am notating a song which has two measures repeated. The ps output only
prints one of the two measures:
a'4 b'4 a'4 |
a'4 b'4 a'4 |
I thought that maybe adding note values to all would help but no matter
what I do, only one measure appears
Thanks
Aaron
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 02:53:19 +0200
> J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I understand that you have fast plans to release the next
> > stable version, Dr. Han-Wen & Mr. Nieuwenhuizen, I'm wondering
> > if I am allowed to do a round of complaining (all in good fun
> > of
23 matches
Mail list logo
