On 07.12.2009, at 16:35, Peter Dingley wrote:
I was searching for a way to print out midi elapsed time
in my score to be able to easily start the midi file
at the location I am currently working on. At the moment
I write these in by hand but they change as I
make changes to the music in other
On 07.12.2009, at 16:35, Peter Dingley wrote:
I was searching for a way to print out midi elapsed time
in my score to be able to easily start the midi file
at the location I am currently working on. At the moment
I write these in by hand but they change as I
make changes to the music in other
On 15.12.2009, at 10:00, Mark Polesky wrote:
In NR 1.1.1 "Writing pitches" -- Relative octave entry,
"it is recommended that [startpitch] be an octave of c."
Why? Most of the time it won't even be the "startpitch".
Perhaps "referencepitch" is more accurate, but what's wrong
with "\relative fi
In checking the regressions, I've come across some issues. And, sorry
for posting these all in one go, but I've just been saving them up
until one day I could post a massive email and have the bug tracker
explode with new regression issues.
Regressions:
page-label.ly:
line 35: \mark \marku
On 24.12.2009, at 23:57, Joe Neeman wrote:
profile-property-access.ly errors and fails when I try to compile it.
Additionally, the properties shown in the output are all 0
You need to configure with --disable-optimising in order for property
access profiling to work.
Okay, since I can't com
Are the ottava symbols an intentional omission from tabFullNotation?
I couldn't find any documentation on the function.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Are the ottava symbols an intentional omission from tabFullNotation?
I couldn't find any documentation on the function.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 26.12.2009, at 13:38, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Trevor Daniels wrote Saturday, December 26, 2009 12:24 PM
James Bailey wrote Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:51 AM
Are the ottava symbols an intentional omission from
tabFullNotation? I couldn't find any documentation on the function.
N
looks alright here on osx 10.4, intel
On 31.12.2009, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
Yet more architectural changes to GUB, so I thought it'd be worth
hearing if it works. lilypad should be included automatically now.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Cheers,
- Graham
__
The regression tests for input/regression/tuplet-text*.ly have a
version statement of 2.12.3, although they don't compile with 2.12.3,
and these tests were not included in 2.12.3.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.
On 02.01.2010, at 00:20, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 03:27:48PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
The regression tests for input/regression/tuplet-text*.ly have a
version
statement of 2.12.3, although they don't compile with 2.12.3, and
these
tests were not included in 2
On 16.01.2010, at 18:04, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Mark Polesky
wrote:
A while back I proposed the name "lilypatch" for what is now
"lily-git". I didn't hear any response so I suppose that
most of you prefer the current name. I thought I'd mention
it once more
On 08.02.2010, at 14:02, David Kastrup wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
I don't think that this is useful advice since binaries often are
incompatible with Scheme/Lilypond trees of other versions, and
since
many regressions are not in
So, when I'm not doing lilypond things, I test stuff. I'm a game
tester. One thing I find very helpful is to have a short list of
things to check for when doing these kinds of quick version test. I
haven't really worked very hard on it, but here's kinda the things I
do so far when looking
On 12.02.2010, at 20:37, James Bailey wrote:
…
lilypond-book --latex-program=pdflatex --pdf -o out pdflatex-lily-
book-sample.lytex
should have been:
lilypond-book --pdf -o out pdflatex-lily-book-sample.lytex
…old file version…
___
lilypond
In the 2.13 docs, AU 4.2 Text editor support. The last link,
Alternate editors goes to a 404 not found.___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
As I understand it, the critical problems previously had with
lilypond on 10.5 (and now 10.6) have been resolved. And since the
issue was just raised on the -user list. Would it be useful now to
simply have the PPC/Intel binaries (labeled as such)?
_
On 23.02.2010, at 02:18, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:31:37PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
As I understand it, the critical problems previously had with
lilypond on
10.5 (and now 10.6) have been resolved. And since the issue was just
raised on the -user list. Would it be
On 23.02.2010, at 02:18, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:31:37PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
As I understand it, the critical problems previously had with
lilypond on
10.5 (and now 10.6) have been resolved. And since the issue was just
raised on the -user list. Would it be
On 23.02.2010, at 21:57, Patrick McCarty wrote:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;h=refs/
heads/web;hb=web
I would rather spend my LilyPond time on other issues, or else I would
fix it myself.
I don't know how to fix this, or any other issues, otherwise I would
d
On 24.02.2010, at 00:25, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:05 PM, James Bailey
wrote:
On 23.02.2010, at 21:57, Patrick McCarty wrote:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;h=refs/
heads/web;hb=web
I would rather spend my LilyPond time on other issues
On 24.02.2010, at 02:10, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On 2010-02-24, James Bailey wrote:
For the 2.12 file:
197-215
Could be removed
238 MacOS X (G3, G4, G5 Macs)
Could be changed to Mac OS X PPC
For the 2.13 one:
165 -184
could be removed
209 MacOS X (G3, G4, G5 Macs)
Could be
On 05.03.2010, at 16:27, James Lowe wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:10 PM, James Lowe
wrote:
In fact cli doesn't work for me on Mac OS - in a terminal I just
get the
switch list displayed for lilypond when I run ANY command in
Terminal, but I
also got this in 2
On 05.03.2010, at 16:27, James Lowe wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:10 PM, James Lowe
wrote:
In fact cli doesn't work for me on Mac OS - in a terminal I just
get the
switch list displayed for lilypond when I run ANY command in
Terminal, but I
also got this in 2
Currently, the instructions on getting LilyPond up and running in a
terminal on mac osx have the user create a script which calls the
lilypond application, and then add the location of the script to the
$PATH. Is there any advantage of this over just having the user add
the location of the
On 07.03.2010, at 15:27, James Lowe wrote:
For those who read this and use Mac OS (and care) using the default
guest account will work if you don't turn on Parental controls/
allow all apps to work - even if you put Lilypond.app or Terminal
in your prefs for guest, I couldn't get permissions
On 09.03.2010, at 11:59, James Lowe wrote:
however I noticed that when I did an echo $PATH to see if what I
had done was working, I noticed that I had a path to Macports. Now
I KNOW that I wouldn't have added that, so I wondered as the
installer is just a zip file where we drag and drop the
On 16.03.2010, at 18:02, David Kastrup wrote:
Mark Polesky writes:
Carl Sorensen wrote:
I'm OK with that, but I still have the concern of
documenting it. What do we need to do to make sure that
the documentation works properly?
I don't think it's worth it. There are too many
documentati
While probably not directly related, would something like this affect
a bug I haven't gotten around to adding to the tracker? See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-03/msg00508.html
and
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-12/msg00507.html
On 04.04.2010, at 11:4
I realize that downloading and reading the documentation offline is
not for everyone, but is there a way to make a documentation for
download that isn't so large? Looking at it, the size increased more
than 30 MB between 2.13.1 and 2.13.2. I don't know usually work with
the unstable docs, b
On 07.05.2010, at 21:53, David Kastrup wrote:
"Boris Shingarov" writes:
Hi David,
for theoretical work it often is necessary to write several short
systems in one line, interspersed with text.
This is exactly what we are doing.
I don't manage to have
a) new systems continue aligned to t
On 03.06.2010, at 22:00, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 6/3/10 1:52 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
Hi Bug Squad and others,
I've updated CG 7 Issues:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/issues
Looks very good to me.
I do have one question -- do we ever want to push original
On 27.05.2010, at 19:58, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 5/27/10 11:53 AM, "James Lowe" wrote:
Hello
Carl Sorensen wrote:
Here's a patch, from Hraban as modified by Neil, that allows
printing minor
chords with lower-case names, instead of with a "m" suffix.
Please review:
http://codereview.
On 05.06.2010, at 11:48, Graham Percival wrote:
Hi Bug Squad and others,
I've updated CG 7 Issues:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/contributor/issues.html
Note that this URL goes to kainhofer; the official online docs
won't be updated until 2.13.24, and it's too early for that.
So, I was reading through the changes to vocal music, and I had an epiphany.
The current solution for lyrics independent of notes is predicated on the idea
that the lyrics should be attached to some voice. Since \lyricmode just tells
lilypond that the entry will be text rather than notes, why no
So, I was reading through the changes to vocal music, and I had an epiphany.
The current solution for lyrics independent of notes is predicated on the idea
that the lyrics should be attached to some voice. Since \lyricmode just tells
lilypond that the entry will be text rather than notes, why no
On Sep 12, 2010, at 6:40 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> As far as I can tell, no regressions. The only major change is in
> metronome-marking-break-align.ly where the mark is now quite a bit further to
> the right. However, it doesn't look bad and so could well be a tweak to
> http://code.google.c
On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:21 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 9/21/10 4:51 PM, "Dénes Harmath" wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> when trying to build LilyPond on OSX 10.6.4, I get the following error:
>>
>> /Users/thsoft/Development/lilypond/scripts/build/out/help2man
>> out/lilypond-invoke-editor > out/lil
These are just some things that I noticed.
2.1.1 Entering Lyrics.
Lyrics are entered in a special input mode, which can be introduced by
the keyword \lyricmode, or by using \addlyrics or \lyricsto. In this mode…
Which mode? This has bugged me for a while, and since changes are being ma
On Dec 10, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I've downloaded and installed LilyBuntu and I've got the source with git, so
> I'm looking for a simple regtest to improve, to practice.
>
> I've come across accidental-unbroken-tie-spacing.ly
>
> To me, there are a number of errors. Apart fro
What does the description for context-die-staff.ly mean?
\version "2.12.0"
\header {
texidoc = "a staff should die if there is reference to it."
}
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
line-width = 2.5 \cm
indent = 0.0
}
{
<< \new Staff = "q" \new Voice ="V" c1 >>
%% no \break, BreakEvent ca
In the instructions for lily-git for other operating systems, the last step is
to "Go read the lilybuntu instructions, starting from the “get source” step."
I didn't find this step. I realize the lilybuntu section is currently being
re-worked, which is why I think it's probably a good time to men
On Dec 20, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 06:01:07PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
>> In the instructions for lily-git for other operating systems,
>
> I'm seriously considering deleting those entirely. At least,
> *something* needs
On Dec 23, 2010, at 5:21 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> PS virtually nobody runs "make install", and I certainly wouldn't
> expect a new contributor to do this. The only people running
> "make install" should be linux package creators, and extremely
> advanced users who are both very familiar wi
On Dec 27, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> Got it. One thing that has always peeved me is the default sort order of
>> oldest first. Would there be objections if I tried to change this to newest
>> first? It seems to be pos
Compiling this with 2.12.3 and 2.13.45 yields (to my eye) rather different
results. I personally cannot tell if the systems are horizontally stretched or
not. They appear to be centered. Or should this illustrate that only the
systems on the first page are vertically stretched? Regardless, in 2.
On Dec 30, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi,
>
> didn't find it in the tracker so i report:
> optical spacing doesn't work as expected in the following situation:
>
> \version "2.13.43"
> \new Score {
> \repeat unfold 12 { c''16 [ d'' b' c'' ] \noBreak }
> }
>
> All 16ths are
On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 1/13/11 2:16 PM, "Janek Warchoł"
> wrote:
>>
>> The distances are not equal. Optical corrections are made there.
>>
> OK, you got me interested so I spent some time I didn't have on this. I
> must be a LilyPond addict.
>
> It appears th
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>> 2011/1/19 Mike Solomon :
>>> It may be worth it to add this to the issue tracker and get this fixed in
>>> one of the first 2.14 bug fixes (if not 2.14 itself) - thoughts?
>>
>
49 matches
Mail list logo
