Re: PATCH: Doc: Added @seealso to Ancient.itely as part of starting 1287

Hello, On 06/12/2010 13:44, Carl Sorensen wrote: Create a new branch with the second change, and do git-cl upload from the second branch. That's a bit beyond me. :( However is it easy to remove the addition to the wrong patch from Rietveld?

PATCH: Doc: Added @seealso to Ancient.itely as part of starting 1287 (second attempt)

This for http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1287 Initial patch made and uploaded. http://codereview.appspot.com/3473042 James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond

Re: PATCH: Doc: Added @seealso to Ancient.itely as part of starting 1287

git branch -f newbranch git checkout newbranch git-cl upload HEAD^ Thanks that worked. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: PATCH: Doc: Added @seealso to Ancient.itely as part of starting 1287

Graham, On 06/12/2010 13:59, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, James wrote: I was hoping this would give a new patch not add to the existing. Finish the existing one first. Wait until it's been pushed. If necessary, remind people that you're waiting f

Re: PATCH: Doc: Added @seealso to Ancient.itely as part of starting 1287 (second attempt)

I have deleted this because I got myself in a bit of a twist with git cl and branches. Sorry for wasting anyone's time. I will repost a new patch (probabuy tomorrow now). James On 06/12/2010 14:04, James wrote: This for http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1287 In

Re: PATCH: Doc: Added @seealso to Ancient.itely as part of starting 1287

patch set". Click on it, confirm, and you're done. Done, thanks Carl. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

PATCH: removal of all 'fragment' instances in the @Lilypond examples

Hello, Anymore for anymore? Is this ok to go? http://codereview.appspot.com/3369041/ Thanks James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Doc: CG: clarify lily-git.tcl and git-cl. (issue3396042)

didn't have the same permissions as using my 'gmail' account. They are NOT always the same. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Odd Warning when compiling doc this morning - breaks compile

mentation' make[1]: *** [WWW-2] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jlowe/lilypond-git' make: *** [doc] Error 2 jl...@jlowenetbuntu:~/lilypond-git$ -- James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Odd Warning when compiling doc this morning - breaks compile

Hello (again).. On 08/12/2010 11:45, James wrote: Hello, I've done a fresh git pull this morning and a make ; make doc and during compile I got the error message ... I redid the make ; make doc and didn't get the message, things compile ok now. I am now wondering if I simply

Re: LilyBuntu [don't read kainhofer.com!]

e needs any advice or help and I also helped with the CG in parts on this too. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

LSR down?

Can't seem to hit it from 'here' James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

PATCH: Doc: Various to LM and NR additions from lilypond-user email threads

Hello, http://codereview.appspot.com/3581041/ Have a good weekend. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: lilybuntu 2

o and installed in a VM for testing, all that's left is to test the doc-build in the VM. Let me know where I can get this .iso and I can kick of the Doc build today. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.o

Re: lilybuntu 2

On 13/12/2010 15:59, Jonathan Kulp wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:53 AM, James wrote: On 13/12/2010 15:39, Jonathan Kulp wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote: With that in mind, does anybody feel like cooking up lilybuntu 2 right now? I recommend - Ubuntu 10.04

Re: lilybuntu 2

On 13/12/2010 16:06, Graham Percival wrote: I think it ended up on Valentin's server. Cheers, - Graham Seems both Phil's and my link work :) I've only ever used http://prodet.hu/bert/lilydev/lilybuntu.iso Regards James ___

Re: lilybuntu 2

Hello, On 15/12/2010 11:11, Jonathan Kulp wrote: If you want to test it, please feel free Feeling free right now! Will let you know if I get any issues after today (assume no news is good news!). Thanks for doing this Jonathan. James

Re: DocBuild fails

rce (apart from your own local-not-yet-pushed-changes)? James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: DocBuild fails

Jonathan On 15/12/2010 13:19, Jonathan Kulp wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:40 AM, James wrote: Doc build is failing since yesterday evening for me. It built in w/o errors in the morning. I've built my doc with no issues, but it depends on what you call 'yesterday evening'

Re: lilybuntu 2

hello, On 15/12/2010 14:58, Graham Percival wrote: With that in mind, could James (continue) to test it, making sure that he looks at the docs in current git rather than relying on his own knowledge? The iso is now downloaded. I'll look at the CG in Git (once I can compile the docs

Re: issue classification: priority guidelines

Janek On 15/12/2010 15:32, Janek Warchoł wrote: but i struggle with unbelieveably low VirtualBox resolution - 800x600, it annoys me extremely on my big monitor. Maybe i'll find an answer on the web Look in the help. 9.6. Advanced display configuration

Re: lilybuntu 2

another button to 'compile (doc) for the first time' It could run ./autogen.sh and then make ; make doc. I rarely make install personally. But thanks again Jonathan! James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lis

PATCH: Doc: More NR and LM additions based on user emails

sending this request out manually this time round. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: lilybuntu 2 and new CG 2 quick start

I never create a 'build' dir. I simply cd lilypond-git ./autogen.sh make make doc make a cup of tea. Is there a reason we are advocating an extra mkdir ../build/configure/.. step? or have been doing it wrong all this time %^) --- James ___

PATCH: Doc: Add more @seealso to Ancient Notation in NR

Hello, I don't know why but Rietveld is not sending my emails to dev when I add it to the CC: during the git-cl upload. More Ancient.itely additions for @seealso http://codereview.appspot.com/3792041/ James ___ lilypond-devel mailing

Problem running patchy this morning

pull normally in $LILYPOND_GIT so am not sure what is going on. Haven't been able to test this patch this morning. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Website broken link?

exist. Please could someone try to reproduce this. Yes I can reproduce this too. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Deprecated command during lilypond-book / doc build

Hello, Just an FYI for those that understand this stuff: I notice a warning during make doc --snip-- /home/james/lilypond-git/build/python/out/book_snippets.py:744: DeprecationWarning: os.popen3 is deprecated. Use the subprocess module. (stdin, stdout, stderr) = os.popen3 (cmd) --snip

Test Patchy problem on issue 2744

Hello, Trying 2744 this morning: --snip-- Trying issue 2744 Problem with urls: ['<URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/5440084#msg21>;', 'http://codereview.appspot.com/6443122'] Something went wrong; omitting patch for issue 2744 No new patches to test james@jameslily

Re: PATCHY users: please update

g issue 2745 Found patch: (2745, '/home/james/patchy/patches/issue6450128_1.diff', 'clef change confuses manual key signature') Trying issue 2726 Found patch: (2726, '/home/james/patchy/patches/issue6454121_12002.diff', 'Patch: Regtest changes phase 1')

Re: PATCHY users: please update

Hello On 15 August 2012 01:00, John Mandereau wrote: > Le mardi 14 août 2012 à 13:58 +0100, James a écrit : >> The last two checkins break something. >> >> --snip-- >> line 184, in make_directories >> run ("git branch -f test-%s %s/master" % (

Re: PATCHY users: please update

John, On 15 August 2012 01:00, John Mandereau wrote: > Le mardi 14 août 2012 à 13:58 +0100, James a écrit : >> The last two checkins break something. >> >> --snip-- >> line 184, in make_directories >> run ("git branch -f test-%s %s/master" % (

Re: Tidies binary relocation (issue 6463066)

;> couldn't find it, though. It might even be involved in the >> lilypond jail settings (i.e. for LSR). (and note that unless you >> have personally set up a working LSR, do not assume that the docs >> on lilypond jail actually work!) > > I did the same. It&#

Patchy switches for forcing make doc don't seem to work

one can verify it 'WORKSFORME' then I'll take another look. It would mean I could make doc on every patch that needs testing, to give people like Trevor more confidence when their patches are tested. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list l

Re: Patchy switches for forcing make doc don't seem to work

John, On 20 August 2012 13:09, John Mandereau wrote: > Hi James, > Il giorno lun, 20/08/2012 alle 10.40 +0100, James ha scritto: >> I am not able to work out how to force patchy during a test-patches.py >> to also make doc as well as the test and test-baseline. >> >

Re: Patchy switches for forcing make doc don't seem to work

John, On 20 August 2012 14:28, John Mandereau wrote: > Il giorno lun, 20/08/2012 alle 13.53 +0100, James ha scritto: >> On 20 August 2012 13:09, John Mandereau wrote: >> > If you mean the BUILD_ALL_DOCS switch in the core code of the builder >> > (patches/compil

Re: Patchy switches for forcing make doc don't seem to work

John, On 20 August 2012 16:32, John Mandereau wrote: > Il giorno lun, 20/08/2012 alle 15.53 +0100, James ha scritto: >> What might be more convenient - depending on the approach - is to be >> able to arbitrarily run ./test-patchy.py at a tracker issue regardless >> of patch

Re: Patchy switches for forcing make doc don't seem to work

turn it off and on as needed for now. Now that I know where to make the change. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Patchy test doesn't like '<...>' enclosing issue tracker links

That's all. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email

John, On 26 August 2012 11:39, John Mandereau wrote: > Hi James, >> 09:24:02 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at >> d14e4770b85b3cacc647e45b9ebfe59cc085753f >> 09:24:07 Merged staging, now at: >> d14e4770b85b3cacc647e45b9ebfe59cc085753f

After many changes to Patchy - problems on testing (for me anyway)

might have during the day but won't be able to test anything until I get back tonight. Regards James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: After many changes to Patchy - problems on testing (for me anyway)

John On 27 August 2012 08:30, James wrote: > John, > > On 26 August 2012 16:37, John Mandereau wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> After lots of testing, debugging, and commits editions cycles, I've >> pushed many changes to Patchy in lilypond-extra master branc

Re: automated computing tasks for lilypond

#x27;s no reason why I couldn't allow ssh access via a terminal session, I just haven't bothered to figure out how to set up port forwarding on the router properly yet. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: automated computing tasks for lilypond

Hello, On 28 August 2012 10:52, David Kastrup wrote: > James writes: > >> Hello, >> >> On 28 August 2012 08:17, Graham Percival wrote: >>> Let's make a list of tasks we want, then make sure that we're >>> doing them on sensible computers. &

Re: successful GUB build on my LilyDev (2.6)

as I am not sure what GUB hackers like Phil and Graham use (maybe 10.04?). James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: successful GUB build on my LilyDev (2.6)

machine) and I could guarantee a clean make test each time. i am sure there are other methods that snapshots can be used for, as long as you have the disk space and reasonable amounts of RAM, I think it's a nice way to develop. Oh and it helps when testing new LilyDevs. James _

Re: successful GUB build on my LilyDev (2.6)

Hello, On 28 August 2012 20:41, Graham Percival wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:24:09PM +0100, James wrote: >> I have been trying to see about cutting a new LilyDev (2.7) on 12.04 - >> the limitation being whatever remastersys backup is supported on - >> when I last lo

Re: automated computing tasks for lilypond

Hello, On 29 August 2012 13:26, Graham Percival wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:44:17AM +0100, James wrote: >> On 28 August 2012 08:17, Graham Percival wrote: >> > - Patchy staging-merge: powerful computer, no fixed internet >> > connection. Every 6 hours? >

Re: automated computing tasks for lilypond

Hello, On 29 August 2012 14:03, John Mandereau wrote: > Hi Graham , James and LilyPond folks, > Il giorno mer, 29/08/2012 alle 13.26 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto: >> John, could you disable staging-merge on Grenouille? that should >> free up some computing resources f

Re: automated computing tasks for lilypond

Hello On 29 August 2012 14:19, Graham Percival wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 02:09:43PM +0100, James wrote: >> Just an off-the-cuff suggestion. If we had a 'patch-new-doc' and a >> 'patch-new' label would that be useful and tell patchy if it sees the &g

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2790 in lilypond: Patch: bar-line interface part 2/2

do > > cycle; even > > make doc > > succeds. Any hints where these errors come from? Sorry for not making myself more clear, these are shown in the actual reg tests themselves. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: automated computing tasks for lilypond

rs from now-ish) and then will run it manually when I get back from work tomorrow evening and hopefully have more time to work out the kinks with this email business. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: automated computing tasks for lilypond

John, On 30 August 2012 08:08, John Mandereau wrote: > Il giorno mer, 29/08/2012 alle 22.52 +0100, James ha scritto: >> OK I have set up all the push access and done a test and it seems to >> work, I cannot yet get it to send the email.. hmm.. probably some >> silly typo s

Re: Fw: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2547 in lilypond: Fix documentation of making footnotes work via tweak.

Hello, On 31 August 2012 14:09, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:54:11PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: >> Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 13.21 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto: >> > People like James can build new test results quite quickly, >> &

Re: Fw: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2547 in lilypond: Fix documentation of making footnotes work via tweak.

John, On 31 August 2012 22:35, John Mandereau wrote: > Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 18.43 +0100, James ha scritto: >> I'll need to double check remember that I post links to zipped files. >> I never checked the size of the show- regtest dir that gets >> cre

When updating the tracker not using git-cl for patch-new tests

own in a comment, it's because test-patchy cannot parse the comment before it properly. Thanks James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Trying to work out at what point patchy fails during make test

does the list get appended to before each test? This used to be a bit easier IIRC to find the offending file, but that may be me out of Patchy practice. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Grenouille is giving false reg tests

See http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2811 Compare mine to its. You'll see programming errors - which seem to appear on all the other recent patch tests. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: Grenouille is giving false reg tests

John, On 6 September 2012 09:29, John Mandereau wrote: > Hi James, > Il giorno mer, 05/09/2012 alle 23.13 +0100, James ha scritto: >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2811 >> >> Compare mine to its. >> >> You'll see programming error

Re: osx 10.7 support

ter. > > You mean staging. > >> sending this to -devel instead of bug- because we really don't >> need the normal bug infrastructure for this. Done: --snip-- author James Lowe Sun, 9 Sep 2012 13:58:06 + (14:58 +0100) committer

Re: How to change the patch description for the issue tracker?

o just re-edit the original commit message and that's all you need to do. When you use git-cl it also gives you an additional line to enter 'describe this patch set' which is what is added to the Rietveld Patch set on the google.code website. James _

Re: Minor release checklist

as nothing to do with GUB but the 'default' (if you use LilyGit.tcl) to download the git repo is --snip-- [remote "origin"] fetch = +refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master ... --snip-- The wildcard is always added manually (at l

Re: What do \[ and \] do?

tyle note\[ ... note\].' Actually they are only documented for Ancient Music as far as I can tell. Also in Appendix C of the LilyPond Grammar in the NR --snip-- 332 command_element: command_event 333| "\[" 334| "\]" 335

Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint

S] - alternative viewpoint >> >> >>> "Phil Holmes" writes: >>> >>>> And getting rid of case-sensitivity in a lot of this? >>> >> >> >> \new Staff works. \New staff doesn't. There's no reason for that - [user-n

Re: Replacement for backend function bezier-sandwich

diff;h=35725a573e47be7c02c51964641ea534fb88be6b Does this help? james ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Broken time signature glyphs?

fontforge version check number in the > configure script? > ? It already is isn't it? config.in from latest master (although this was added weeks ago I think) --snip-- STEPMAKE_PATH_PROG(FONTFORGE, fontforge, REQUIRED, 20110222) --snip-- James

Patchy been having network issues

Hello, I've been having intermittent Broadband disconnects since late evening and they were running into this morning. So if it appears that staging is not getting merged, don't panic it will eventually - I set Patchy on a 4 hour cycle this morning before I left for wo

Re: [GLISS] Existing syntax abominations

ave that right, that this kind of change would be better for 'me' (as a user) as I now think of thinks in 'container' (or blocks I guess) and this is just a \repeat { } block, James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Apparently the amd64 build of LilyPond 2.16.0 failed on Ubuntu

ames--4642696709202227756.log make[2]: *** [out-test/html-include-space-after-tag.html] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/lilypond-2.16.0/input/regression/lilypond-book' make[1]: *** [test] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/lily

Re: Apparently the amd64 build of LilyPond 2.16.0 failed on Ubuntu

ins be in this build? As you needed an extra font package installed from the 'standard' _after_ that was added - I can only comment on what I build myself with Patchy. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Doc: document \time command fully (2807) (issue 6532055)

((1 . 8) . (2 2 2 2)) ))) } and http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=523 (although the snippet says in the code itself 'which will work with >="2.15.19"." James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: GOP2-5 - ly language discussions

e devs list) can appreciate or be able to comment is when we're presented with before/after 'output' (either graphically or as in Mikes slur stuff, as comparison times - quicker is better right?), it's just all a bit abstract for many of us. The only

Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint

#x27;t always the case. The later footnote syntax was a case in point (I think) where we did change the syntax significantly enough that the old documentation would have been incorrect as opposed to incomplete/missing, we couldn't really push that on the users until had had been documented. Ja

Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y"

title = \markup { \override #'(font-name . "Palatino") \abs-fontsize #24 "This is My Tune" } couldn't we do something similar with \tempo in that we simply ('simply'!) have a 'top level' \tempo command and then whatever we need to specify if it needs a markup and/or a timing? \tempo { \markup { some value } \bpm {another value} \metronome_mark {yet another value} } or something like that ... Sorry if I have missed a point. james ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint

it should go - this saves me a lot of time. The hardest thing to come up with are 'good' lilypond examples - indeed the footnote documentation in the NR (initially) was spawned from Mikes own reg tests, that is better than nothing. James _

Re: [talk] Today's xkcd comic...

On 24 September 2012 13:00, David Kastrup wrote: > > Seemed too fitting somehow to pass up. > > http://xkcd.com/1112/> > > -- > David Kastrup Is that you on the right? ;) James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lily

Re: [talk] easy tuplets

On 25 September 2012 16:49, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 25/09/12 06:48, Keith OHara wrote: >> >> Try it out. Enter some Debussy using 12th-notes, 9th notes, etc. >> > > > If nested tuplets are your intended testing

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

ide bend of a tick mark. But that's beside the point though right? :) I mean I couldn't ever envisage half the stuff that others seem to require before I joined the LilyPond dev lists. I guess the point here is if you have 2 points of reference it makes it more flexible to align tha

Syntax clarification/change/improvement for -d[value]

arty' so to speak and apply it, it needs it first hand. Failing all that, what about removing the '=' altogether make it an invalid syntax and just stick wth -dxxx James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Patch-testing-problem

Hello, On 28 September 2012 21:24, Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to test Marc's bar-line-patch somewhat closer, but I have a > problem, not knowing what to do. > > I did (because I don't know what went wrong I post every detail): > > 1. Downloaded the patch from Rietveld and stored it i

Recent LSR + Tarball checkin

Hello, I noticed that one of the changes in one of the snippets shows - \consists "Mark_engraver" + \consists Mark_engraver \consists "Staff_collecting_engraver" Is there a significance/preference using q

Re: Patch-testing-problem

Why do you think you did something wrong? That was exactly what I got when I tested the patch originally. You need to find the problem of why it failed to compile. See http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2790#c33 Did you get the same problem? > > Do you have another

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

;> #"scripts.caesura.straight"} > > Hmm. I wouldn't do it this way, How would you do it? James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Patch-testing-problem

ing log file *will* contain the error message (as if you had run lilypond-book on the individual snippet) Hence my comment --snip-- lily-7dccbf09.log:programming error: number of pages is out of bounds lily-7dccbf09.log:programming error: tried to space systems on a bad number of pages lily-7dccbf

lilypond 2.16.0 and Windows 8 (enterprise)

http://lilypond.org/windows.html accordingly Regards James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: [GLISS] turn xxx.yyy into ("xxx" "yyy")

which one a user picks, they will work, then fine, but sometimes too much choice or rather, too much opportunity to 'type it wrong' may lead to frustration or incomprehensibility if we report a technically accurate but hard-to-understand error message. Also, won't anyone think of the IDEs!

Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - was [talk] easy tuplets

'tupelets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuplet Am I missing something Ian (if so, sorry)? James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: [talk] why it'd be great to have web interface for submitting simple doc patches

stand it. I think you have proven your own point when you say > Also, several times when i asked users for such suggestions they were > very vague And being vague in an email vs vague on a website is different how? > and i couldn't just copy-and-paste them (and i didn't have &

Re: [talk] why it'd be great to have web interface for submitting simple doc patches

Hello, On 6 October 2012 15:23, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 10/06/2012 11:34 AM, James wrote: >> >> How is a web interface easier than email to enter information? > > > Well, the problem with simple doc patches is that to submit them to Lilypond > you

Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - was [talk] easy tuplets

Ian, On 6 October 2012 16:40, Ian Hulin wrote: > On 05/10/12 08:10, James wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 5 October 2012 00:19, Ian Hulin wrote: >>> This is a proposal to move the triplet/tuplet discussion forward. >>> >>> There will be new co

Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - was [talk] easy tuplets

Hello, On 8 October 2012 14:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 10/08/2012 01:29 PM, James wrote: >> >> I have the good fortune to play with >> semi-professionals and also teachers who when I queried said [I >> paraphrase], well sure I guess you could technically

Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list

N that we use already for DIRECTION (slurs, cues etc.)? I don't really follow technically the conversation that lead to David's comment of 'X-offset anyone?' but would this be an alternative? James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece

David, that I have a bit of a grasp on these subtleties but am not a programmer to know how to articulate these important functions to non-programmers. Examples, at least _good_ examples of @lilyponds are what helps. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: stepping down as project manager

override/revert such that the user is comfortable > _not_ being familiar with them while at the same time having access to > the advanced information should he ever need it. It is not a must-learn > item, but a good-to-know-occasionally one. So I don't see any harm in keeping it simple in the Learning Manual but 'getting down and dirty' technically in the NR with an @ref back to the LM. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

No Internet connection

Hello, My apologies for not running patchy in the last couple of days, but I am not currently able to connect to the internet from home as there is a problem with my telephone exchange. I have not been given any e.t.a for a fix. Sorry for any inconvenience. James PS I'm also sorry fo

Re: svg output

SVG what about PDF readers? I'm rather sceptical about SVG output only that we do get occasionally gripes about LilyPond SVG output and Inkscape (for example), implying that our SVG backend (or whatever it is) is not 100% perfect, at least PNGs are 'just' images. James ___

Re: reformatted GNUmakefile pushed to staging

as been merged yet). I have to go out for a few hours now, so let me know and I can either kick of a merge immediately when I get back or put it back on my normal 2 hour cycle. james ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: glossary - add 'high bass clef'

Arnold I think this might be better on dev list than bug so I am ccing dev in case you are not subscribed to that list yet. On 23 October 2012 12:54, ArnoldTheresius wrote: > James wrote >> Hello, >> >> ... >> >> Well I have applied this patch and I am not

Re: CG: fixed wrong link to Contact

lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > This passes a make doc - I checked just in case - I see no reason why you cannot just push this one char change directly to staging. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.

Re: lilypond 2.16.0 and Windows 8 (enterprise)

Hello, On 3 October 2012 07:54, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, James wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Just an FYI, I was able to download install and run LP's test file >> with no problems, on Windows 8.x (Enterprise Edition), I am not sure >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >