Reviewers: J_lowe, jan.nieuwenhuizen,
Message:
On 2011/11/11 06:48:28, jan.nieuwenhuizen wrote:
On 2011/11/10 20:07:34, J_lowe wrote:
> Passes make and no reg test diffs
+// Modified to omit demangling, filter through c++filt -t instead
Please, do not add changelogs to source files; we hav
On 2011-11-11 09:31, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Remember that yaffut is a cross platform test suite, are things
like c++filt available for MSVC, for example?
Huh? What concern are the platforms yaffut runs on? Don't tell me that
Lilypond is one of its main distribution points. If it is, so much the
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> On 2011-11-11 09:31, d...@gnu.org wrote:
>>> Remember that yaffut is a cross platform test suite, are things
>>> like c++filt available for MSVC, for example?
>>
>> Huh? What concern are the platforms yaffut runs on? Don't tell me that
>> Lilypond is one of its main
David Kastrup writes:
> Issue 1875.
Ah, that's the bit I missed. Just an artifact of our non-integrated
SCM/Bug-tracker/Patch tracker.
> The patch in its current state does not affect a working test suite, and
> it lets "make check" finish with slightly less readable output when
> cxxabi.h brea
Hello,
I would like to make a project for my school with the free software
lilypond.
I would like to make it online. With html, php, javascript, etc.. the user
could write is code in a text area
and with a "actualise" button, could see the partition on the right size.
I know the C, C# and C++ l
Hello,
Sorry if I 'missed a memo' but when I look at
http://wiki.lilynet.net/
I get
MediaWiki 1.16.5
To complete the installation, move config/LocalSettings.php to the
parent directory.
and nothing else.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing lis
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:24:34PM +0100, Pierre Rusin wrote:
>I would like to make a project for my school with the free software
>lilypond.
Then I suggest that you do your own homework.
>I would like to make it online. With html, php, javascript, etc.. the user
>could write is c
On Nov 10, 2011, at 7:49 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:38 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
>
>
>> If SpanBars have space reserved where and only where they print, issue
>> 910 would be solved.
>>
>> If BarLines and KeySignatures later receive extra-spacing-height to
>
Mike,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:34 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
>
...
> I posted an uber-patch online that can be separated out into several
> patches.
My only concern is that it will only get tested as an uber patch and
unless you are going to push it all at once (albeit with severa
On Nov 11, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Peekay Ex wrote:
> Mike,
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:34 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>>
>
> ...
>
>> I posted an uber-patch online that can be separated out into several
>> patches.
>
>
>
> My only concern is that it will only get tested as an uber
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:35:29PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Peekay Ex writes:
>
> > With regard to the conversations we've had about potential issues me
> > pushing HEAD (so to speak).
> >
> > What do you (both) want me to do with patchy? I don't mind running the
> > script and just sending
Mike,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:55 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Peekay Ex wrote:
>
>> Mike,
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:34 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> I posted an uber-patch online that can be separated out into several
>>> patc
On Nov 11, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Peekay Ex wrote:
>
> Thanks, so just to be clear i can still test the patch en masse?
>
> --
> --
> James
Yup.
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:42:55PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
> > The patch in its current state does not affect a working test suite, and
> > it lets "make check" finish with slightly less readable output when
> > cxxabi.h breaks g++ 4.6. So it is _strictly_ an imp
Graham Percival writes:
> If James uses patch from lilypond-extra
> e52f265dd585050fe74250fd291d85886b7f653f
> then AFAIK patchy is "stupid enough". It's doing
> git clone --mirror -s %s .git
> git --git-dir=.git config core.bare false
> git checkout origin/master
> git merge --ff-only
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:42:55PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>> > The patch in its current state does not affect a working test suite, and
>> > it lets "make check" finish with slightly less readable output when
>> > cxxabi.h breaks g++
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 06:15:04PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > (the below is NOT directed at David, who is an absolutely
> > fantastic developer)
...
> this misbegotten hobby horse not belonging in Lilypond.
I agree.
> Mind you, it is not like I was enthused at
Doesn't pass make
--snip--
[/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/lily-sort.scm]
[/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/document-functions.scm]
[/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/document-translation.scm]
[/home/jlowe/li
This fails make (petty instantly actually)
--snip--
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/lily'
/usr/bin/python /home/jlowe/lilypond-git/stepmake/bin/make-version.py
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/lily/../VERSION > out/version.hh
rm -f ./out/lily-lexer-scheme.dep;
DEPENDENCIES_OU
passes make and a full make doc.
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5364048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: J_lowe,
Message:
On 2011/11/11 18:24:38, J_lowe wrote:
This fails make (petty instantly actually)
Since it removes source files, you need to remake the dependencies.
Description:
This removes ly:export for real and separates read/eval for Scheme
expressions.
Patches are:
Separat
I have a problem with understanding how spacing works in the attached file.
On my system 2.15.17, OSX, It fits on to 5 pages, and yet each page looks
like it could have one more system.
You can see the resulting pdf (with annotate-spacing turned on) at
http://www.et.byu.edu/~soresen/BruchRomance
Passes make and one reg test shows up
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2032#c6
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5373041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
> I have a problem with understanding how [vertical] spacing works
> in the attached file.
> Page 1 has 32.76 space left, according to annotate-spacing. The first
> system on page 2 has an extent-estimate of (-23.98 . 0). So why won't it
> fit on the first page?
On 11/11/11 9:19 PM, "Keith OHara" wrote:
>Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
>
>> I have a problem with understanding how [vertical] spacing works
>> in the attached file.
>
>> Page 1 has 32.76 space left, according to annotate-spacing. The first
>> system on page 2 has an extent-estimate of (-2
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:37:28 -0800, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I can only guess that it has something to do with the up-bow and fingering
and such things on top of beamed notes.
OK, I'll do some investigation in this area.
Thinking again, and testing a bit, it seems the /slurs/ increase the ext
On Nov 12, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:37:28 -0800, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I can only guess that it has something to do with the up-bow and fingering
>>> and such things on top of beamed notes.
>>
>> OK, I'll do some investigation in this area.
>>
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
