On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> From a syntactical point of view, I can't see an immediate benefit of >>> saying >>> >>> #path:miter >>> >>> instead of >>> >>> #'miter >> >> Hm? Could you explain what constitutes a "syntactical point of >> view" in your book? > > I probably misformulated. I simply mean that the `path:' prefix is an > additional burden to type, and it somewhat looks redundant to me.
Thank you, Werner and David, for your suggestions. I have decided to use properties to override the cap, join, and fill parameters, and will be uploading a new patch set shortly. -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
