Mike, On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:55 PM, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: > On Nov 11, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Peekay Ex wrote: > >> Mike, >> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:34 PM, m...@apollinemike.com >> <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: >>> >> >> ... >> >>> I posted an uber-patch online that can be separated out into several >>> patches. >> >> .... >> >> My only concern is that it will only get tested as an uber patch and >> unless you are going to push it all at once (albeit with several >> revertable commits) we should test each patch individually. >> > > Hey James, > > I see what you're saying - because all of these functions are intertwined, I > want to make sure that they get reviewed together. Keith had asked me in an > earlier e-mail to explain where I see the pure-from-neighbor-interface going, > and I think it's important that one can grok its global usefulness so that > one can evaluate if it is ultimately worth it to grow it to the size to which > this patch would grow it or if it should be scrapped. > > After we finish that discussion, I'll post separate patches (in sequence) for > each change. > > Cheers, > MS > >
Thanks, so just to be clear i can still test the patch en masse? -- -- James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
