John, On 6 September 2012 09:29, John Mandereau <john.mander...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi James, > Il giorno mer, 05/09/2012 alle 23.13 +0100, James ha scritto: >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2811 >> >> Compare mine to its. >> >> You'll see programming errors - which seem to appear on all the other >> recent patch tests. > > IIRC these programming errors about undead objects have always appeared > on Grenouille, so they should be ignored. Of course, regtests > comparisons crippled with so much errors not related to the tested patch > are quite cumbersome to examine.
It's more than that, we really did have a few patches with 'programming error' messages from other developers, so while there is any doubt I end up having to redo the tests anyway, which kind of makes the reg test on Grenouille pointless at the moment. As I won't know if this is a real problem or not. > I really want to give testers like you > the ability to upload regtests comparions to Grenouille, but as I'm > moving to Italy and I was in a hurry for other tasks I've had no time > for LilyPond in the past ten days except reading the long threads about > syntax and working on adding debugging hooks to GUB. I hope to have > some time for hacking Patchy on Sunday. I'd suggest turning it off for now and I'll continue to test patches manually. James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
