n.putt...@gmail.com schrieb:
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1681043/diff/1/2
File lily/grob.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1681043/diff/1/2#newcode126
lily/grob.cc:126: bool grob_transparent = to_boolean (get_property
("transparent"));
This is a bit fussy. `transparent' will d
Joseph Wakeling writes:
> On 06/20/2010 06:10 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> People want a _solution_ to their problem, not new problems they never
>> thought about and which are not actually in their personal problem
>> space.
>
> That's true, but it only shows that Lilypond isn't yet capable of
>
On 06/21/2010 01:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> You wish. It is a problem when Lilypond is the best tool for the job
> and/or the cheapest.
'Cheapest' is IMO nowhere near as relevant as many people think,
especially when it relates to organizations like publishers or
universities that have large b
Joseph Wakeling writes:
> On 06/21/2010 01:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> You wish. It is a problem when Lilypond is the best tool for the job
>> and/or the cheapest.
>
> 'Cheapest' is IMO nowhere near as relevant as many people think,
> especially when it relates to organizations like publisher
Hi David,
>> As for 'best tool for the job', what job are you referring to? Are
>> you sure it is the job that everyone else is trying to do?
>
> Getting the music from your head to paper.
Not that my opinion matters here, but... :)
That is the *least* important part of Lilypond for me -- in
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>>> As for 'best tool for the job', what job are you referring to? Are
>>> you sure it is the job that everyone else is trying to do?
>>
>> Getting the music from your head to paper.
>
> Not that my opinion matters here, but... :)
>
> That is the *least*
Hi David,
> But when trying to hook people on a large scale on Lilypond, you'll find
> that there is a reason Lilypond was your tool of choice, and not theirs.
Of course. So the point is simply, how much resource do/can we [the community]
spend attempting to lure "the masses"? My guess is, the "
Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
Message:
Thanks, fixed. I'll push after "make check" finishes...
http://codereview.appspot.com/1670042/diff/1/3
File lily/constrained-breaking.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1670042/diff/1/3#newcode384
lily/constrained-breaking.cc:384: Line_details for anyth
Le 20/06/2010 20:10, Reinhold Kainhofer disait :
Am Sonntag, 20. Juni 2010, um 11:00:33 schrieb Jean-Charles Malahieude:
Hi!
On a fresh build, I notice that all snippets in the docs are no longer
translated. It unfortunately seems to happen not just with me... and I
don't know when this has ap
On 6/16/10 3:18 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>
> Carl.D.Sorensen wrote Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:27 PM
>
>> Description:
>> Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments
>> in code and eliminated the irrelevant changes in
>> Documentation/snippets just due to running makelsr.py
Am Montag, 21. Juni 2010, um 22:16:39 schrieben Sie:
> Le 20/06/2010 20:10, Reinhold Kainhofer disait :
> > Am Sonntag, 20. Juni 2010, um 11:00:33 schrieb Jean-Charles Malahieude:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On a fresh build, I notice that all snippets in the docs are no longer
> >> translated. It unfortun
2010/6/21 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> I'll try to take a look at it in the next few days (I'm in Malaga at the CMMR
> conference, presenting once again the MusicXML test suite on a poster).
Welcome to Spain! don't miss the grilled sardines with cold beer.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paco
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> From a syntactical point of view, I can't see an immediate benefit of
>>> saying
>>>
>>> #path:miter
>>>
>>> instead of
>>>
>>> #'miter
>>
>> Hm? Could you explain what constitutes a "syntactical point of
>> view" in your book?
>
> I
Reviewers: carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com,
Message:
Thanks Carl.
I'll be uploading a new patch shortly.
-Patrick
http://codereview.appspot.com/1730044/diff/1/2
File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1730044/diff/1/2#newcode622
scm/define-markup-commands.scm:622
I've added my draft of an algorithm to estimate the extents.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/1730044/diff/1/2
File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1730044/diff/1/2#newcode684
scm/define-markup-commands.scm:684: (cons 0 0)))
On 2010/06/21 22:39
15 matches
Mail list logo