Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at> writes: > On 2011-11-11 09:31, d...@gnu.org wrote: >>> Remember that yaffut is a cross platform test suite, are things >>> like c++filt available for MSVC, for example? >> >> Huh? What concern are the platforms yaffut runs on? Don't tell me that >> Lilypond is one of its main distribution points. If it is, so much the >> better that I added a notice about the change. >> >> The point of importance are the platforms _Lilypond_ runs on. And it is >> not like the test suite will fail without demangling: it just has less >> readable output. > > If it tries to call an external binary that fails, that's a problem, > because then make check will fail...
make check fails for me already. > Now, I haven't looked at the patch, so I don't know if the test suite > will still work if c++filt is not available... The test suite does not even try to use c++filt. I have made configure _suggest_ using c++filt. > In the worst case, we need to add a configure check for it.a) don't > use demangle but a neutral name like "typeformat". I've kept the name in this latest patch because I am just using this as a fallback when demangling fails. I WASTED 4 HOURS OF DEVELOPER TIME diddling with autoconf to keep the output demangled _if_ it happens to work. I won't waste any more time trying to smuggle c++filt into stepmake's arcane rules. If Jan wants to have his pet yaffut.hh further pampered, he can do it himself. The patch in its current state does not affect a working test suite, and it lets "make check" finish with slightly less readable output when cxxabi.h breaks g++ 4.6. So it is _strictly_ an improvement. Whoever wants to invest more time in this maintenance hog is free to do so. But I refuse to further participate in this silliness. I got better things to do. Any further demands for wasting my time on this will let me abandon the patch for whoever feels more time should be wasted. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel